Currently, far jmp/call which utilizes a 48bit memory operand would have been invoked via the 'lcall/ljmp' mnemonic (intel style).
This patch align those variants to formal intel spec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35846
llvm-svn: 310485
The recently improved support for `icmp` in ValueTracking
(r307304) exposes the fact that `isImplied` condition doesn't
really bail out if we hit the recursion limit (and calls
`computeKnownBits` which increases the depth and asserts).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36512
llvm-svn: 310481
Summary:
By removing FeatureNoARM implies ModeThumb, we can detect cases where a
function's target-features contain -thumb-mode (enables ARM codegen for the
function), but the architecture does not support ARM mode. Previously, the
implication caused the FeatureNoARM bit to be cleared for functions with
-thumb-mode, making the assertion in ARMSubtarget::ARMSubtarget [1]
pointless for such functions.
This assertion is the only guard against generating ARM code for
architectures without ARM codegen support. Is there a place where we
could easily generate error messages for the user? At the moment, we
would generate ARM code for Thumb-only architectures. X86 has the same
behavior as ARM, as in it only has an assertion and no error message,
but I think for ARM an error message would be helpful. What do you
think?
For the example below, `llc -mtriple=armv7m-eabi test.ll -o -` will
generate ARM assembler (or fail with an assertion error with this patch).
Note that if we run the resulting assembler through llvm-mc, we get
an appropriate error message, but not when codegen is handled
through clang.
```
define void @bar() #0 {
entry:
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "target-features"="-thumb-mode" }
```
[1] c1f7b54cef/lib/Target/ARM/ARMSubtarget.cpp (L147)
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin, peter.smith, aadg, silviu.baranga, richard.barton.arm, echristo
Reviewed By: rengolin, echristo
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35569
llvm-svn: 310476
formatv_object currently uses the implicitly defined move constructor,
but it is buggy. In typical use-cases, the problem doesn't show-up
because all calls to the move constructor are elided. Thus, the buggy
constructors are never invoked.
The issue especially shows-up when code is compiled using the
-fno-elide-constructors compiler flag. For instance, this is useful when
attempting to collect accurate code coverage statistics.
The exact issue is the following:
The Parameters data member is correctly moved, thus making the
parameters occupy a new memory location in the target
object. Unfortunately, the default copying of the Adapters blindly
copies the vector of pointers, leaving each of these pointers
referencing the parameters in the original object instead of the copied
one. These pointers quickly become dangling when the original object is
deleted. This quickly leads to crashes.
The solution is to update the Adapters pointers when performing a move.
The copy constructor isn't useful for format objects and can thus be
deleted.
This resolves PR33388.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34463
llvm-svn: 310475
Adopt a more strict approach regarding what marks should/can appear after a destination register, when operating upon an AVX512 platform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35785
llvm-svn: 310467
isLegalAddressingMode() has recently gained the extra optional Instruction*
parameter, and therefore it can now do the job that previously only
isFoldableMemAccess() could do.
The SystemZ implementation of isLegalAddressingMode() has gained the
functionality of checking for offsets, which used to be done with
isFoldableMemAccess().
The isFoldableMemAccess() hook has been removed everywhere.
Review: Quentin Colombet, Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35933
llvm-svn: 310463
In the recursive call to isAMCompletelyFolded(), the passed offset should be
the sum of F.BaseOffset and Fixup.Offset.
Review: Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 310462
Assert that a binary expression is actually a binary expression,
rather than potientially incorrectly attempting to handle it as a
unary expression.
This resolves PR34083.
Thanks to Simonn Pilgrim for reporting the issue!
llvm-svn: 310460
The '#' token is not a comment for all targets (on ARM and AArch64 it marks an
immediate operand), so we shouldn't treat it as such.
Comments are already converted to AsmToken::EndOfStatement by
AsmLexer::LexLineComment, so this check was unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36405
llvm-svn: 310457
to Nodes when removing ref edges from a RefSCC.
This map based association turns out to be pretty expensive for large
RefSCCs and pointless as we already have embedded data members inside
nodes that we use to track the DFS state. We can reuse one of those and
the map becomes unnecessary.
This also fuses the update of those numbers into the scan across the
pending stack of nodes so that we don't walk the nodes twice during the
DFS.
With this I expect the new PM to be faster than the old PM for the test
case I have been optimizing. That said, it also seems simpler and more
direct in many ways. The side storage was always pretty awkward.
The last remaining hot-spot in the profile of the LCG once this is done
will be the edge iterator walk in the DFS. I'll take a look at improving
that next.
llvm-svn: 310456
that RefSCC still connected.
This is common and can be handled much more efficiently. As soon as we
know we've covered every node in the RefSCC with the DFS, we can simply
reset our state and return. This avoids numerous data structure updates
and other complexity.
On top of other changes, this appears to get new PM back to parity with
the old PM for a large protocol buffer message source code. The dense
map updates are very hot in this function.
llvm-svn: 310451
limited batch updates.
Specifically, allow removing multiple reference edges starting from
a common source node. There are a few constraints that play into
supporting this form of batching:
1) The way updates occur during the CGSCC walk, about the most we can
functionally batch together are those with a common source node. This
also makes the batching simpler to implement, so it seems
a worthwhile restriction.
2) The far and away hottest function for large C++ files I measured
(generated code for protocol buffers) showed a huge amount of time
was spent removing ref edges specifically, so it seems worth focusing
there.
3) The algorithm for removing ref edges is very amenable to this
restricted batching. There are just both API and implementation
special casing for the non-batch case that gets in the way. Once
removed, supporting batches is nearly trivial.
This does modify the API in an interesting way -- now, we only preserve
the target RefSCC when the RefSCC structure is unchanged. In the face of
any splits, we create brand new RefSCC objects. However, all of the
users were OK with it that I could find. Only the unittest needed
interesting updates here.
How much does batching these updates help? I instrumented the compiler
when run over a very large generated source file for a protocol buffer
and found that the majority of updates are intrinsically updating one
function at a time. However, nearly 40% of the total ref edges removed
are removed as part of a batch of removals greater than one, so these
are the cases batching can help with.
When compiling the IR for this file with 'opt' and 'O3', this patch
reduces the total time by 8-9%.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36352
llvm-svn: 310450
It is possible that dependent instruction may access memory.
In this case we must reject optimization because the memory change will
be visible in null handler basic block. So we will execute an instruction which
we must not execute if check fails.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36392
llvm-svn: 310443
For some reason I didn't see this failure the first time. The
output format changed slightly, so we just have to update the
test for the new format.
llvm-svn: 310442
In the refactor to merge the publics and globals stream, a bug
was introduced that wrote the wrong value for one of the fields
of the PublicsStreamHeader. This caused debugging in WinDbg
to break.
We had no way of dumping any of these fields, so in addition to
fixing the bug I've added dumping support for them along with a
test that verifies the correct value is written.
llvm-svn: 310439
The publics stream and globals stream are very similar. They both
contain a list of hash buckets that refer into a single shared stream,
the symbol record stream. Because of the need for each builder to manage
both an independent hash stream as well as a single shared record
stream, making the two builders be independent entities is not the right
design. This patch merges them into a single class, of which only a
single instance is needed to create all 3 streams. PublicsStreamBuilder
and GlobalsStreamBuilder are now merged into the single GSIStreamBuilder
class, which writes all 3 streams at once.
Note that this patch does not contain any functionality change. So we're
still not yet writing any records to the globals stream. All we're doing
is making it so that when we do start writing records to the globals,
this refactor won't have to be part of that patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36489
llvm-svn: 310438
This reverts commit r310115.
It causes a linker failure for the one of the unittests of AArch64 on one
of the linux bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/3429
: && /home/fedora/gcc/install/gcc-7.1.0/bin/g++ -fPIC
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall -W
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
-Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O2
-L/home/fedora/gcc/install/gcc-7.1.0/lib64 -Wl,-allow-shlib-undefined
-Wl,-O3 -Wl,--gc-sections
unittests/Target/AArch64/CMakeFiles/AArch64Tests.dir/InstSizes.cpp.o -o
unittests/Target/AArch64/AArch64Tests
lib/libLLVMAArch64CodeGen.so.6.0.0svn lib/libLLVMAArch64Desc.so.6.0.0svn
lib/libLLVMAArch64Info.so.6.0.0svn lib/libLLVMCodeGen.so.6.0.0svn
lib/libLLVMCore.so.6.0.0svn lib/libLLVMMC.so.6.0.0svn
lib/libLLVMMIRParser.so.6.0.0svn lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.so.6.0.0svn
lib/libLLVMTarget.so.6.0.0svn lib/libLLVMSupport.so.6.0.0svn -lpthread
lib/libgtest_main.so.6.0.0svn lib/libgtest.so.6.0.0svn -lpthread
-Wl,-rpath,/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/lib
&& :
unittests/Target/AArch64/CMakeFiles/AArch64Tests.dir/InstSizes.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0):
undefined reference to `vtable for llvm::LegalizerInfo'
unittests/Target/AArch64/CMakeFiles/AArch64Tests.dir/InstSizes.cpp.o:(.toc+0x8):
undefined reference to `vtable for llvm::RegisterBankInfo'
The particularity of this bot is that it is built with
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
However, I was not able to reproduce the problem so far.
Reverting to unblock the bot.
llvm-svn: 310425
Before, the outliner would mark all instructions that read from/modify LR as
illegal. This doesn't handle W30, which overlaps with LR. This shouldn't be
outlined.
This commit fixes that by making modifiesRegister() and readsRegister() look at
W30 + take in a TRI argument. This makes sure that modifiesRegister() and
readsRegister() won't outline either of W30 and LR.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36435
llvm-svn: 310422
When a new phi is generated for scalarpre of an expression, the phiTranslate cache
will become stale: Before PRE, the candidate expression must not be available in a
predecessor block, and phitranslate will cache the information. After PRE, the
expression will become available in all predecessor blocks, so the related entries
in phiTranslate cache becomes stale. The patch will simply remove the stale entries
so phiTranslate can be recomputed next time.
The stale entries in phitranslate cache will not affect correctness but will cause
missing PRE opportunity for later instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36124
llvm-svn: 310421
Summary: Currently, ICP checks the count against a fixed value to see if it is hot enough to be promoted. This does not work for SamplePGO because sampled count may be much smaller. This patch uses PSI to check if the count is hot enough to be promoted.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36341
llvm-svn: 310416
Previously we limited ourselves to only emitting nested classes, but we
need other kinds of types as well.
This fixes the Visual Studio STL visualizers, so that users can
visualize std::string and other objects.
llvm-svn: 310410
We already support pulling through an add with constant RHS. We can do the same for subtract.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36443
llvm-svn: 310407
Summary:
Now that we've made all the necessary backend changes, we can add a new
intrinsic which exposes the new capabilities to IR producers. Since
llvm.amdgpu.update.dpp is a strict superset of llvm.amdgpu.mov.dpp, we
should deprecate the former. We also add tests for all the functionality
that was added in previous changes, now that we can access it via an IR
construct.
Reviewers: tstellar, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34718
llvm-svn: 310399
The compiler outputs PROC32_ID symbols into the object files
for functions, and these symbols have an embedded type index
which, when copied to the PDB, refer to the IPI stream. However,
the symbols themselves are also converted into regular symbols
(e.g. S_GPROC32_ID -> S_GPROC32), and type indices in the regular
symbol records refer to the TPI stream. So this patch applies
two fixes to function records.
1. It converts ID symbols to the proper non-ID record type.
2. After remapping the type index from the object file's index
space to the PDB file/IPI stream's index space, it then
remaps that index to the TPI stream's index space by.
Besides functions, during the remapping process we were also
discarding symbol record types which we did not recognize.
In particular, we were discarding S_BPREL32 records, which is
what MSVC uses to describe local variables on the stack. So
this patch fixes that as well by copying them to the PDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36426
llvm-svn: 310394
This adds a missing call to maybeUpdateMaxDwarfVersion when visitng a
clang module. Failing to do so will cause a failure when emitting
DWARF 4 forms into a CU that AsmPrinter believes to be DWARF 2.
rdar://problem/33666528
llvm-svn: 310392
Summary:
When vectorizing fcmps we can trip on incorrect cast assertion when setting the
FastMathFlags after generating the vectorized FCmp.
This can happen if the FCmp can be folded to true or false directly. The fix
here is to set the FastMathFlag using the FastMathFlagBuilder *before* creating
the FCmp Instruction. This is what's done by other optimizations such as
InstCombine.
Added a test case which trips on cast assertion without this patch.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, mkuper, gilr
Reviewed by: Ayal, mssimpso
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36244
llvm-svn: 310389
This reverts r310243. Only MVFR2 is actually restricted to v8 and it'll be a
little while before we can get a proper fix together. Better that we allow
incorrect code than reject correct in the meantime.
llvm-svn: 310384
I want to reuse this code in SimplifyDemandedBits handling of Add/Sub. This will make that easier.
Wonder if we should use it in SelectionDAG's computeKnownBits too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36433
llvm-svn: 310378
This doesn't yet support parsing things like %pcrel_hi(foo), but will handle
basic instructions with register or immediate operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23563
llvm-svn: 310361
