I noticed this missed bswap optimization in the CGP memcmp() expansion,
and then I saw that we don't have the fold in InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34763
llvm-svn: 306980
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
llvm-svn: 306978
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
The 32-bit shuffles are a bit tricky and will be dealt with in a later patch
llvm-svn: 306977
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
llvm-svn: 306976
this patch updates the cost of addq\subq (add\subtract of vectors of 64bits)
based on the performance numbers of SLM arch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33983
llvm-svn: 306974
This is NFC after rerunning the "update_llc_test_checks.py" tool on the CodeGen X86 tests in order to submit a patch.
Minor differences due to added "End of Function" lines.
Reviewers: zvi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34933
llvm-svn: 306973
Summary: Support G_GLOBAL_VALUE operation. For now most of the PIC configurations not implemented yet.
Reviewers: zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34738
Conflicts:
test/CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/regbankselect-X86_64.mir
llvm-svn: 306972
Summary:
Support vector type G_UNMERGE_VALUES selection.
For now G_UNMERGE_VALUES marked as legal for any type, so nothing to do in legalizer.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, guyblank, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33665
llvm-svn: 306971
Summary:
I came across this while thinking about what would happen if one of the operands in this xor pattern was itself a inverted (A & ~B) ^ (~A & B)-> (A^B).
The patterns here assume that the (~a | ~b) will be demorganed to ~(a & b) first. Though I wonder if there's a multiple use case that would prevent the demorgan.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34870
llvm-svn: 306967
Summary:
This reverts commit 51931072a7c9a52540baf76fc30ef391d2529a2f.
This revert was originally done because the integrations of the new
WindowsResource library into LLD was causing error in chromium, due to
bugs in how resource sections were handled. These bugs were fixed,
meaning that the features may be reintegrated.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34922
llvm-svn: 306941
This enables us to ensure better LTO and code generation in the face of module linking.
Remove a report_fatal_error from the TargetMachine and replace it with an assert in ARMSubtarget - and remove the test that depended on the error. The assertion will still fire in the case that we were reporting before, but error reporting needs to be in front end tools if possible for options parsing.
llvm-svn: 306939
This commit pretty much rolls back the logic added in r306495
as in the testcase provided we simplify an `icmp` looking through
a PHI that hasn't been mapped yet.
I think instsimplify shouldn't do threading over select/phis or
just looking through phis in general, but this is what we have
now. Also, add a test to prevent this from happening in case somebody
wants to modify this code again.
Briefly discussed with Kyle Butt (thanks Kyle!).
llvm-svn: 306938
With fix for use-after-free errors. We can't add the new branch and
remove the old one until we are done with the Builder constructed for
the block.
llvm-svn: 306937
Summary:
vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth is generally useful in terms of performance. I've tested the impact of changing this to default on speccpu benchmarks on sandybridge machines. The result shows non-negative impact:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 26.84 -0.31%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 46.19 +0.89%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 42.92 -0.44%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 38.57 -2.25%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 24.54 -0.76%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.08 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 47.58 -0.99%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.06 +1.87%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 22.65 -0.12%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 33.69 +4.97%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.43 +1.70%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 23.02 -0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.57 -0.43%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 40.35 +0.27%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.96 +0.06%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.4 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 27.91 -0.08%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 57.47 -0.20%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.52 +1.35%
geometric mean +0.29%
The regression on 453.povray seems real, but is due to secondary effects as all hot functions are bit-identical with and without the flag.
I started this patch to consult upstream opinions on this. It will be greatly appreciated if the community can help test the performance impact of this change on other architectures so that we can decided if this should be target-dependent.
Reviewers: hfinkel, mkuper, davidxl, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: rengolin, sanjoy, javed.absar, bjope, dorit, magabari, RKSimon, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33341
llvm-svn: 306933
This reverts commit r306907 and reapplies the patches in the title.
The patches used to make one of the
CodeGen/ARM/2011-02-07-AntidepClobber.ll test to fail because of a
missing null check.
llvm-svn: 306919
Summary:
removePartialRedundency optimization introduces a state in the
RegisterCoalescer where an instruction pointed to in the WorkList
is deleted from the MBB and then removed from the ErasedList.
This patch updates the ErasedList to be used globally by not erasing
erased Instructions from it to solve the problem.
The patch also accounts for the case where an Instruction was previously
deleted and the same memory was reused by BuildMI to create a new instruction.
Reviewers: kparzysz, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34902
llvm-svn: 306915
Summary:
Add an option to prevent diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for
large codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size. Discussion of
this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, fhahn, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867
llvm-svn: 306912
This reverts commit r306894.
Revert "[Dominators] Add NearestCommonDominator verification"
This reverts commit r306893.
Revert "[Dominators] Keep tree level in DomTreeNode and use it to find NCD and answer dominance queries"
This reverts commit r306892.
llvm-svn: 306907
Summary:
The lit test formats use largely the same logic for discovering tests. There are
some superficial differences in the logic, which seem reasonable enough to
handle in a single routine.
At a high level, the common goal is "look for files that end with one of these
suffixes, and skip anything starting with a dot." The balance of the logic
specific to ShTest and GoogleTest collapses quite a bit, so that
getTestsInDirectory is only a couple of lines around a call to the new function.
Reviewers: zturner, MatzeB, modocache
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34855
llvm-svn: 306895
Summary: This patch teaches IteratedDominanceFrontier to use the level information stored in DomTreeNodes instead of calculating it manually.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34703
llvm-svn: 306894
Summary:
This patch adds another verification function for checking correctness of findNearestCommonDominator.
For every edge from U to V in the input graph, `NCD(U, V) == IDom(V) or V` -- the new function checks this condition.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34575
llvm-svn: 306893
