The DWARF3 documentation had inconsistency concerning the reserved range
for unit length values. The issue was fixed in DWARF4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64622
llvm-svn: 366190
The first argument in the constructor was ignored, and the remaining
arguments were always passed as their defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64407
llvm-svn: 366188
The canonical GNU form of JALR resembles a load/store instruction rather
than placing the immediate offset as a separate argument, so match this
behaviour. Also add parser-only aliases for the three-operand form, and
add other shorter aliases also emitted by GNU tools.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55277
Patch by James Clarke.
llvm-svn: 366179
RISCVAsmBackend::shouldInsertExtraNopBytesForCodeAlign() assumed that the
align specified would be greater than or equal to the minimum nop length, but
that is not always the case - for example if a user specifies ".align 0" in
assembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63274
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 366176
The bool result of shouldInsertExtraNopBytesForCodeAlign() is not checked but
the returned nop count is unconditionally read even though it could be
uninitialized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63285
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 366175
Since PseudoCALL defines AsmString, it can be generated from assembly,
and so code-gen patterns should be defined separately to be consistent
with the style of the RISCV backend. Other pseudo-instructions exist
that have code-gen patterns defined directly, but these instructions are
purely for code-gen and cannot be written in assembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64012
Patch by James Clarke.
llvm-svn: 366174
Previously, this function didn't check the IsPCRel argument. But doing so is a
useful check for errors, and also seemingly necessary for FK_Data_4 (which we
produce a R_RISCV_32_PCREL relocation for if IsPCRel).
Other than R_RISCV_32_PCREL, this should be NFC. Future exception handling
related patches will include tests that capture this behaviour.
llvm-svn: 366172
Use the MemoryVT field. This will be necessary for tablegen to
automatically handle patterns for GlobalISel.
Doesn't handle the d16 lo/hi patterns. Those are a special case since
it involvess the custom node type.
llvm-svn: 366168
In LLDB, when parsing type units, we don't need to parse the whole line
table. Instead, we only need to parse the "support files" from the line
table prologue.
To make that possible, this patch moves the respective functions from
the LineTable into the Prologue. Because I don't think users of the
LineTable should have to know that these files come from the Prologue,
I've left the original methods in place, and made them redirect to the
LineTable.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64774
llvm-svn: 366164
Summary:
- As the pointer stripping could trace through `addrspacecast` now, need
to sext/trunc the offset to ensure it has the same width as the
pointer after stripping.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64768
llvm-svn: 366162
In LLDB, when parsing type units, we don't need to parse the whole line
table. Instead, we only need to parse the "support files" from the line
table prologue.
To make that possible, this patch moves the respective functions from
the LineTable into the Prologue. Because I don't think users of the
LineTable should have to know that these files come from the Prologue,
I've left the original methods in place, and made them redirect to the
LineTable.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64774
llvm-svn: 366158
As there are some reported miscompiles with AVX512 and performance regressions
in Eigen. Verified with the original committer and testcases will be forthcoming.
This reverts commit r364964.
llvm-svn: 366154
We mostly avoid sub with immediate but there are a couple cases that can create them. One is the add 128, %rax -> sub -128, %rax trick in isel. The other is when a SUB immediate gets created for a compare where both the flags and the subtract value is used. If we are unable to linearize the SelectionDAG to satisfy the flag user and the sub result user from the same instruction, we will clone the sub immediate for the two uses. The one that produces flags will eventually become a compare. The other will have its flag output dead, and could then be considered for LEA creation.
I added additional test cases to add.ll to show the the sub -128 trick gets converted to LEA and a case where we don't need to convert it.
This showed up in the current codegen for PR42571.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64574
llvm-svn: 366151
Summary:
This adds missing utility methods and copy instruction handling for
`exnref` type and also adds tests.
`tee` instruction tests are missing because `isTee` is currently only
used in ExplicitLocals pass and testing that pass in mir requires
serialization of stackified registers in mir files, which is a bit
nontrivial because `MachineFunctionInfo` only has info of vreg numbers
(which are large integers) but not the mir's register numbers. But this
change is quite trivial anyway.
Reviewers: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64705
llvm-svn: 366149
Summary:
We agreed to rename `except_ref` to `exnref` for consistency with other
reference types in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/79. This also
renames WebAssemblyInstrExceptRef.td to WebAssemblyInstrRef.td in order
to use the file for other reference types in future.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64703
llvm-svn: 366145
This reverts r366142 (git commit 67cee1dc7ee285b03372eb818a3894d35efa7394)
The test is failing on the Windows buildbots. Reverting while I
investigate.
llvm-svn: 366144
Creates universal binary output file from input files. Currently uses
hard coded value for alignment. Want to get the create functionality
approved before implementing the alignment function.
Patch by Anusha Basana <anusha.basana@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64102
llvm-svn: 366142
Summary:
This deletes the ll templates from the functions because they don't need
them (mir files need ll templates only when they have function calls or
BB names that are not numbers).
This also renames the filename to `reg-copy.mir`, because I'm planning
to add some more `reg-*.mir` soon.
Reviewers: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64704
llvm-svn: 366140
Summary:
These are emitted as identifiers by the InstPrinter, so we should
parse them as such. These could potentially clash with symbols of
the same name, but that is out of our (the WebAssembly backend) control.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64770
llvm-svn: 366139
Summary:
Enable hoisting and merging m0 defs that are initialized with the same
immediate value. Fixes bug where removed instructions are not considered
to interfere with other inits, and make sure to not hoist inits before block
prologues.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64766
llvm-svn: 366135
We already do this for the flat and DS instructions, although it is
certainly uglier and more verbose.
This will allow using separate pattern definitions for extload and
zextload. Currently we get away with using a single PatFrag with
custom predicate code to check if the extension type is a zextload or
anyextload. The generic mechanism the global isel emitter understands
treats these as mutually exclusive. I was considering making the
pattern emitter accept zextload or sextload extensions for anyextload
patterns, but in global isel, the different extending loads have
distinct opcodes, and there is currently no mechanism for an opcode
matcher to try multiple (and there probably is very little need for
one beyond this case).
llvm-svn: 366132
Summary:
There is currently a correctness issue when unrolling loops containing
callbr's where their indirect targets are being updated correctly to the
newly created labels, but their operands are not. This manifests in
unrolled loops where the second and subsequent copies of callbr
instructions have blockaddresses of the label from the first instance of
the unrolled loop, which would result in nonsensical runtime control
flow.
For now, conservatively do not unroll the loop. In the future, I think
we can pursue unrolling such loops provided we transform the cloned
callbr's operands correctly.
Such a transform and its legalities are being discussed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64101
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42489
Link: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clang-built-linux/z-hRWP9KqPI
Reviewers: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits, pirama, kees, nathanchance, E5ten, craig.topper, chandlerc, glider, void, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64368
llvm-svn: 366130
This was failing to import the AMDGPU truncstore patterns. The
truncating stores from 32-bit to 8/16 were then somehow being
incorrectly selected to a 4-byte store.
A separate check is emitted for the LLT size in comparison to the
specific memory VT, which looks strange to me but makes sense based on
the hierarchy of PatFrags used for the default truncstore PatFrags.
llvm-svn: 366129
Currently AMDGPU uses a CodePatPred to check address spaces from the
MachineMemOperand. Introduce a new first class property so that the
existing patterns can be easily modified to uses the new generated
predicate, which will also be handled for GlobalISel.
I would prefer these to match against the pointer type of the
instruction, but that would be difficult to get working with
SelectionDAG compatbility. This is much easier for now and will avoid
a painful tablegen rewrite for all the loads and stores.
I'm also not sure if there's a better way to encode multiple address
spaces in the table, rather than putting the number to expect.
llvm-svn: 366128
If a 1-bit value is in a 32-bit VGPR, the scalar opcodes set SCC to
whether the result is 0. If the inputs are SCC, these can be copied to
a 32-bit SGPR to produce an SCC result.
llvm-svn: 366125
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues
using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension.
It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation
of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new
sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different
performance properties.
The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one
later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and
StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be
inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the
new sanitize_memtag attribute.
Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169
llvm-svn: 366123
This is a hack until I come up with a better way of dealing with the
pseudo-register banks used for boolean values. If the use instruction
constrains the register, the selector for the def instruction won't
see that the bank was VCC. A 1-bit SReg_32 is could ambiguously have
been SCCRegBank or VCCRegBank in wave32.
This is necessary to successfully select branches with and and/or/xor
condition.
llvm-svn: 366120
The extra test change is correct, although how it arrives there is a
bug that needs work. With wave32, the test for isVCC ambiguously
reports true for an SCC or VCC source. A new allocatable pseudo
register class for SCC may be necesssary.
llvm-svn: 366119
Summary:
Processing of command-line definition of variable and logic around
implicit not directives both reuse parsing code that expects a line
number to be defined. So far, a special line number of 0 was used for
those users of the parsing code where a line number does not make sense.
This commit instead represents line numbers as Optional values so that
they can be None for those cases.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64639
llvm-svn: 366109
Summary:
This is a follow up to D64032. Afterwards if building utils is disabled
and cross compilation is attempted, CMake will complain that adding
`install()` directives to targets with EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL set is "undefined".
Indeed, it appears depending on the CMake version and the selected
Generator, the install rule will error because the underlying target isn't
built. Fix that by not adding the install rule if building utils is not
requested. Note that this doesn't prevent building tblgen as a
dependency in not cross-build, even if building tools is disabled.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64225
llvm-svn: 366108
The construction was explained in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44810?id=139526#inline-391999 but reading the code
shouldn't require hunting down old reviews to understand it.
The precomputed list was missing an entry for the empty list case, and
one entry at the very end. (The current last entry is the last one where
3 * BucketCount fits in a signed int, but the reference implementation
uses unsigneds as far as I can tell, so there's room for one more entry.)
No behavior change for inputs seen in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64738
llvm-svn: 366107
We need to make sure that we are sensibly dealing with vectors of types v2i64
and v2f64, even if most of the time we cannot generate native operations for
them. This mostly adds a lot of testing, plus fixes up a couple of the issues
found. And, or and xor can be legal for v2i64, and shifts combining needs a
slight fixup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64316
llvm-svn: 366106
