Continuing on from D105780, this should be the last major bit of
attribute cleanup. Currently, LLParser implements attribute parsing
for functions, parameters and returns separately, enumerating all
supported (and unsupported) attributes each time. This patch
extracts the common parsing logic, and performs a check afterwards
whether the attribute is valid in the given position. Parameters
and returns are handled together, while function attributes need
slightly different logic to support attribute groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105938
It is possible that the remangled name for an intrinsic already exists with a different (and wrong) prototype within the module.
As the bitcode reader keeps both versions of all remangled intrinsics around for a longer time, this can result in a
crash, as can be seen in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50923
This patch makes 'remangleIntrinsicFunction' aware of this situation. When it is detected, it moves the version with the wrong prototype to a different name. That version will be removed anyway once the module is completely loaded.
With thanks to @asbirlea for reporting this issue when trying out an lto build with the full restrict patches, and @efriedma for suggesting a sane resolution mechanism.
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105118
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854ab4458fd509447359066ea3578b494.
It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
This adds support for opaque pointers in intrinsic type checks
of IIT kind Pointer and PtrToElt.
This is less straight-forward than it might initially seem, because
we should only accept opaque pointers here in --force-opaque-pointers
mode. Otherwise, there would be more than one valid type signature
for a given intrinsic name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105155
For example, byval.
Skip the type attribute auto-upgrade if we already have the type.
I've actually seen this error of the ValueEnumerator missing a type
attribute's type in a non-opaque pointer context.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105138
4506f614cb6983a16d117cf77a968608e66d7a5c fixed parsing of textual IR to
reject `ptr*`, but broke the auto-conversion of `i32**` to `ptr` with
`--force-opaque-pointers`.
Get that working again by refactoring LLParser::parseType to only send
`ptr`-spelled pointers into the type suffix logic when it's the return
of a function type. This also rejects `ptr addrspace(3) addrspace(2)`,
which 1e6303e60ca5af4fbe7ca728572fd65666a98271 invadvertently started
accepting. Just the default top-level error message for the
double-addrspace since I had trouble thinking of something nice;
probably it's fine as is (it doesn't look valid the way that `ptr*`
does).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105146
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
`distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
support.
The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.
The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.
A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:
!named = !{!0}
!0 = !DIExpression()
Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:
!named = !{!DIExpression()}
This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:
!named = !{!0}
; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
!0 = distinct !DIExpression()
Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
Currently, AsmWriter will stick uselistorder directives for global
values inside individual functions. This doesn't make a lot of sense,
and interacts badly with D104950, as use list order adjustments will
be performed while still working on a forward reference.
This patch instead always prints uselistorder directives for globals
at the module level. This isn't really compatible with the previously
used implementation approach. Rather than walking through all values
again, use the OrderMap (after stabilizing its order) to go through
all values and compute the use list shuffles for them. Classify them
per-function, or nullptr for globals.
Even independently of D104950, this seems to fix a few
verify-uselistorder failures. Conveniently, there is even a
pre-existing failing test that this fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104976
Fix the use-list-order for br instructions by setting the operands in
order of their index to match the use-list-order prediction. The case
where this matters is when there is a condition but the if-true and
if-false branches are identical.
Bug was found when reviewing failures pointed at by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104950. Fix is similar to
3cf415c6c367ced43175ebd1dc4bd9582c7f5376.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104959
Bring back the testcase dropped in
1e6303e60ca5af4fbe7ca728572fd65666a98271 and get it passing by checking
explicitly for `ptr*` in LLParser. Uses `Type::isOpaquePointerTy()` from
ad4bb8280952c2cacf497e30560ee94c119b36e0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104938
Do this by making opaque pointers a valid pointer element type,
for which we implicitly create an opaque pointer (moving the logic
from getPointerTo into PointerType::get).
We'll never create something like a "pointer to opaque pointer",
but accept it in the API, because a lot of code reasonably assumes
that you can create a pointer to pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104902
Fix the use-list-order for call and invoke instructions by setting the
operands in order of their index. This matches the use-list-order
prediction. Note that the verifier precludes sharing operands in callbr
(so there was no bug to fix), but that code was updated for consistency.
Bug was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104805
Add support for call of opaque pointer, currently only possible for
indirect calls.
This requires a bit of special casing in LLParser, as calls do not
specify the callee operand type explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740
Adjust assertions to use isOpaqueOrPointeeTypeMatches() and make
it return an opaque pointer result for an opaque base pointer. We
also need to enumerate the element type, as it is no longer
implicitly enumerated through the pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104655
For a GEP on an opaque pointer, also return an opaque pointer (or
vector of opaque pointer) result.
This requires explicitly enumerating the GEP source element type,
because it is now no longer implicitly enumerated as part of either
the source or result pointer types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104652
Verifying opaque pointer as function parameter when using with `byval`, `byref`,
`inalloca`, `preallocated`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104309
Ensure that we provide a `Module` when checking if a rename of an intrinsic is necessary.
This fixes the issue that was detected by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32288
(as mentioned by @fhahn), after committing D91250.
Note that the `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName` is being deprecated in favor of `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName2`.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99173
`non-global-value-max-name-size` is used by `Value` to cap the length of local value name. However, this flag is not considered by `LLParser`, which leads to unexpected `use of undefined value error`. The fix is to move the responsibility of capping the length to `ValueSymbolTable`.
The test is the one provided by [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45899 | Mikael in the bug report ]].
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102707
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.
Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.
Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
In the WebAssembly target, we would like to allow alloca in two address
spaces. The alloca instruction already has an address space argument,
but the verifier asserts that the address space of an alloca is the
default alloca address space from the datalayout. This patch removes
this restriction. Targets that would like to impose additional
restrictions should do so via target-specific verification passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101045
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
No verifier changes needed, the verifier currently doesn't check that
the pointer operand's pointee type matches the GEP type. There is a
similar check in GetElementPtrInst::Create() though.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102744
Don't check that types match when the pointer operand is an opaque
pointer.
I would separate the Assembler and Verifier changes, but
verify-uselistorder in the Assembler test ends up running the verifier.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102450
The opaque pointer type is essentially just a normal pointer type with a
null pointee type.
This also adds support for the opaque pointer type to the bitcode
reader/writer, as well as to textual IR.
To avoid confusion with existing pointer types, we disallow creating a
pointer to an opaque pointer.
Opaque pointer types should not be widely used at this point since many
parts of LLVM still do not support them. The next steps are to add some
very simple use cases of opaque pointers to make sure they work, then
start pretending that all pointers are opaque pointers and see what
breaks.
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150359.html
Reviewed By: dblaikie, dexonsmith, pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101704
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
Perform DSOLocal propagation within summary list of every GV. This
avoids the repeated query of this information during function
importing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96398
Imported functions and variable get the visibility from the module supplying the
definition. However, non-imported definitions do not get the visibility from
(ELF) the most constraining visibility among all modules (Mach-O) the visibility
of the prevailing definition.
This patch
* adds visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
* computes the result visibility and propagates it to all definitions
Protected/hidden can imply dso_local which can enable some optimizations (this
is stronger than GVFlags::DSOLocal because the implied dso_local can be
leveraged for ELF -shared while default visibility dso_local has to be cleared
for ELF -shared).
Note: we don't have summaries for declarations, so for ELF if a declaration has
the most constraining visibility, the result visibility may not be that one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92900
DefaultAttrIntrinsics was introduced to add very common attributes to a
large set of intrinsics.
Currently the added attributes include:
nofree nosync nounwind willreturn
I think those should hold for most AArch64 target intrinsics, but
there are too many to check manually. This patch makes most AArch64 target
intrinsics DefaultAttrsIntrinsics.
Some notable exceptions I think are exclusive loads and stores as well
as the memory barrier intrinsics, for which nosync does not apply I
think.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94687
The main change is to add a 'IsDecl' field to DIModule so
that when IsDecl is set to true, the debug info entry generated
for the module would be marked as a declaration. That way, the debugger
would look up the definition of the module in the gloabl scope.
Please see the comments in llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dimodule.ll
for what the debug info entries would look like.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93462
Currently the backend special cases x86_intrcc and treats the first
parameter as byval. Make the IR require byval for this parameter to
remove this special case, and avoid the dependence on the pointee
element type.
Fixes bug 46672.
I'm not sure the IR is enforcing all the calling convention
constraints. clang seems to ignore the attribute for empty parameter
lists, but the IR tolerates it.
This is similar to the existing alloca and program address spaces (D37052)
and should be used when creating/accessing global variables.
We need this in our CHERI fork of LLVM to place all globals in address space 200.
This ensures that values are accessed using CHERI load/store instructions
instead of the normal MIPS/RISC-V ones.
The problem this is trying to fix is that most of the time the type of
globals is created using a simple PointerType::getUnqual() (or ::get() with
the default address-space value of 0). This does not work for us and we get
assertion/compilation/instruction selection failures whenever a new call
is added that uses the default value of zero.
In our fork we have removed the default parameter value of zero for most
address space arguments and use DL.getProgramAddressSpace() or
DL.getGlobalsAddressSpace() whenever possible. If this change is accepted,
I will upstream follow-up patches to use DL.getGlobalsAddressSpace() instead
of relying on the default value of 0 for PointerType::get(), etc.
This patch and the follow-up changes will not have any functional changes
for existing backends with the default globals address space of zero.
A follow-up commit will change the default globals address space for
AMDGPU to 1.
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70947
When generating the use-list order, also consider value uses that are
operands which are wrapped in metadata; e.g. llvm.dbg.value operands.
This fixes PR36778. The test case is based on the reproducer from that
report.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53758
This adds the LLVM IR attribute `mustprogress` as defined in LangRef through D86233. This attribute will be applied to functions with in languages like C++ where forward progress is guaranteed. Functions without this attribute are not required to make progress.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85393
This reverts commit eb9f7c28e5fe6d75fed3587023e17f2997c8024b.
Previously this was incorrectly handling linking of the contained
type, so this merges the fixes from D88973.
