These currently always require a type parameter. The bitcode reader
already upgrades old bitcode without the type parameter to use the
pointee type.
In cases where the caller does not have byval but the callee does, we
need to follow CallBase::paramHasAttr() and also look at the callee for
the byval type so that CallBase::isByValArgument() and
CallBase::getParamByValType() are in sync. Do the same for preallocated.
While we're here add a corresponding version for inalloca since we'll
need it soon.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104663
The Legalizer expands the operations of urem/srem into a div+mul+sub or divrem
when those are legal/custom. This patch changes the cost-model to reflect that
cost.
Since there is no 'divrem' Instruction in LLVM IR, the cost of divrem
is assumed to be the same as div+mul+sub since the three operations will
need to be executed at runtime regardless.
Patch co-authored by David Sherwood (@david-arm)
Reviewed By: RKSimon, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103799
Before we replaced value by registering all their uses. However, as we
replace a value old uses become stale. We now replace values explicitly
and keep track of "new values" when doing so to avoid replacing only
uses in stale/old values but not their replacements.
We often need to deal with the value lattice that contains none and
undef as special values. A simple helper makes this much nicer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103857
When we do simplification via AAPotentialValues or AAValueConstantRange
we need to simplify the operands of an instruction we deconstruct first.
This does not only improve the result, see for example range.ll, but is
required as we allow outside AAs to provide simplification rules via
callbacks. If we do ignore the simplification rules and base other
simplifications on the IR instead we can create an inconsistent state.
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
This patch emits DBG_INSTR_REFs for two remaining flavours of variable
locations that weren't supported: copies, and inter-block VRegs. There are
still some locations that must be represented by DBG_VALUE such as
constants, but they're mostly independent of optimisations.
For variable locations that refer to values defined in different blocks,
vregs are allocated before isel begins, but the defining instruction
might not exist until late in isel. To get around this, emit
DBG_INSTR_REFs in a "half done" state, where the first operand refers to a
VReg. Then at the end of isel, patch these back up to refer to
instructions, using the finalizeDebugInstrRefs method.
Copies are something that I complained about the original RFC, and I
really don't want to have to put instruction numbers on copies. They don't
define a value: they move them. To address this isel, salvageCopySSA
interprets:
* COPYs,
* SUBREG_TO_REG,
* Anything that isCopyInstr thinks is a copy.
And follows chains of copies back to the defining instruction that they
read from. This relies on any physical registers that COPYs read being
defined in the same block, or being entry-block arguments. For the former
we can put an instruction number on the defining instruction; for the
latter we can drop a DBG_PHI that reads the incoming value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88896
This patch adds a TTI function, isElementTypeLegalForScalableVector, to query
whether it is possible to vectorize a given element type. This is called by
isLegalToVectorizeInstTypesForScalable to reject scalable vectorization if
any of the instruction types in the loop are unsupported, e.g:
int foo(__int128_t* ptr, int N)
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(4, scalable)
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i)
ptr[i] = ptr[i] + 42;
This example currently crashes if we attempt to vectorize since i128 is not a
supported type for scalable vectorization.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102253
This patch implaments the load and reserve and store conditional
builtins for the PowerPC target, in order to have feature parody with
xlC on AIX.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105236
This patch adds a new ShuffleKind SK_Splice and then handle the cost in
getShuffleCost, as in experimental.vector.reverse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104630
Summary: The patch adds the StringTable dumping to
llvm-readobj. Currently only XCOFF is supported.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104613
This API is not compatible with opaque pointers, the method
accepting an explicit pointer element type should be used instead.
Thankfully there were few in-tree users. The BPF case still ends
up using the pointer element type for now and needs something like
D105407 to avoid doing so.
Same as other CreateLoad-style APIs, these need an explicit type
argument to support opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105395
Compiling LLVM with Clang modules and libc++ identified that
`Support/Printable.h` and `ADL/SmallVector.h` were using features that
live in these headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105402
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854ab4458fd509447359066ea3578b494.
It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
We're trying to match a few pointer computation patterns here for
re-association opportunities.
1) Isolating a constant operand to be on the RHS, e.g.:
G_PTR_ADD(BASE, G_ADD(X, C)) -> G_PTR_ADD(G_PTR_ADD(BASE, X), C)
2) Folding two constants in each sub-tree as long as such folding
doesn't break a legal addressing mode.
G_PTR_ADD(G_PTR_ADD(BASE, C1), C2) -> G_PTR_ADD(BASE, C1+C2)
AArch64 code size improvements on CTMark with -Os:
Program before after diff
pairlocalalign 251048 251044 -0.0%
consumer-typeset 421820 421812 -0.0%
kc 431348 431320 -0.0%
SPASS 413404 413300 -0.0%
clamscan 384396 384220 -0.0%
tramp3d-v4 370640 370412 -0.1%
lencod 432096 431772 -0.1%
bullet 479400 478796 -0.1%
sqlite3 288504 288072 -0.1%
7zip-benchmark 573796 570768 -0.5%
Geomean difference -0.1%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105069
This change yields an additional 2% size reduction on an internal search
binary, and an additional 0.5% size reduction on fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104751
Add a flag so that target can choose to use AsmParser for parsing inline asm.
And set the flag by default for AIX.
-no-intergrated-as will override this default if specified explicitly.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105314
While this should not matter for most architectures (where the program
address space is 0), it is important for CHERI (and therefore Arm Morello).
We use address space 200 for all of our code pointers and without this
change we assert in the SelectionDAG handling of BlockAddress nodes.
It is also useful for AVR: previously programs targeting
AVR that attempt to read their own machine code
via a pointer to a label would instead read from RAM
using a pointer relative to the the start of program flash.
Reviewed By: dylanmckay, theraven
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48803
Reland of 31859f896.
This change implements new DAG notes GLOBAL_GET/GLOBAL_SET, and
lowering methods for load and stores of reference types from IR
globals. Once the lowering creates the new nodes, tablegen pattern
matches those and converts them to Wasm global.get/set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104797
This adds support for opaque pointers in intrinsic type checks
of IIT kind Pointer and PtrToElt.
This is less straight-forward than it might initially seem, because
we should only accept opaque pointers here in --force-opaque-pointers
mode. Otherwise, there would be more than one valid type signature
for a given intrinsic name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105155
This patch adds intrinsic definitions and SDNodes for predicated
load/store/gather/scatter, based on the work done in D57504.
Reviewed By: simoll, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99355
Very late in compilation, backends like X86 will perform optimisations like
this:
$cx = MOV16rm $rax, ...
->
$rcx = MOV64rm $rax, ...
Widening the load from 16 bits to 64 bits. SEeing how the lower 16 bits
remain the same, this doesn't affect execution. However, any debug
instruction reference to the defined operand now refers to a 64 bit value,
nto a 16 bit one, which might be unexpected. Elsewhere in codegen, there's
often this pattern:
CALL64pcrel32 @foo, implicit-def $rax
%0:gr64 = COPY $rax
%1:gr32 = COPY %0.sub_32bit
Where we want to refer to the definition of $eax by the call, but don't
want to refer the copies (they don't define values in the way
LiveDebugValues sees it). To solve this, add a subregister field to the
existing "substitutions" facility, so that we can describe a field within
a larger value definition. I would imagine that this would be used most
often when a value is widened, and we need to refer to the original,
narrower definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88891
Since I had some fun understanding how to properly use llvm::Expected<T> I added some code examples that I would have liked to see when learning to use it.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105014
Adds support for both synchronous and asynchronous calls to wrapper functions
using SPS (Simple Packed Serialization). Also adds support for wrapping
functions on the JIT side in SPS-based wrappers that can be called from the
executor.
These new methods simplify calls between the JIT and Executor, and will be used
in upcoming ORC runtime patches to enable communication between ORC and the
runtime.
This patch changes return type of tryCandidate from void to bool:
1. Methods in some targets already follow this convention.
2. This would help if some target wants to re-use generic code.
3. It looks more intuitive if these try-method returns the same type.
We may need to change return type of them from bool to some enum
further, to make it less confusing.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103951
This is a first step towards consistently using the term 'executor' for the
process that executes JIT'd code. I've opted for 'executor' as the preferred
term over 'target' as target is already heavily overloaded ("the target
machine for the executor" is much clearer than "the target machine for the
target").
This enables proper lowering of non-byte sized loads. We still aren't
faithfully preserving memory types everywhere, so the legality checks
still only consider the size.
Enable the emission of a GNU attributes section by reusing the code for
emitting the ARM build attributes section.
The GNU attributes follow the exact same section format as the ARM
BuildAttributes section, so this can be factored out and reused for GNU
attributes generally.
The immediate motivation for this is to emit a GNU attributes section for the
vector ABI on SystemZ (https://reviews.llvm.org/D105067).
Review: Logan Chien, Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102894
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
