The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers that were saved are also live-on-exit from the function.
This isn't always the case as illustrated by the LR register on ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36160
llvm-svn: 310619
Summary:
Preserve chain dependecies between old and new loads constructed to
prevent loads from reordering below later stores.
Fixes PR34088.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36528
llvm-svn: 310604
In FoldConstantArithmetic, handle BUILD_VECTOR nodes that do implicit truncation on the elements.
This is similar to what is done in FoldConstantVectorArithmetic.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36506
llvm-svn: 310593
a legal cond operand.
When scalarizing the result of a vselect, the legalizer currently expects
to already have scalarized the operands. While this is true for the true/false
operands (which have the same type as the result), it is not case for the
condition operand. On X86 AVX512, v1i1 is legal - this leads to operations such
as '< N x type> vselect < N x i1> < N x type> < N x type>' where < N x type > is
illegal to hit an assertion during the scalarization.
The handling is similar to r205625.
This also exposes the fact that (v1i1 extract_subvector) should be legal
and selectable on AVX512 - We do this by custom lowering to vector_extract_elt.
This still leaves us in some cases with redundant dag nodes which will be
combined in a separate soon to come patch.
This fixes pr33349.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36511
llvm-svn: 310552
It is possible that dependent instruction may access memory.
In this case we must reject optimization because the memory change will
be visible in null handler basic block. So we will execute an instruction which
we must not execute if check fails.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36392
llvm-svn: 310443
Previously we limited ourselves to only emitting nested classes, but we
need other kinds of types as well.
This fixes the Visual Studio STL visualizers, so that users can
visualize std::string and other objects.
llvm-svn: 310410
Relanding after case to insert explicit truncation as necessary.
Allow SCALAR_TO_VECTOR of EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT to reduce to
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR of vector shuffle when output is smaller. Marginally
improves vector shuffle computations.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35566
llvm-svn: 310256
The NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes flag is set to false at the beginning of CodeGenAndEmitDAG, and set to true after legalizing types.
But before calling CodeGenAndEmitDAG we build the DAG for the basic block.
So for the first basic block NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes would be 'false' during the SDAG building, and for all other basic blocks it would be 'true'.
This patch sets the flag to false before SDAG building each basic block.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33435
llvm-svn: 310239
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. I
think we could avoid the push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on
a different reg? That's a post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but I think those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so I don't think we actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what I think is a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310208
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Committed on behalf of @jbhateja (Jatin Bhateja)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 310058
With this change, the GlobalISel library gets always built. In
particular, this is not possible to opt GlobalISel out of the build
using the LLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL variable any more.
llvm-svn: 309990
The debug value live intervals computed by Live Debug Variables may extend
beyond the range of the debug location's lexical scope. In this case,
splitting of an interval can result in an interval outside of the scope being
created, causing extra unnecessary DBG_VALUEs to be emitted. To prevent this,
trim the intervals to the lexical scope.
This resolves PR33730.
Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35953
llvm-svn: 309933
rL306209 taught SelectionDAG how to add the dereferenceable flag when
expanding memcpy and memmove. The fix however contained a nit where
the offset + size was constructed as an APInt of PointerSize rather
than PointerSizeInBits.
This lead to isDereferenceableAndAlignedPointer() get truncated values or
values which would be sign extended within that function leading to
incorrect results.
Thanks to Alex Crichton for reporting the issue!
This resolves PR33978.
Reviewers: inouehrs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36236
llvm-svn: 309930
Summary:
To delete an instruction the coalescer needs to call eraseFromParent()
on the MachineInstr, insert it in the ErasedInstrs list and update the
Live Ranges structure. This patch re-factors the code to do all that in
one function. This will also fix cases where previous code wasn't
inserting deleted instructions in the ErasedList.
Reviewers: qcolombet, kparzysz
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB, llvm-commits, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36204
llvm-svn: 309915
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
This patch is update after the first patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL309651) based on the post-commit comments.
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
This patch fixes PR33928.
llvm-svn: 309849
During store merge we construct a sorted list of consecutive store
candidates and consider subsequences for merging into a single
store. For each subsequence we check if the stored value type is legal
the merged store would have valid and fast and if the constructed
value to be stored is valid. The only properties that affect this
check between subsequences is the size of the subsequence, the
alignment of the first store, the alignment of the stored load value
(when merging stores-of-loads), and whether the merged value is a
constant zero.
If we do not find a viable mergeable subsequence starting from the
first store of length N, we know that a subsequence starting at a
later store of length N will also fail unless the new store's
alignment, the new load's alignment (if we're merging store-of-loads),
or we've dropped stores of nonzero value and could construct a merged
stores of zero (for merging constants).
As a result if we fail to find a valid subsequence starting from the
first store we can safely skip considering subsequences that start
with subsequent stores unless one of the above properties is
true. This significantly (2x) improves compile time in some
pathological cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, zvi, spatel, waltl
Subscribers: grandinj, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35901
llvm-svn: 309830
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
This pattern shows up when lowering byval copies on AMDGPU.
The byval object access is split into 4-byte chunks, adding a
constant offset to the FixedStack base. When some of the offsets
turn into ors, this prevents combining the constant offsets.
This makes it not apparent that the object is there when matching
addressing modes, so it ends up using a scratch wave offset
relative access and the lengthy frame index expansion for that.
llvm-svn: 309775
instead of using the deprecated offset field of DBG_VALUE.
This has no observable effect on the generated DWARF, but the
assembler comments will look different.
rdar://problem/33580047
llvm-svn: 309773
In the last half-dozen commits to LLVM I removed code that became dead
after removing the offset parameter from llvm.dbg.value gradually
proceeding from IR towards the backend. Before I can move on to
DwarfDebug and friends there is one last side-called offset I need to
remove: This patch modifies PrologEpilogInserter's use of the
DBG_VALUE's offset argument to use a DIExpression instead. Because the
PrologEpilogInserter runs at the Machine level I had to play a little
trick with a named llvm.dbg.mir node to get the DIExpressions to print
in MIR dumps (which print the llvm::Module followed by the
MachineFunction dump).
I also had to add rudimentary DwarfExpression support to CodeView and
as a side-effect also fixed a bug (CodeViewDebug::collectVariableInfo
was supposed to give up on variables with complex DIExpressions, but
would fail to do so for fragments, which are also modeled as
DIExpressions).
With this last holdover removed we will have only one canonical way of
representing offsets to debug locations which will simplify the code
in DwarfDebug (and future versions of CodeViewDebug once it starts
handling more complex expressions) and make it easier to reason about.
This patch is NFC-ish: All test case changes are for assembler
comments and the binary output does not change.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36125
llvm-svn: 309751
Summary:
We already have information about static alloca stack locations in our
side table. Emitting instructions for them is inefficient, and it only
happens when the address of the alloca has been materialized within the
current block, which isn't often.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits, aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36117
llvm-svn: 309729
