These were the cause of a verifier error when building 7zip with
-verify-machineinstrs. Running 'make check' with the verifier
triggered the same error on the test here so i've updated the test
to run the verifier on one of its runs instead of adding a new one.
While looking at this code, there was a stale comment that these
instructions were only used for disassembly. This probably used to
be the case, but they are now used in the 'ARM load / store optimization pass' too.
This reapplies r242300 which was reverted in r242428 due to bot failures.
Ultimately those failures were spurious and completely unrelated to this commit. I reverted this
at the time because it was thought to be at fault.
llvm-svn: 250969
There may be other use operands that also need their kill flags cleared.
This happens in a few tests when SIFoldOperands is moved after
PeepholeOptimizer.
PeepholeOptimizer rewrites cases that look like:
%vreg0 = ...
%vreg1 = COPY %vreg0
use %vreg1<kill>
%vreg2 = COPY %vreg0
use %vreg2<kill>
to use the earlier source to
%vreg0 = ...
use %vreg0
use %vreg0
Currently SIFoldOperands sees the copied registers, so there is
only one use. So far I haven't managed to come up with a test
that currently has multiple uses of a foldable VGPR -> VGPR copy.
llvm-svn: 250960
This was checking for a variety of situations that should
never happen. This saves a tiny bit of compile time.
We should not be selecting instructions with invalid operands in the
first place. Most of the time for registers copys are inserted
to the correct operand register class.
For VOP3, since all operand types are supported and literal
constants never are, we just need to verify the constant bus
requirements (all immediates should be legal inline ones).
The only possibly tricky case to maybe worry about is if when
legalizing operands in moveToVALU with s_add_i32 and similar
instructions. If the original s_add_i32 had a literal constant
and we need to replace it with v_add_i32_e64 we would have an
unsupported literal operand. However, I don't think we should worry
about that because SIFoldOperands should handle folding literal
constant operands into the SALU instructions based on the uses.
At SIFoldOperands time, the legality and profitability of
operand types is a bit different.
llvm-svn: 250951
Summary:
Previously, we were inserting an InlineAsm statement for each line of the
inline assembly. This works for GAS but it triggers prologue/epilogue
emission when IAS is in use. This caused:
.set noreorder
.cpload $25
to be emitted as:
.set push
.set reorder
.set noreorder
.set pop
.set push
.set reorder
.cpload $25
.set pop
which led to assembler errors and caused the test to fail.
The whitespace-after-comma changes included in this patch are necessary to
match the output when IAS is in use.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: rkotler, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13653
llvm-svn: 250895
Summary:
The forwards compatibility strategy employed by MIPS is to consider registers
to be infinitely sign-extended. Then on ISA's with a wider register, the result
of existing instructions are sign-extended to register width and zero-extended
counterparts are added. copy_u.w on MSA32 and copy_u.w on MSA64 violate this
strategy and we have therefore corrected the MSA specs to fix this.
We still keep track of sign/zero-extension during legalization but we now
match copy_s.[wd] where required.
No change required to clang since __builtin_msa_copy_u_[wd] will map to
copy_s.[wd] where appropriate for the target.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13472
llvm-svn: 250887
C/C++ code can declare an extern function, which will show up as an import in WebAssembly's output. It's expected that the linker will resolve these, and mark unresolved imports as call_import (I have a patch which does this in wasmate).
llvm-svn: 250875
Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
This wasn't doing anything useful. They weren't explicitly used
anywhere, and the RegScavenger ignores reserved registers.
This for some reason caused a random scheduling change in the test.
Getting the check lines to pass is too frustrating, and there's probably
not too much value in checking the vector case's operands N times.
llvm-svn: 250794
There are two things out of the ordinary in this commit. First, I made
a loop obviously "infinite" in HexagonInstrInfo.cpp. After checking if
an instruction was at the beginning of a basic block (in which case,
`break`), the loop decremented and checked the iterator for `nullptr` as
the loop condition. This has never been possible (the prev pointers are
always been circular, so even with the weird ilist/iplist
implementation, this isn't been possible), so I removed the condition.
Second, in HexagonAsmPrinter.cpp there was another case of comparing a
`MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator` against `MachineBasicBlock::end()`
(which returns `MachineBasicBlock::iterator`). While not incorrect,
it's fragile. I switched this to `::instr_end()`.
All that said, no functionality change intended here.
llvm-svn: 250778
Convert two halfword loads into a single 32-bit word load with bitfield extract
instructions. For example :
ldrh w0, [x2]
ldrh w1, [x2, #2]
becomes
ldr w0, [x2]
ubfx w1, w0, #16, #16
and w0, w0, #ffff
llvm-svn: 250719
- Isolate the check for the existence of a stack frame into hasFP.
- Implement getFrameIndexReference for DWARF address computation.
- Use getFrameIndexReference for offset computation in eliminateFrameIndex.
- Preserve debug information for dynamically allocated stack objects.
- Prefer FP to access local objects at -O0.
- Add experimental code to skip allocframe when not strictly necessary
(disabled by default).
llvm-svn: 250718
Emit the CFI instructions after all code transformation have been done.
This will avoid any interference between CFI instructions and packetization.
llvm-svn: 250714
The mapping of these two intrinsics in ARMInstrInfo.td had a small
omission which lead to their operands not being validated/transformed
before being lowered into usat and ssat instructions. This can cause
incorrect instructions to be emitted.
I've also added tests for the remaining two saturating arithmatic
intrinsics @llvm.arm.qadd and @llvm.arm.qsub as they are missing
codegen tests.
llvm-svn: 250697
Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case.
Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850
llvm-svn: 250686
