If we had a store of an integer to memory, and the integer and store size
were suitable for a form of MV..., we used MV... no matter what. We could
then have sequences like:
lay %r2, 0(%r3,%r4)
mvi 0(%r2), 4
In these cases it seems better to force the constant into a register
and use a normal store:
lhi %r2, 4
stc %r2, 0(%r3, %r4)
since %r2 is more likely to be hoisted and is easier to rematerialize.
llvm-svn: 189098
...so that it can be used for z too. Most of the code is the same.
The only real change is to use TargetTransformInfo to test when a sqrt
instruction is available.
The pass is opt-in because at the moment it only handles sqrt.
llvm-svn: 189097
I'd forgotten that "Requires" blocks override rather than add to the
constraints, so my pseudo-instruction was being selected in Thumb mode leading
to nonsense instructions.
rdar://problem/14817358
llvm-svn: 189096
A single metadata will not span multiple lines. This also helps me with
my script to automatic update the testing cases.
A debug info testing case should have a llvm.dbg.cu.
Do not use hard-coded id for debug nodes.
llvm-svn: 189033
Back in the mists of time (2008), it seems TableGen couldn't handle the
patterns necessary to match ARM's CMOV node that we convert select operations
to, so we wrote a lot of fairly hairy C++ to do it for us.
TableGen can deal with it now: there were a few minor differences to CodeGen
(see tests), but nothing obviously worse that I could see, so we should
probably address anything that *does* come up in a localised manner.
llvm-svn: 188995
When truncated vector stores were being custom lowered in
VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(), the old (illegal) and new (legal) node pair
was not being added to LegalizedNodes list. Instead of the legalized
result being passed to VectorLegalizer::TranslateLegalizeResult(),
the result was being passed back into VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(),
which ended up adding a (new, new) pair to the list instead.
This was causing an assertion failure when a custom lowered truncated
vector store was the last instruction a basic block and the VectorLegalizer
was unable to find it in the LegalizedNodes list when updating the
DAG root.
llvm-svn: 188953
The small utility function that pattern matches Base + Index +
Offset patterns for loads and stores fails to recognize the base
pointer for loads/stores from/into an array at offset 0 inside a
loop. As a result DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores was not able
to merge all stores.
This commit fixes the issue by adding an additional pattern match
and also a test case.
Reviewer: Nadav
llvm-svn: 188936
def imm0_63 : Operand<i32>, ImmLeaf<i32, [{ return Imm >= 0 && Imm < 63;}]>{
As it seems Imm <63 should be Imm <= 63. ImmLeaf is used in pattern match, but there is already a function check the shift amount range, so just remove ImmLeaf. Also add a test to check 63.
llvm-svn: 188911
The initial port used MLG(R) for i64 UMUL_LOHI but left the other three
combinations as not-legal-or-custom. Although 32x32->{32,32}
multiplications exist, they're not as quick as doing a normal 64-bit
multiplication, so it didn't seem like i32 SMUL_LOHI and UMUL_LOHI
would be useful. There's also no direct instruction for i64 SMUL_LOHI,
so it needs to be implemented in terms of UMUL_LOHI.
However, not defining these patterns means that we don't convert
division by a constant into multiplication, so this patch fills
in the other cases. The new i64 SMUL_LOHI sequence is simpler
than the one that we used previously for 64x64->128 multiplication,
so int-mul-08.ll now tests the full sequence.
llvm-svn: 188898
functions be compiled as mips32, without having to add attributes. This
is useful in certain situations where you don't want to have to edit the
function attributes in the source. For now it's only an option used for
the compiler developers when debugging the mips16 port.
llvm-svn: 188826
Update testcase to be more careful about checking register
values. While regexes are general goodness for these sorts of
testcases, in this example, the registers are constrained by
the calling convention, so we can and should check their
explicit values.
rdar://14779513
llvm-svn: 188819
SystemZTargetLowering::emitStringWrapper() previously loaded the character
into R0 before the loop and made R0 live on entry. I'd forgotten that
allocatable registers weren't allowed to be live across blocks at this stage,
and it confused LiveVariables enough to cause a miscompilation of f3 in
memchr-02.ll.
This patch instead loads R0 in the loop and leaves LICM to hoist it
after RA. This is actually what I'd tried originally, but I went for
the manual optimisation after noticing that R0 often wasn't being hoisted.
This bug forced me to go back and look at why, now fixed as r188774.
We should also try to optimize null checks so that they test the CC result
of the SRST directly. The select between null and the SRST GPR result could
then usually be deleted as dead.
llvm-svn: 188779
Post-RA LICM keeps three sets of registers: PhysRegDefs, PhysRegClobbers
and TermRegs. When it sees a definition of R it adds all aliases of R
to the corresponding set, so that when it needs to test for membership
it only needs to test a single register, rather than worrying about
aliases there too. E.g. the final candidate loop just has:
unsigned Def = Candidates[i].Def;
if (!PhysRegClobbers.test(Def) && ...) {
to test whether register Def is multiply defined.
However, there was also a shortcut in ProcessMI to make sure we didn't
add candidates if we already knew that they would fail the final test.
This shortcut was more pessimistic than the final one because it
checked whether _any alias_ of the defined register was multiply defined.
This is too conservative for targets that define register pairs.
E.g. on z, R0 and R1 are sometimes used as a pair, so there is a
128-bit register that aliases both R0 and R1. If a loop used
R0 and R1 independently, and the definition of R0 came first,
we would be able to hoist the R0 assignment (because that used
the final test quoted above) but not the R1 assignment (because
that meant we had two definitions of the paired R0/R1 register
and would fail the shortcut in ProcessMI).
This patch just uses the same check for the ProcessMI shortcut as
we use in the final candidate loop.
llvm-svn: 188774
Previously we used a const-pool load for virtually all 64-bit floating values.
Actually, we can get quite a few common values (including 0.0, 1.0) via "vmov"
instructions of one stripe or another.
llvm-svn: 188773
copysign/copysignf never become function calls (because the SDAG expansion code
does not lower to the corresponding function call, but rather directly
implements the associated logic), but copysignl almost always is lowered into a
call to the requested libm functon (and, thus, might clobber CTR).
llvm-svn: 188727
- split WidenVecRes_Binary into WidenVecRes_Binary and WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap
- WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap preserves the original behaviour for operations
that can trap
- WidenVecRes_Binary simply widens the operation and improves codegen for
3-element vectors by allowing widening and promotion on x86 (matches the
behaviour of unary and ternary operation widening)
- use WidenVecRes_Binary for operations on integers.
Reviewed by: nrotem
llvm-svn: 188699
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few
times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where
absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments.
llvm-svn: 188671
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6)
is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a
sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function,
which seems worth keeping as a separate patch.
Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer
use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll
and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and
truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd
use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason,
so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated
code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just
LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal.
llvm-svn: 188669
