During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355490
This allows us to use an 8-bit sign extended immediate instead of a 16 or 32 bit immediate.
Also do similar for 0x80000000 with 64-bit adds to avoid having to use a movabsq.
llvm-svn: 355485
128 won't fit in a sign extended 8-bit immediate, but we can negate it to -128 and use the other operation. This results in a shorter encoding since the move would have used 16 or 32 bits for the immediate.
llvm-svn: 355484
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355483
Some target might try to subclass the PostGenericScheduler to custom the scheduling strategy.
We need to declare the member data of PostGenericScheduler as "protected", which acts the same as "GenericScheduler".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58949
llvm-svn: 355475
Summary:
This tag is documented in https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/817-1984/chapter6-42444/index.html
Though I could not find some docs that describe it in detail, I found some code snippets.
1.
```
/*
* Look up the string in the string table and get its offset. If
* this succeeds, then it is possible that there is a DT_NEEDED
* dynamic entry that references it.
*/
have_string = elfedit_sec_findstr(argstate->str.sec,
strpad_elt.dn_dyn.d_un.d_val, arg, &str_offset) != 0;
if (have_string) {
dyn = argstate->dynamic.data;
for (ndx = 0; ndx < numdyn; dyn++, ndx++) {
if (((dyn->d_tag == DT_NEEDED) ||
(dyn->d_tag == DT_USED)) &&
(dyn->d_un.d_val == str_offset))
goto done;
}
}
```
80192cd83b/usr/src/cmd/sgs/elfedit/modules/common/syminfo.c (L512)
2.
```
case DT_USED:
case DT_INIT_ARRAY:
case DT_FINI_ARRAY:
if (do_dynamic)
{
if (entry->d_tag == DT_USED
&& VALID_DYNAMIC_NAME (entry->d_un.d_val))
{
char *name = GET_DYNAMIC_NAME (entry->d_un.d_val);
if (*name)
{
printf (_("Not needed object: [%s]\n"), name);
break;
}
}
print_vma (entry->d_un.d_val, PREFIX_HEX);
putchar ('\n');
}
break;
```
http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/head/contrib/binutils/binutils/readelf.c
3.
```
#define DT_USED 0x7ffffffe /* ignored - same as needed */
```
https://github.com/switchbrew/switch-tools/blob/master/src/elf_common.h
Reviewers: jhenderson, grimar
Reviewed By: jhenderson, grimar
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58762
llvm-svn: 355468
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
When dumping ToT clan's debug info with dwarfdump, we were seeing an
error saying that that the location list overflows the debug_loc
section. After reducing the testcase we figured out that we were
interpreting the DW_FORM_data4 as a section offset.
In DWARF3 DW_FORM_data4 and DW_FORM_data8 served also as a section
offset. Until now we didn't check check for the DWARF version, because
some producers (read old versions of clang) were still emitting this.
The relevant code/comment was added in 2013, and I believe it's now
reasonable to start checking the version.
The FormValue class is a little bit of a mess because it cashes the
DWARF unit and context when it extracted the value itself. Several
methods of the class rely on it being present, or return an Optional for
the code path that needs it. At the same time the FormValue class also
used in places where there's no DWARF unit.
For this patch I went with the least invasive change: checking the
version from the CU when it's available. If it's not (because the form
value was created from a value directly) we default to the old behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58698
llvm-svn: 355456
Partly addresses PR15026.
There are a few tests that passed in invalid architectures, which are fixed in: rL355349 and D58931
Reviewers: echristo, efriedma, rengolin, atrick
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58933
llvm-svn: 355455
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces. If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0. Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760
llvm-svn: 355453
There was no proper test for that code in X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT().
Noticed accidentally while trying to modify the last branch in that function.
llvm-svn: 355452
Summary:
- Replaces some uses of `MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)` with
`MBB->getIterator()` and `MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)` with
`MI->getIterator()`, which are simpler.
- Replaces some uses of `std::prev` of `std::next` that takes a
MachineFunction or MachineBasicBlock iterator with `getPrevNode` and
`getNextNode`, which are also simpler.
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sunfish, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58913
llvm-svn: 355444
Getting rid of the name "optimization remarks" for anything that
involves handling remarks on the client side.
It's safer to do this now, before we get stuck with that name in all the
APIs and public interfaces we decide to export to users in the future.
This renames llvm/tools/opt-remarks to llvm/tools/remarks-shlib, and now
generates `libRemarks.dylib` instead of `libOptRemarks.dylib`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58535
llvm-svn: 355439
Tests only for integers, not floating point or pointers.
The scalar 8-bit case uses branch instead of CMOV,
because there is no no 8-bit CMOV.
Vector tests are for consistency, since it can be vectorized.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40965
llvm-svn: 355436
This caused the first matcher in the isel table for many targets to Opc_Scope instead of Opc_SwitchOpcode. This leads to a significant increase in isel match failures.
llvm-svn: 355433
These arrays are both keyed by CPU name and go into the same tablegenerated file. Merge them so we only need to store keys once.
This also removes a weird space saving quirk where we used the ProcDesc.size() to create to build an ArrayRef for ProcSched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58939
llvm-svn: 355431
The variable X86DomainReassignment::EnclosedEdges is used to store registers that have been enclosed in some closure, so those registers will be ignored when create new closures. But there is no registers has ever been put into this set, so a single register can be enclosed in multiple closures, it significantly increase compile time.
This patch adds a register into EnclosedEdges when it is enclosed into a closure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58646
llvm-svn: 355430
The description for CPUs was just the CPU name wrapped with "Select the " and " processor". We can just do that directly in the help printer instead of making a separate version in the binary for each CPU.
Also remove the Value field that isn't needed and was always 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58938
llvm-svn: 355429
The SubtargetFeature class managed a list of features as strings. And it also had functions for setting bits in a FeatureBitset.
The methods that operated on the Feature list as strings are used in other parts of the backend. But the parts that operate on FeatureBitset are very tightly coupled to MCSubtargetInfo and requires passing in the arrays that MCSubtargetInfo owns. And the same struct type is used for ProcFeatures and ProcDesc.
This has led to MCSubtargetInfo having 2 arrays keyed by CPU name. One containing a mapping from a CPU name to its features. And one containing a mapping from CPU name to its scheduler model.
I would like to make a single CPU array containing all CPU information and remove some unneeded fields the ProcDesc array currently has. But I don't want to make SubtargetFeatures.h have to know about the scheduler model type and have to forward declare or pull in the header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58937
llvm-svn: 355428
We already do this for 16/32/64 as well as 8-bit add with register/immediate. Might as well do it for 8-bit INC/DEC too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58869
llvm-svn: 355424
We already support 8-bits adds in convertToThreeAddress. But we can also support 8-bit OR if the bits are disjoint. We already do this for 16/32/64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58863
llvm-svn: 355423
x86-64 is an invalid architecture in triples. Changing it to the correct
triple (x86_64) changes some tests, because SLP is not deemed profitable
any more.
Reviewers: ABataev, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58931
llvm-svn: 355420
Currently one can concatenate strings using hash(#),
but not lists, although that would be a natural thing to do.
This patch allows one to write something like:
def : A<!listconcat([1,2], [3,4])>;
simply as :
def : A<[1,2] # [3,4]>;
This was missing feature was highlighted by Nicolai
at FOSDEM talk.
Reviewed by: nhaehnle, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58895
llvm-svn: 355414
When --compress-debug-sections is given, llvm-objcopy do not compress
sections that have "ZLIB" header in data. Normally this signature is used
in zlib-gnu compression format. But if zlib-gnu used then the name of the compressed
section should start from .z* (e.g .zdebug_info). If it does not, then it is not
a zlib-gnu format and section should be treated as a normal uncompressed section.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58908
llvm-svn: 355399
A SCEV is not low-cost just because you can divide it by a power of 2. We need to also
check what we are dividing to make sure it too is not a high-code expansion. This helps
to not expand the exit value of certain loops, helping not to bloat the code.
The change in no-iv-rewrite.ll is reverting back to what it was testing before rL194116,
and looks a lot like the other tests in replace-loop-exit-folds.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58435
llvm-svn: 355393
If zlib is not available, and --compress-debug-sections is passed,
we want to report an error. Currently, it is only reported for
--compress_debug_sections= form of the option.
Fixes the https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40886.
I do not think there is a way to write a test for this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58909
llvm-svn: 355391
We can already update multiple files in each update call, this extends it to work with wildcards as well in the same way as update_mca_test_checks.py (to support shells that won't do this for us - windows command prompt etc.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58817
llvm-svn: 355386
When lowering a select_cc node where the true and false values are of type f16,
we can't use a general conditional move because the FP16 instructions do not
support conditional execution. Instead, we must ensure that the condition code
is one of the four supported by the VSEL instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58813
llvm-svn: 355385
Summary:
In some cases the KILL was causing a hazard to be introduced as these were
scheduled into hazard slots, but don't result in an instruction.
KILL shouldn't be considered for hazard recognition.
Change-Id: Ib6d2a2160f8c94cd0ce611ab198c7e4f46aeffcf
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58898
llvm-svn: 355384
