ObjectLinkingLayer::Plugin instances can be used to receive events from
ObjectLinkingLayer, and to inspect/modify JITLink linker graphs. This example
shows how to write and set up a plugin to dump the linker graph at various
points in the linking process.
These examples were all copied and adapted from the original HowToUseLLJIT
example code, however the calls to cl::ParseCommandLineOptions were not
updated.
Move the assert that checks for the end iterator inside the loop which
actually moves over the elements. This allows it to check that the
iteration stays within the range.
This fixes a bug where a PHI node that is only referenced by a lifetime.end intrinsic in an otherwise empty cleanuppad can cause SimplyCFG to create an SSA violation while removing the empty cleanuppad. Theoretically the same problem can occur with debug intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72540
Summary:
D72308 incorrectly assumed `resume` cannot exist without a `landingpad`,
which is not true. This sets `Changed` to true whenever we make changes
to a function, including creating a call to `__resumeException` within a
function without a landing pad.
Reviewers: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73308
Pipeline scheduler model for the RISC-V Rocket micro-architecture using the
MIScheduler interface. Support for both 32 and 64-bit Rocket cores is
implemented.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68685
Similar to the function attribute `prefix` (prefix data),
"patchable-function-prefix" inserts data (M NOPs) before the function
entry label.
-fpatchable-function-entry=2,1 (1 NOP before entry, 1 NOP after entry)
will look like:
```
.type foo,@function
.Ltmp0: # @foo
nop
foo:
.Lfunc_begin0:
# optional `bti c` (AArch64 Branch Target Identification) or
# `endbr64` (Intel Indirect Branch Tracking)
nop
.section __patchable_function_entries,"awo",@progbits,get,unique,0
.p2align 3
.quad .Ltmp0
```
-fpatchable-function-entry=N,0 + -mbranch-protection=bti/-fcf-protection=branch has two reasonable
placements (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01185.html):
```
(a) (b)
func: func:
.Ltmp0: bti c
bti c .Ltmp0:
nop nop
```
(a) needs no additional code. If the consensus is to go for (b), we will
need more code in AArch64BranchTargets.cpp / X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73070
Summary:
RCP has the accuracy limit. If FDIV fpmath require high accuracy rcp may not
meet the requirement. However, in DAG lowering, fpmath information gets lost,
and thus we may generate either inaccurate rcp related computation or slow code
for fdiv.
In patch implements fdiv optimizations in the AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare, which could
exactly know !fpmath.
FastUnsafeRcpLegal: We determine whether it is legal to use rcp based on
unsafe-fp-math, fast math flags, denormals and fpmath
accuracy request.
RCP Optimizations:
1/x -> rcp(x) when fast unsafe rcp is legal or fpmath >= 2.5ULP with
denormals flushed.
a/b -> a*rcp(b) when fast unsafe rcp is legal.
Use fdiv.fast:
a/b -> fdiv.fast(a, b) when RCP optimization is not performed and
fpmath >= 2.5ULP with denormals flushed.
1/x -> fdiv.fast(1,x) when RCP optimization is not performed and
fpmath >= 2.5ULP with denormals.
Reviewers:
arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71293
When we use information only to short-cut deduction or improve it, we
can use OPTIONAL dependences instead of REQUIRED ones to avoid cascading
pessimistic fixpoints.
We also need to track dependences only when we use assumed information,
e.g., we act on assumed liveness information.
It can happen that we have instructions in the ToBeDeletedInsts set
which are deleted earlier already. To avoid dangling pointers we use
weak tracking handles.
When we follow uses, e.g., in AAMemoryBehavior or AANoCapture, we need
to make sure the value is a pointer before we ask for abstract
attributes only valid for pointers. This happens because we follow
pointers through calls that do not capture but may return the value.
We might accidentally ask AAValueSimplify to simplify a void value. That
can lead to very interesting, and very wrong, results. We now handle
this case gracefully.
Create a utility wrapper for the RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions utility
method, which sets to nullptr the instructions that are not trivially
dead. Use the new method in LoopStrengthReduce.
Alternative: add a bool to the same method; this option adds a marginal
amount of overhead to the other callers, and the method needs to be
updated to return a bool status when it removes/doesn't remove
instructions.
If alignment was manifested but it is actually only as good as the
data-layout provided one we should not report it as a change.
For testing purposes we still manifest the information.
Summary:
Third part in series to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization
Enablement, see RFC here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
This patch adds type test metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
even for classes without hidden visibility. It then changes WPD to skip
devirtualization for a virtual function call when any of the compatible
vtables has public vcall visibility.
Additionally, internal LLVM options as well as lld and gold-plugin
options are added which enable upgrading all public vcall visibility
to linkage unit (hidden) visibility during LTO. This enables the more
aggressive WPD to kick in based on LTO time knowledge of the visibility
guarantees.
Support was added to all flavors of LTO WPD (regular, hybrid and
index-only), and to both the new and old LTO APIs.
Unfortunately it was not simple to split the first and second parts of
this part of the change (the unconditional emission of type tests and
the upgrading of the vcall visiblity) as I needed a way to upgrade the
public visibility on legacy WPD llvm assembly tests that don't include
linkage unit vcall visibility specifiers, to avoid a lot of test churn.
I also added a mechanism to LowerTypeTests that allows dropping type
test assume sequences we now aggressively insert when we invoke
distributed ThinLTO backends with null indexes, which is used in testing
mode, and which doesn't invoke the normal ThinLTO backend pipeline.
Depends on D71907 and D71911.
Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777, steven_wu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, Prazek, inglorion, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, dexonsmith, dang, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71913
The utility method RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions receives
as input a vector of Instructions, where all inputs are valid
instructions. This same vector is used as a scratch storage (per the
header comment) to recursively delete instructions. If an instruction is
added as an operand of multiple other instructions, it may be added twice,
then deleted once, then the second reference in the vector is invalid.
Switch to using a Vector<WeakTrackingVH>.
This change facilitates a clean-up in LoopStrengthReduction.
When I cached this a long time ago it seems I forgot to remove the locally
declared variable of the same name in select(), so the caching wasn't having
any compile time benefit. Doh.
Summary:
This patch applies D60551 to an additional file. In particular, the test
is currently marked XFAIL for a number of big-endian targets; however,
the failure is actually dependent on the host endianness instead. The
test actually specifies a specific target triple.
Reviewers: rampitec, xingxue, daltenty
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, fedor.sergeev, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73192
We currently use integer ranges to merge concrete function arguments.
We use the ParamState range for those, but we only look up concrete
values in the regular state. For concrete function arguments that are
themselves arguments of the containing function, we can use the param
state directly and improve the precision in some cases.
Besides improving the results in some cases, this is also a small step towards
switching to ValueLatticeElement, by allowing D60582 to be a NFC.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71836
Summary:
Second patch in series to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization
Enablement, see RFC here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
Summarize vcall_visibility metadata in ThinLTO global variable summary.
Depends on D71907.
Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777, steven_wu
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, hiraditya, dexonsmith, arphaman, ostannard, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, davidxl
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71911
Since register classes go up to 1024, 32 elements, all masks bits are
needed and a 32-bit shift by 32 is illegal. We didn't have any
instructions theoretically using a 32 element VGPR before
d1dbb5e4718a8f845abf0783513a33a55429470b
Summary:
I initially encountered those assertions when trying to create
this IR `alignment` attribute from clang's `__attribute__((assume_aligned(imm)))`,
because until D72994 there is no sanity checking for the value of `imm`.
But even then, we have `llvm::Value::MaximumAlignment` constant (which is `536870912`),
which is enforced for clang attributes, and then there are some other magical constant
(`0x40000000` i.e. `1073741824` i.e. `2 * 536870912`) in
`Attribute::getWithAlignment()`/`AttrBuilder::addAlignmentAttr()`.
I strongly suspect that `0x40000000` is incorrect,
and that also should be `llvm::Value::MaximumAlignment`.
Reviewers: erichkeane, hfinkel, jdoerfert, gchatelet, courbet
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72998
Summary:
First patch to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization Enablement,
see RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
Always emit !vcall_visibility metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
and not just for -fvirtual-function-elimination. The vcall visibility
metadata will (in a subsequent patch) be used to communicate to WPD
which vtables are safe to devirtualize, and we will optionally convert
the metadata to hidden visibility at link time. Subsequent follow on
patches will help enable this by adding vcall_visibility metadata to the
ThinLTO summaries, and always emit type test intrinsics under
-fwhole-program-vtables (and not just for vtables with hidden
visibility).
In order to do this safely with VFE, since for VFE all vtable loads must
be type checked loads which will no longer be the case, this patch adds
a new "Virtual Function Elim" module flag to communicate to GlobalDCE
whether to perform VFE using the vcall_visibility metadata.
One additional advantage of using the vcall_visibility metadata to drive
more WPD at LTO link time is that we can use the same mechanism to
enable more aggressive VFE at LTO link time as well. The link time
option proposed in the RFC will convert vcall_visibility metadata to
hidden (aka linkage unit visibility), which combined with
-fvirtual-function-elimination will allow it to be done more
aggressively at LTO link time under the same conditions.
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard, evgeny777, steven_wu
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, hiraditya, dexonsmith, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71907
Calling `operator*` on a WeakVH with a null value yields a null
reference, which is UB. Avoid this by implicitly converting the WeakVH
to a `Value *` rather than dereferencing and then taking the address
for the type conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73280
The other 3-op patterns should also be theoretically handled, but
currently there's a bug in the inferred pattern complexity.
I'm not sure what the error handling strategy should be for potential
constant bus violations. I think the correct strategy is to never
produce mixed SGPR and VGPR operands in a typical VOP instruction,
which will trivially avoid them. However, it's possible to still have
hand written MIR (or erroneously transformed code) with these
operands. When these fold, the restriction will be violated. We
currently don't have any verifiers for reg bank legality. For now,
just ignore the restriction.
It might be worth triggering a DAG fallback on verifier error.
