And associated commits, as they broke the Thumb bots.
This reverts commit r280935.
This reverts commit r280891.
This reverts commit r280888.
llvm-svn: 280967
I introduced this potential bug by missing this diff in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280873
...however, I'm not sure how to reach this code path with a regression test.
We may be able to remove this code and assume that the transform to a constant
is always handled by InstSimplify?
llvm-svn: 280964
Summary:
This allows specifying instructions that are available only in specific assembler variant. If AsmVariantName is specified then instruction will be presented only in MatchTable for this variant. If not specified then assembler variants will be determined based on AsmString.
Also this allows splitting assembler match tables in same way as it is done in dissasembler.
Reviewers: ab, tstellarAMD, craig.topper, vpykhtin
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24249
llvm-svn: 280952
On Windows, it is often applied to the second parameter, and the x86
backend is prepared to deal with sret appearing on any parameter.
Other backends assume it only appears on parameter zero, but those are
target-specific requirements, and not an IR-level rule.
llvm-svn: 280951
Refactor replaceDominatedUsesWith to have a flag to control whether to replace uses in BB itself.
Summary: This is in preparation for LoopSink pass which calls replaceDominatedUsesWith to update after sinking.
llvm-svn: 280949
I mised the check that it had to support ARM to work. This commit tries
to fix that, to make sure we don't emit ARM code in Thumb-only mode.
llvm-svn: 280935
Materializing something like "-3" can be done as 2 instructions:
MOV r0, #3
MVN r0, r0
This has a cost of 2, not 3. It looks like we were already trying to detect this pattern in TII::getIntImmCost(), but were taking the complement of the zero-extended value instead of the sign-extended value which is unlikely to ever produce a number < 256.
There were no tests failing after changing this... :/
llvm-svn: 280928
Add the ability to computeKnownBits and SimplifyDemandedBits to extract the known zero/one bits from BUILD_VECTOR, returning the known bits that are shared by every vector element.
This is an initial step towards determining the sign bits of a vector (PR29079).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24253
llvm-svn: 280927
This reverts commit r280808.
It is possible that this change results in an infinite loop. This
is causing timeouts in some tests on ARM, and a Chromebook bot is
failing.
llvm-svn: 280918
Summary:
C allows to jump over variables declaration so lifetime.start can be
avoid before variable usage. To avoid false-positives on such rare cases
we detect them and remove from lifetime analysis.
PR27453
PR28267
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24321
llvm-svn: 280907
Summary:
When cloning blocks for prologue/epilogue we need to replicate the loop
structure from the original loop. It wasn't a problem for the innermost
loops, but it led to an incorrect loop info when we unrolled a loop with
a child loop - in this case created prologue-loop had a child loop, but
loop info didn't reflect that.
This fixes PR28888.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24203
llvm-svn: 280901
In r279628, we made SourceCoverageView list the binary associated with a
view and started adding labels (e.g "Source: foo" or "Function: bar") to
everything. Condense this information a bit to unclutter reports.
llvm-svn: 280896
CGP tail-duplicates rets into blocks that end with a call that feed the ret.
This puts the call in tail position, potentially allowing the DAG builder to
lower it as a tail call. To avoid tail duplication in cases where we won't
form the tail call, CGP tried to predict whether this is going to be possible,
and avoids doing it when lowering as a tail call will definitely fail.
However, it was being too conservative by always throwing away calls to
functions with a signext/zeroext attribute on the return type.
Instead, we can use the same logic the builder uses to determine whether the
attributes work out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24315
llvm-svn: 280894
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:
1. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
2. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931
llvm-svn: 280888
Summary:
This file should be referenced from
thinlto-function-summary-callgraph-pgo.ll file,
but someone forgot to use it there. Everything worked because
we store pgo data about callsite blocks, so there is no need to have
pgo count of @func.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24309
llvm-svn: 280882
Summary:
C allows to jump over variables declaration so lifetime.start can be
avoid before variable usage. To avoid false-positives on such rare cases
we detect them and remove from lifetime analysis.
PR27453
PR28267
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24321
llvm-svn: 280880
We can't create metadata-valued PHIs; don't try to do so when sinking.
I created a test case for this using the @llvm.type.test intrinsic, because it
takes a metadata parameter and does not have severe side effects (thus
SimplifyCFG is willing to otherwise sink it).
Previously, running the test case would crash with:
Invalid use of metadata!
%.sink = select i1 %flag, metadata <...>, metadata <0x4e45dc0>
LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted!
llvm-svn: 280866
This is a revert of r280676 which was a revert of r280637;
ie, this is r280637 again. It was speculatively reverted to
help debug buildbot failures.
llvm-svn: 280861
No need to have a long inline code snippet in this doc.
Also move "flags that control numerical code" underneath the "invoking
clang" section, and reformat things a bit.
llvm-svn: 280857
Shadow uses need to be analyzed together, since each individual shadow
will only have a partial reaching def. All shadows together may cover
a given register ref, while each individual shadow may not.
llvm-svn: 280855
