Summary:
This isn't testable for AArch64 by itself so this patch also adds
support for constant immediates in the pattern and physical
register uses in the result.
The new IntOperandMatcher matches the constant in patterns such as
'(set $rd:GPR32, (G_XOR $rs:GPR32, -1))'. It's always safe to fold
immediates into an instruction so this is the first rule that will match
across multiple BB's.
The Renderer hierarchy is responsible for adding operands to the result
instruction. Renderers can copy operands (CopyRenderer) or add physical
registers (in particular %wzr and %xzr) to the result instruction
in any order (OperandMatchers now import the operand names from
SelectionDAG to allow renderers to access any operand). This allows us to
emit the result instruction for:
%1 = G_XOR %0, -1 --> %1 = ORNWrr %wzr, %0
%1 = G_XOR -1, %0 --> %1 = ORNWrr %wzr, %0
although the latter is untested since the matcher/importer has not been
taught about commutativity yet.
Added BuildMIAction which can build new instructions and mutate them where
possible. W.r.t the mutation aspect, MatchActions are now told the name of
an instruction they can recycle and BuildMIAction will emit mutation code
when the renderers are appropriate. They are appropriate when all operands
are rendered using CopyRenderer and the indices are the same as the matcher.
This currently assumes that all operands have at least one matcher.
Finally, this change also fixes a crash in
AArch64InstructionSelector::select() caused by an immediate operand
passing isImm() rather than isCImm(). This was uncovered by the other
changes and was detected by existing tests.
Depends on D29711
Reviewers: t.p.northover, ab, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: aemerson, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29712
llvm-svn: 296131
The Fuchsia ABI defines slots from the thread pointer where the
stack-guard value for stack-protector, and the unsafe stack pointer
for safe-stack, are stored. This parallels the Android ABI support.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30237
llvm-svn: 296081
Having more fine-grained information on the specific construct that
caused us to fallback is valuable for large-scale data collection.
We still have the fallback warning, that's also used for FastISel.
We still need to remove the fallback warning, and teach FastISel to also
emit remarks (it currently has a combination of the warning, stats, and
debug prints: the remarks could unify all three).
The abort-on-fallback path could also be better handled using remarks:
one could imagine a "-Rpass-error", analoguous to "-Werror", which would
promote missed/failed remarks to errors. It's not clear whether that
would be useful for other remarks though, so we're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 296013
Summary:
Extend AArch64RedundantCopyElimination to catch cases where the register
that is known to be zero is COPY'd in the predecessor block. Before
this change, this pass would catch cases like:
CBZW %W0, <BB#1>
BB#1:
%W0 = COPY %WZR // removed
After this change, cases like the one below are also caught:
%W0 = COPY %W1
CBZW %W1, <BB#1>
BB#1:
%W0 = COPY %WZR // removed
This change results in a 4% increase in static copies removed by this
pass when compiling the llvm test-suite. It also fixes regressions
caused by doing post-RA copy propagation (a separate change to be put up
for review shortly).
Reviewers: junbuml, mcrosier, t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30113
llvm-svn: 295863
Summary:
Rework the code that was sinking/duplicating (icmp and, 0) sequences
into blocks where they were being used by conditional branches to form
more tbz instructions on AArch64. The new code is more general in that
it just looks for 'and's that have all icmp 0's as users, with a target
hook used to select which subset of 'and' instructions to consider.
This change also enables 'and' sinking for X86, where it is more widely
beneficial than on AArch64.
The 'and' sinking/duplicating code is moved into the optimizeInst phase
of CodeGenPrepare, where it can take advantage of the fact the
OptimizeCmpExpression has already sunk/duplicated any icmps into the
blocks where they are used. One minor complication from this change is
that optimizeLoadExt needed to be updated to always mark 'and's it has
determined should be in the same block as their feeding load in the
InsertedInsts set to avoid an infinite loop of hoisting and sinking the
same 'and'.
This change fixes a regression on X86 in the tsan runtime caused by
moving GVNHoist to a later place in the optimization pipeline (see
PR31382).
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, mcrosier, sebpop, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28813
llvm-svn: 295746
When promoting the Load of a Store-Load pair to a COPY all kill flags
between the store and the load need to be cleared.
rdar://30402435
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30110
llvm-svn: 295512
Resubmit -r295314 with PowerPC and AMDGPU tests updated.
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 295336
Support {a|s}ext, {a|z|s}ext load nodes as a part of load combine patters.
Reviewed By: filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591
llvm-svn: 295314
Uses a Custom implementation because the slot sizes being a multiple of the
pointer size isn't really universal, even for the architectures that do have a
simple "void *" va_list.
llvm-svn: 295255
Lay out trellis-shaped CFGs optimally.
A trellis of the shape below:
A B
|\ /|
| \ / |
| X |
| / \ |
|/ \|
C D
would be laid out A; B->C ; D by the current layout algorithm. Now we identify
trellises and lay them out either A->C; B->D or A->D; B->C. This scales with an
increasing number of predecessors. A trellis is a a group of 2 or more
predecessor blocks that all have the same successors.
because of this we can tail duplicate to extend existing trellises.
As an example consider the following CFG:
B D F H
/ \ / \ / \ / \
A---C---E---G---Ret
Where A,C,E,G are all small (Currently 2 instructions).
The CFG preserving layout is then A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,Ret.
The current code will copy C into B, E into D and G into F and yield the layout
A,C,B(C),E,D(E),F(G),G,H,ret
define void @straight_test(i32 %tag) {
entry:
br label %test1
test1: ; A
%tagbit1 = and i32 %tag, 1
%tagbit1eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit1, 0
br i1 %tagbit1eq0, label %test2, label %optional1
optional1: ; B
call void @a()
br label %test2
test2: ; C
%tagbit2 = and i32 %tag, 2
%tagbit2eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit2, 0
br i1 %tagbit2eq0, label %test3, label %optional2
optional2: ; D
call void @b()
br label %test3
test3: ; E
%tagbit3 = and i32 %tag, 4
%tagbit3eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit3, 0
br i1 %tagbit3eq0, label %test4, label %optional3
optional3: ; F
call void @c()
br label %test4
test4: ; G
%tagbit4 = and i32 %tag, 8
%tagbit4eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit4, 0
br i1 %tagbit4eq0, label %exit, label %optional4
optional4: ; H
call void @d()
br label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
here is the layout after D27742:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; ... Prologue elided
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
; ... More prologue elided
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_2
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_3
b .LBB0_4
.LBB0_2: # %optional1 ; B (copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_4
.LBB0_3: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_5
b .LBB0_6
.LBB0_4: # %optional2 ; D (copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_5: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
b .LBB0_7
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit ; Ret
ld 30, 96(1) # 8-byte Folded Reload
addi 1, 1, 112
ld 0, 16(1)
mtlr 0
blr
The tail-duplication has produced some benefit, but it has also produced a
trellis which is not laid out optimally. With this patch, we improve the layouts
of such trellises, and decrease the cost calculation for tail-duplication
accordingly.
This patch produces the layout A,C,E,G,B,D,F,H,Ret. This layout does have
back edges, which is a negative, but it has a bigger compensating
positive, which is that it handles the case where there are long strings
of skipped blocks much better than the original layout. Both layouts
handle runs of executed blocks equally well. Branch prediction also
improves if there is any correlation between subsequent optional blocks.
Here is the resulting concrete layout:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_4
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_5
.LBB0_2: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_3: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
bne 0, .LBB0_7
b .LBB0_8
.LBB0_4: # %optional1 ; B (Copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_2
.LBB0_5: # %optional2 ; D (Copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_3
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (Copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28522
llvm-svn: 295223
This instruction clears the low bits of a pointer without requiring (possibly
dodgy if pointers aren't ints) conversions to and from an integer. Since (as
far as I'm aware) all masks are statically known, the instruction takes an
immediate operand rather than a register to specify the mask.
llvm-svn: 295103
Backends don't support this yet. They would have to move to the swifterror
register before the tail call to make sure it is live-in to the call.
rdar://30495920
llvm-svn: 294982
The recommit includes some changes of testcases. No functional change to the patch.
In RateRegister of existing LSR, if a formula contains a Reg which is a SCEVAddRecExpr,
and this SCEVAddRecExpr's loop is an outerloop, the formula will be marked as Loser
and dropped.
Suppose we have an IR that %for.body is outerloop and %for.body2 is innerloop. LSR only
handle inner loop now so only %for.body2 will be handled.
Using the logic above, formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) will be dropped
no matter what because reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) is a SCEVAddRecExpr type reg related
with outerloop. Only formula like
reg(%array) + 1*reg({{1,+, %size}<%for.body>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body2>) will be kept
because the SCEVAddRecExpr related with outerloop is folded into the initial value of the
SCEVAddRecExpr related with current loop.
But in some cases, we do need to share the basic induction variable
reg{0 ,+, 1}<%for.body2> among LSR Uses to reduce the final total number of induction
variables used by LSR, so we don't want to drop the formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) unconditionally.
From the existing comment, it tries to avoid considering multiple level loops at the same time.
However, existing LSR only handles innermost loop, so for any SCEVAddRecExpr with a loop other
than current loop, it is an invariant and will be simple to handle, and the formula doesn't have
to be dropped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26429
llvm-svn: 294814
Summary:
Fix two bugs in SelectionDAGBuilder::FindMergedConditions reported by
Mikael Holmen. Handle non-canonicalized xor not operation
correctly (was assuming operand 0 was always the non-constant operand)
and check that the negated condition is also in the same block as the
original and/or instruction (as is done for and/or operands already)
before proceeding with optimization.
Reviewers: bogner, MatzeB, qcolombet
Subscribers: mcrosier, uabelho, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29680
llvm-svn: 294605
If some of the trailing or leading bytes of a load combine pattern are zeroes we can combine the pattern to a load + zext and shift. Currently we don't support it, so the tests check the current codegen without load combine. This change will make the patch to support this kind of combine a bit more clear.
llvm-svn: 294591
Functions that have a dynamic alloca require a base register which is defined to
be X19 on AArch64 and r6 on ARM. We have defined the swifterror register to be
the same register. Use a different callee save register for swifterror instead:
X21 on AArch64
R8 on ARM
rdar://30433803
llvm-svn: 294551
It'll usually be immediately legalized back to a libcall, but occasionally
something can be done with it so we'd just as well enable that flexibility from
the start.
llvm-svn: 294530
We mark X0 as preserved by a call that passes the returned parameter.
x0 = ...
fun(x0) // no implicit def of x0
This no longer is valid if we pass the parameter in a different register then
the returned value as is the case with a swiftself parameter (passed in x20).
x20 = ...
fun(x20) // there should be an implict def of x8
rdar://30425845
llvm-svn: 294527
AArch64 has specific instructions to multiply two numbers at double the width
and produce the high part of the result. These can be used to implement LLVM's
mul.with.overflow instructions fairly simply. Helps with C++ operator new[].
llvm-svn: 294519
The AAPCS ABI is substantially more complicated so that's coming in a separate
patch. For now we can generate correct code for iOS though.
llvm-svn: 294493
This patch checks the number of operands in the resulting
instruction instead of just the alias, then skips over
tied operands when generating the printing method.
This allows us to generate the preferred assembly syntax
for the AArch64 'ins' instruction, which should always be
displayed as 'mov' according to the ARMARM.
Several unit tests have changed as a result, but only to
reflect the preferred disassembly.
Some other InstAlias patterns (movk/bic/orr) needed a
slight adjustment to stop them becoming the default
and breaking other unit tests.
Patch by Graham Hunter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29219
llvm-svn: 294437
Currently we don't support these nodes, so the tests check the current codegen without load combine. This change makes the review of the change to support these nodes more clear.
Separated from https://reviews.llvm.org/D29591 review.
llvm-svn: 294305
joinReservedPhysReg() can only deal with a liverange in a single basic
block when copying from a vreg into a physreg.
See also rdar://30306405
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29436
llvm-svn: 294268
AArch64 was asserting when it was asked to provide a register-bank of a size it
couldn't deal with (in this case an s128 IMPLICIT_DEF). But we want a robust
fallback path so this isn't allowed.
llvm-svn: 294248
We don't handle all cases yet (see arm64-fallback.ll for an example), but this
is enough to cover most common C++ code so it's a good place to start.
llvm-svn: 294247
When splitting up one store into several in splitStoreSplat we have to
make sure we get the MachinePointerInfo right, otherwise alias
analysis thinks they all store to the same location. This can then
cause invalid scheduling later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29446
llvm-svn: 294203
Summary:
Without this change, the getVR() call would hit an assert since it was
being passed a physical register.
Update the AArch64/ldst-opt.ll test with a case that triggers this
behavior by adding a run with strict-align, which causes an unaligned
STR XZR instruction to be split into byte stores, creating an
EXTRACT_SUBREG of XZR that triggers the original problem.
Reviewers: bogner, qcolombet, MatzeB, atrick
Subscribers: aemerson, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29495
llvm-svn: 294129
Summary:
llc would hit a fatal error for errors in inline assembly. The
diagnostics message is now printed.
Reviewers: rengolin, MatzeB, javed.absar, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29408
llvm-svn: 293999
