For 64bit ABIs it is common practice to use relative Jump Tables with
potentially different relocation bases. As the logic for the jump table
itself doesn't depend on the relocation base, make it easier for targets
to use the generic logic. Start by dropping the now redundant MIPS logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26578
llvm-svn: 286951
The generic infrastructure to compute the Newton series for reciprocal and
reciprocal square root was conceived to allow a target to compute the series
itself. However, the original code did not properly consider this condition
if returned by a target. This patch addresses the issues to allow a target
to compute the series on its own.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22975
llvm-svn: 286523
We were failing to extract a constant splat shift value if the shifted value was being masked.
The (shl (and (setcc) N01CV) N1CV) -> (and (setcc) N01CV<<N1CV) combine was unnecessarily preventing this.
llvm-svn: 286454
Fixed an issue with vector usage of TargetLowering::isConstTrueVal / TargetLowering::isConstFalseVal boolean result matching.
The comment said we shouldn't handle constant splat vectors with undef elements. But the the actual code was returning false if the build vector contained no undef elements....
This patch now ignores the number of undefs (getConstantSplatNode will return null if the build vector is all undefs).
The change has also unearthed a couple of missed opportunities in AVX512 comparison code that will need to be addressed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26031
llvm-svn: 286238
This patch avoids scalarization of CTLZ by instead expanding to use CTPOP (ref: "Hacker's Delight") when the necessary operations are available.
This also adds the necessary cost models for X86 SSE2 targets (the main beneficiary) to ensure vectorization only happens when its useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25910
llvm-svn: 286233
Summary:
Have MergeConsecutiveStores explicitly return information about the stores
that were merged, so that we can safely determine whether the starting
node has been freed.
Reviewers: chandlerc, bogner, niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25601
llvm-svn: 285916
2 new intrinsics covering AVX-512 compress/expand functionality.
This implementation includes syntax, DAG builder, operation lowering and tests.
Does not include: handling of illegal data types, codegen prepare pass and the cost model.
llvm-svn: 285876
This bug was exposed by using nsw/nuw for more aggressive folds in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284844
The changes mimic the IR demanded bits logic in InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedUseBits(),
but we can't just flip flag bits in the DAG; we have to create a new node that has the
bits cleared.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30841
llvm-svn: 285656
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
This looked like this had caused compile time regressions on some buildbots (and was reverted in rL285381), but appears to have just been a harmless bystander!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285494
Instead of asserting that the shift count is != 0 we just bail out
as it's not profitable trying to optimize a node which will be
removed anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26098
llvm-svn: 285480
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285296
This patch ensures that if a floating point vector operand is legalized by
expanding, it is legalized through the stack rather than by calling
DAGTypeLegalizer::IntegerToVector which will cause a failure since the operand
is a non-integer type.
This fixes PR 30715.
llvm-svn: 285231
Summary:
AMDGPU will need this one i16 is added as a legal type. This is tested by:
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sdiv.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sdivrem24.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/udiv.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/udivrem24.ll
Reviewers: bogner, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25699
llvm-svn: 285199
When there's a tie between partitionings of jump tables, consider also cases
that result in no jump tables, but in one or a few cases. The motivation is
that many contemporary processors typically perform case switches fairly
quickly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25212
llvm-svn: 285099
Summary:
Do *not* perform combines such as:
vector_shuffle<4,1,2,3>(build_vector(Ud, C0, C1 C2), scalar_to_vector(X))
->
build_vector(X, C0, C1, C2)
Keeping the shuffle allows lowering the constant build_vector to a materialized
constant vector (such as a vector-load from the constant-pool or some other idiom).
Reviewers: delena, igorb, spatel, mkuper, andreadb, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25524
llvm-svn: 285063
0 - X --> 0, if the sub is NUW
0 - X --> 0, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value and the sub is NSW
0 - X --> X, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value
This is the DAG equivalent of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284649
plus the fold for the NUW case which already existed in InstSimplify.
Note that we miss a vector fold because of a deficiency in the DAG version of
computeKnownBits().
llvm-svn: 284844
As discussed in D24815, let's start the process of killing off the broken fast-math global
state housed in TargetOptions and eliminate the need for function-level fast-math attributes.
Here we enable two similar folds that are possible when we don't care about signed-zero:
fadd nsz x, 0 --> x
fsub nsz 0, x --> -x
Note that although the test cases include a 'sin' function call, I'm side-stepping the
FMF-on-calls question (and lack of support in the DAG) for now. It's not needed for these
tests - isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression just look through a ISD::FSIN node.
Also, when we create an FNEG node and propagate the Flags of the FSUB to it, this doesn't
actually do anything today because Flags are silently dropped for any node that is not a
binary operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25297
llvm-svn: 284824
Summary:
While promoting *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG nodes whose inputs are already
promoted, perform the appropriate sign extension for the promoted node
before doing the *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG operation. If not, the undefined
high-order bits of the promoted operand may (a) be garbage inc ase of
zext) or (b) contribute the wrong sign-bit (in case of sext)
Updated the promote-vec3.ll test after this change. The diff shows
explicit zeroing in case of zext and intermediate sign extension in case
of sext.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25790
llvm-svn: 284752
