The MS incremental linker seems to inspect the timestamp written into
the object file to determine whether or not it's contents need to be
considered. Failing to set the timestamp to a date newer than the
executable will result in the object file not participating in
subsequent links. To ameliorate this, write the current time into the
object file's TimeDateStamp field.
llvm-svn: 246607
COFF sections are accompanied with an auxiliary symbol which includes a
checksum. This checksum used to be filled with just zero but this seems
to upset LINK.exe when it is processing a /INCREMENTAL link job.
Instead, fill the CheckSum field with the JamCRC of the section
contents. This matches MSVC's behavior.
This fixes PR19666.
N.B. A rather simple implementation of JamCRC is given. It implements
a byte-wise calculation using the method given by Sarwate. There are
implementations with higher throughput like slice-by-eight and making
use of PCLMULQDQ. We can switch to one of those techniques if it turns
out to be a significant use of time.
llvm-svn: 246590
Avoid marking some MCSymbols as used in MC/AsmParser.cpp when no uses
exist. This fixes a bug in parseAssignmentExpression() which
inadvertently sets IsUsed, thereby triggering:
"invalid re-assignment of non-absolute variable"
on otherwise valid code. No other functionality change intended.
The original version of this patch touched many calls to MCSymbol
accessors. On rafael's advice, I have stripped this patch down a bit.
As a follow-up, I intend to find the call sites which intentionally set
IsUsed and force them to do so explicitly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12347
llvm-svn: 246457
The VOP3 encoding of these allows any SGPR pair for the i1
output, but this was forced before to always use vcc.
This doesn't yet try to use this, but does add the operand
to the definitions so the main change is adding vcc to the
output of the VOP2 encoding.
llvm-svn: 246358
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
This is a fix for disassembling unusual instruction sequences in 64-bit
mode w.r.t the CALL rel16 instruction. It might be desirable to move the
check somewhere else, but it essentially mimics the special case
handling with JCXZ in 16-bit mode.
The current behavior accepts the opcode size prefix and causes the
call's immediate to stop disassembling after 2 bytes. When debugging
sequences of instructions with this pattern, the disassembler output
becomes extremely unreliable and essentially useless (if you jump midway
into what lldb thinks is a unified instruction, you'll lose %rip). So we
ignore the prefix and consume all 4 bytes when disassembling a 64-bit
mode binary.
Note: in Vol. 2A 3-99 the Intel spec states that CALL rel16 is N.S. N.S.
is defined as:
Indicates an instruction syntax that requires an address override
prefix in 64-bit mode and is not supported. Using an address
override prefix in 64-bit mode may result in model-specific
execution behavior. (Vol. 2A 3-7)
Since 0x66 is an operand override prefix we should be OK (although we
may want to warn about 0x67 prefixes to 0xe8). On the CPUs I tested
with, they all ignore the 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode.
Patch by Matthew Barney!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9573
llvm-svn: 246038
COMISD should receive QWORD because it is defined as
(V)COMISD xmm1, xmm2/m64
COMISS should receive DWORD because it is defined as
(V)COMISS xmm1, xmm2/m32
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11712
llvm-svn: 245551
Since r244955, we try to use the short-form ErrorInfo when both
tries failed, and the long-form match failed on a suffix operand.
However, this means we sometimes mix ErrorInfo and MatchResult
(one manifestation of this being PR24498). Instead, restore both.
llvm-svn: 245469
To properly handle this, define the *a instructions as separate
instruction classes by refactoring the LoadA and StoreA multiclasses.
Move the instruction tests into the sparcv9 file to test the difference.
llvm-svn: 245360
Summary: This is the correct way to handle JAL instructions when PIC is enabled.
Patch by Toma Tabacu
Reviewers: seanbruno, tomatabacu
Subscribers: brooks, seanbruno, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6231
llvm-svn: 245305
This is (almost) everything under MC/MachO/ARM. There are still some
cases missing, because llvm-readobj doesn't (yet) support some features,
that macho-dump provides. I plan to reduce the gap between them shortly.
llvm-svn: 245302
Summary: It is the same as LA, except that it can also load 64-bit addresses and it only works on 64-bit MIPS architectures.
Reviewers: tomatabacu, seanbruno, vkalintiris
Subscribers: brooks, seanbruno, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9524
llvm-svn: 245208
This reverts commit r245047.
It was failing on the darwin bots. The problem was that when running
./bin/llc -march=msp430
llc gets to
if (TheTriple.getTriple().empty())
TheTriple.setTriple(sys::getDefaultTargetTriple());
Which means that we go with an arch of msp430 but a triple of
x86_64-apple-darwin14.4.0 which fails badly.
That code has to be updated to select a triple based on the value of
march, but that is not a trivial fix.
llvm-svn: 245062
Other than some places that were handling unknown as ELF, this should
have no change. The test updates are because we were detecting
arm-coff or x86_64-win64-coff as ELF targets before.
It is not clear if the enum should live on the Triple. At least now it lives
in a single location and should be easier to move somewhere else.
llvm-svn: 245047
We used to just say "invalid type suffix for instruction", which is
misleading. This is because we fallback to the long-form matcher if the
short-form matcher failed, losing the error information on the way.
Save it, so that we can provide a little better diagnostics when the
long-form matcher thinks a suffix is the cause of the error.
llvm-svn: 244955
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11471
It improves the code generated for converting a scalar to a vector value. With
direct moves from GPRs to VSRs, we no longer require expensive stack operations
for this. Subsequent patches will handle the reverse case and more general
operations between vectors and their scalar elements.
llvm-svn: 244921
REPE, REPZ, REPNZ, REPNE should have mnemonics for Intel syntax as well.
Currently using these instructions causes compilation errors for Intel syntax.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11794
llvm-svn: 244584
The "imul reg, imm" alias is not defined for intel syntax.
In intel syntax there is no w/l/q suffix for the imul instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11887
llvm-svn: 244582
Summary:
This patch remaps the assembly idiom 'move' to 'or' instead of 'daddu' or
'addu'. The use of addu/daddu instead of or as move was highlighted as a
performance issue during the analysis of a recent 64bit design. Originally
move was encoded as 'or' by binutils but was changed for the r10k cpu family
due to their pipeline which had 2 arithmetic units and a single logical unit,
and so could issue multiple (d)addu based moves at the same time but only 1
logical move.
This patch preserves the disassembly behaviour so that disassembling a old style
(d)addu move still appears as move, but assembling move always gives an or
Patch by Simon Dardis.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11796
llvm-svn: 244579
The LDD/STD instructions can load/store a 64bit quantity from/to
memory to/from a consecutive even/odd pair of (32-bit) registers. They
are part of SparcV8, and also present in SparcV9. (Although deprecated
there, as you can store 64bits in one register).
As recommended on llvmdev in the thread "How to enable use of 64bit
load/store for 32bit architecture" from Apr 2015, I've modeled the
64-bit load/store operations as working on a v2i32 type, rather than
making i64 a legal type, but with few legal operations. The latter
does not (currently) work, as there is much code in llvm which assumes
that if i64 is legal, operations like "add" will actually work on it.
The same assumption does not hold for v2i32 -- for vector types, it is
workable to support only load/store, and expand everything else.
This patch:
- Adds a new register class, IntPair, for even/odd pairs of registers.
- Modifies the list of reserved registers, the stack spilling code,
and register copying code to support the IntPair register class.
- Adds support in AsmParser. (note that in asm text, you write the
name of the first register of the pair only. So the parser has to
morph the single register into the equivalent paired register).
- Adds the new instructions themselves (LDD/STD/LDDA/STDA).
- Hooks up the instructions and registers as a vector type v2i32. Adds
custom legalizer to transform i64 load/stores into v2i32 load/stores
and bitcasts, so that the new instructions can actually be
generated, and marks all operations other than load/store on v2i32
as needing to be expanded.
- Copies the unfortunate SelectInlineAsm hack from ARMISelDAGToDAG.
This hack undoes the transformation of i64 operands into two
arbitrarily-allocated separate i32 registers in
SelectionDAGBuilder. and instead passes them in a single
IntPair. (Arbitrarily allocated registers are not useful, asm code
expects to be receiving a pair, which can be passed to ldd/std.)
Also adds a bunch of test cases covering all the bugs I've added along
the way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8713
llvm-svn: 244484
I looked into adding a warning / error for this to FileCheck, but there doesn't
seem to be a good way to avoid it triggering on the instances of it in RUN lines.
llvm-svn: 244481
