We were using an i1 type and then zero extending to a vector. Instead just create the 0/1 directly as a ConstantInt with the correct type. No need to ask ConstantExpr to zero extend for us.
This bug is a bit tricky to hit because it requires us to visit a zext of an icmp that would normally be simplified to true/false, but that icmp hasnt' been visited yet. In the test case this zext and icmp were created by visiting a udiv and due to worklist ordering we got to the zext first.
Fixes PR34841.
llvm-svn: 314971
Summary: This is to avoid e.g. merging two cheap icmps if the target is not going to expand to something nice later.
Reviewers: dberlin, spatel
Subscribers: davide, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38232
llvm-svn: 314970
Summary:
FastISel::hasTrivialKill() was the only user of the "IntPtrTy" version of
Cast::isNoopCast(). According to review comments in D37894 we could instead
use the "DataLayout" version of the method, and thus get rid of the
"IntPtrTy" versions of isNoopCast() completely.
With the above done, the remaining isNoopCast() could then be simplified
a bit more.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38497
llvm-svn: 314969
Summary:
The arg1 logging handler changed in compiler-rt to start writing a
different type for entries encountered when logging the first argument
of XRay-instrumented functions. This change allows the trace loader to
support reading these record types as well as prepare for when the
basic (naive) mode implementation starts writing down the argument
payloads.
Without this change, binaries with arg1 logging support enabled start
writing unreadable logs for any of the XRay tracing tools.
Reviewers: pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38550
llvm-svn: 314967
Adds the option 'new-pass-manager' to the gold pluggin to enable using the
new pass manager during the lto/thinlto link step.
Patch by Graham Yiu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38517
llvm-svn: 314963
We can support ashr similar to lshr, if we know that none of the shifted in bits are used. In that case SimplifyDemandedBits would normally convert it to lshr. But that conversion doesn't happen if the shift has additional users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38521
llvm-svn: 314945
Summary:
If the pointer width is 32 bits and the calculated GEP offset is
negative, we call APInt::getLimitedValue(), which does a
*zero*-extension of the offset. That's wrong -- we should do an sext.
Fixes a bug introduced in rL314362 and found by Evgeny Astigeevich.
Reviewers: efriedma
Subscribers: sanjoy, javed.absar, llvm-commits, eastig
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38557
llvm-svn: 314935
But now include a check for CPU_COUNT so we still build on 10 year old
versions of glibc.
Original message:
Use sched_getaffinity instead of std:🧵:hardware_concurrency.
The issue with std:🧵:hardware_concurrency is that it forwards
to libc and some implementations (like glibc) don't take thread
affinity into consideration.
With this change a llvm program that can execute in only 2 cores will
use 2 threads, even if the machine has 32 cores.
This makes benchmarking a lot easier, but should also help if someone
doesn't want to use all cores for compilation for example.
llvm-svn: 314931
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D38138.
I fixed the capitalization of some functions because we're changing those
lines anyway and that helped verify that we weren't accidentally dropping
any options by using default param values.
llvm-svn: 314930
Function isLoweredToCall can only accept non-null function pointer, but a function pointer can be null for indirect function call. So check it before calling isLoweredToCall from getInstructionLatency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38204
llvm-svn: 314927
Recommitting r314517 with the fix for handling ConstantExpr.
Original commit message:
Currently, getGEPCost() returns TCC_FREE whenever a GEP is a legal addressing
mode in the target. However, since it doesn't check its actual users, it will
return FREE even in cases where the GEP cannot be folded away as a part of
actual addressing mode. For example, if an user of the GEP is a call
instruction taking the GEP as a parameter, then the GEP may not be folded in
isel.
llvm-svn: 314923
Summary:
This reverts D38481. The change breaks systems with older versions of glibc. It
injects a use of CPU_COUNT() from sched.h without checking to ensure that the
function exists first.
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 314922
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Somehow a few massive errors slipped though the cracks of testing.
1. The code in Segment::finalize was left over from the old layout
algorithm. In certain situations this would cause very strange issues
with segment layout. For instance in the shift-segments.test case it
would cause the second segment to have the same offset as the first.
2. In debugging this I discovered another issue. Namely section alignment
was not being computed based on Section->Align but instead
Section->Offset which is bizarre and makes no sense. I have no clue how
it worked in the first place. This issue is also fixed
3. Fixing #2 exposed a bug where things were not being written past the end
of the file that technically should have been. This was because in
certain cases (like overlapping-segments) the end of the file wouldn't
always be bumped if the offset could be chosen relative to an existing
segment that already had it's offset chosen. For fully nested segments
this is fine but for overlapping segments this leaves the end of the
file short. So I changed how the offset is bumped when looping though
segments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38436
llvm-svn: 314918
Summary:
This patch teaches `DT.applyUpdates` to take the fast when applying zero or just one update and makes it not run the internal batch updater machinery.
With this patch, it should no longer make sense to have a special check in user's code that checks the update sequence size before applying them, e.g.
```
if (!MyUpdates.empty())
DT.applyUpdates(MyUpdates);
```
or
```
if (MyUpdates.size() == 1)
if (...)
DT.insertEdge(...)
else
DT.deleteEdge(...)
```
Reviewers: dberlin, brzycki, davide, grosser, sanjoy
Reviewed By: dberlin, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38541
llvm-svn: 314917
Summary:
normpath() was being called on an empty string and appended to
the environment variable in the case where the environment variable
was unset. This led to ":." being appended to the path, since
normpath() of an empty string is '.', presumably to represent cwd.
Reviewers: zturner, sqlbyme, modocache
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38542
llvm-svn: 314915
This patch redefines the MOVSS/MOVSD instructions to take VR128 as its second input. This allows the MOVSS/SD->BLEND commute to work without requiring a COPY to be inserted.
This should fix PR33079
Overall this looks to be an improvement in the generated code. I haven't checked the EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build but I'll do that and update with results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38449
llvm-svn: 314914
r314857 changed the CFG that resulted in the flaky test MachineBranchProb.ll to
fail the bots again. Marking it as unsupported for ARM/AArch64 again until we
find the cause.
llvm-svn: 314912
Before the patch this was in Analysis. Moving it to IR and making it implicit
part of LLVMContext::diagnose allows the full opt-remark facility to be used
outside passes e.g. the pass manager. Jessica is planning to use this to
report function size after each pass. The same could be used for time
reports.
Tested with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=On.
llvm-svn: 314909
We can likely remove most of these as redundant in the near future,
but I'm trying to make sure I don't introduce any regressions with D38514.
llvm-svn: 314907
Early out from vector shift by immediates that will exceed eltsize - don't bother making an unnecessary ComputeNumSignBits recursive call.
llvm-svn: 314903
Previously, on long branches (relative jumps of >4 kB), an assertion
failure was hit, as AVRInstrInfo::insertIndirectBranch was not
implemented. Despite its name, it is called by the branch relaxator
for *all* unconditional jumps.
Patch by Thomas Backman.
llvm-svn: 314891
In some cases, the code generator attempts to generate instructions such as:
lddw r24, Y+63
which expands to:
ldd r24, Y+63
ldd r25, Y+64 # Oops! This is actually ld r25, Y in the binary
This commit limits the first offset to 62, and thus the second to 63.
It also updates some asserts in AVRExpandPseudoInsts.cpp, including for
INW and OUTW, which appear to be unused.
Patch by Thomas Backman.
llvm-svn: 314890
This adds diagnostics for invalid immediate operands to the MOVW and MOVT
instructions (ARM and Thumb).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31879
llvm-svn: 314888
Currently, our diagnostics for assembly operands are not consistent.
Some start with (for example) "immediate operand must be ...",
and some with "operand must be an immediate ...". I think the latter
form is preferable for a few reasons:
* It's unambiguous that it is referring to the expected type of operand, not
the type the user provided. For example, the user could provide an register
operand, and get a message taking about an operand is if it is already an
immediate, just not in the accepted range.
* It allows us to have a consistent style once we add diagnostics for operands
that could take two forms, for example a label or pc-relative memory operand.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36689
llvm-svn: 314887
