This patch adds a new InstModificationIRStrategy to mutate flags/options
for instructions. For example, it may add or remove nuw/nsw flags from
add, mul, sub, shl instructions or change the predicate for icmp
instructions.
Subtle changes such as those mentioned above should lead to a more
interesting range of inputs. The presence or absence of overflow flags
can expose subtle bugs, for example.
Reviewed By: bogner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94905
LoopUtils.h needs ICFLoopSafetyInfo but relies on a forward
declaration of ICFLoopSafetyInfo in IVDescriptors.h. This patch adds
a forward declaration right in LoopUtils.h.
While we are at it, this patch removes the one in IVDescriptors.h,
where it is unnecessary.
Some utilities used by InstCombine, like SimplifyLibCalls, may add new
instructions and replace the uses of a call, but return nullptr because
the inserted call produces multiple results.
Previously, the replaced library calls would get removed by
InstCombine's deleter, but after
292077072ec1279d89d21873fe900061e55ef936 this may not happen, if the
willreturn attribute is missing.
As a work-around, update replaceInstUsesWith to set MadeIRChange, if it
replaces any uses. This catches the cases where it is used as replacer
by utilities used by InstCombine and seems useful in general; updating
uses will modify the IR.
This fixes an expensive-check failure when replacing
@__sinpif/@__cospifi with @__sincospif_sret.
As shown in the test diffs, we could miscompile by
propagating flags that did not exist in the original
code.
The flags required for fmin/fmax reductions will be
fixed in a follow-up patch.
With the addition of the `willreturn` attribute, functions that may
not return (e.g. due to an infinite loop) are well defined, if they are
not marked as `willreturn`.
This patch updates `wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead` to not consider
calls that may not return as dead.
This patch still provides an escape hatch for intrinsics, which are
still assumed as willreturn unconditionally. It will be removed once
all intrinsics definitions have been reviewed and updated.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94106
If i change it to AssertingVH instead, a number of existing tests fail,
which means we don't consistently remove from the set when deleting blocks,
which means newly-created blocks may happen to appear in that set
if they happen to occupy the same memory chunk as did some block
that was in the set originally.
There are many places where we delete blocks,
and while we could probably consistently delete from LoopHeaders
when deleting a block in transforms located in SimplifyCFG.cpp itself,
transforms located elsewhere (Local.cpp/BasicBlockUtils.cpp) also may
delete blocks, and it doesn't seem good to teach them to deal with it.
Since we at most only ever delete from LoopHeaders,
let's just delegate to WeakVH to do that automatically.
But to be honest, personally, i'm not sure that the idea
behind LoopHeaders is sound.
The target features are obtained as a list of features/attributes.
Instead of storing them in a single string, store the vector. This
matches lto::Config's behavior and simplifies the transition to
lto::backend().
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95224
Insert a llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl intrinsic that identifies where a noalias argument was inlined.
This patch includes some refactorings from D90104.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93040
In RISC-V there is a single addressing mode of the form imm(reg) where
imm is a signed integer of 12-bit with a range of [-2048..2047] bytes
from reg.
The test MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout of the LLVM test-suite
exercises several scenarios with the stack, including function calls
where the stack will need to be realigned to to a local variable having
a large alignment of 4096 bytes.
In situations of large stacks, the RISC-V backend (in
RISCVFrameLowering) reserves an extra emergency spill slot which can be
used (if no free register is found) by the register scavenger after the
frame indexes have been eliminated. PrologEpilogInserter already takes
care of keeping the emergency spill slots as close as possible to the
stack pointer or frame pointer (depending on what the function will
use). However there is a final alignment step to honour the maximum
alignment of the stack that, when using the stack pointer to access the
emergency spill slots, has the side effect of setting them farther from
the stack pointer.
In the case of the frame_layout testcase, the net result is that we do
have an emergency spill slot but it is so far from the stack pointer
(more than 2048 bytes due to the extra alignment of a variable to 4096
bytes) that it becomes unreachable via any immediate offset.
During elimination of the frame index, many (regular) offsets of the
stack may be immediately unreachable already. Their address needs to be
computed using a register. A virtual register is created and later
RegisterScavenger should be able to find an unused (physical) register.
However if no register is available, RegisterScavenger will pick a
physical register and spill it onto an emergency stack slot, while we
compute the offset (restoring the chosen register after all this). This
assumes that the emergency stack slot is easily reachable (this is,
without requiring another register!).
This is the assumption we seem to break when we perform the extra
alignment in PrologEpilogInserter.
We can "float" the emergency spill slots by increasing (in absolute
value) their offsets from the incoming stack pointer. This way the
emergency spill slots will remain close to the stack pointer (once the
function has allocated storage for the stack, including the needed
realignment). The new size computed in PrologEpilogInserter is padding
so it should be OK to move the emergency spill slots there. Also because
we're increasing the alignment, the new location should stay aligned for
the purpose of the emergency spill slots.
Note that this change also impacts other backends as shown by the tests.
Changes are minor adjustments to the emergency stack slot offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89239
This patch fixes llvm-link assertion when linking external variable
declaration with a definition with appending linkage.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95126
The test wasn't sensitive to alias analysis. As you can seen from D95117 when AA is added by default this is affected.
Updating the test so that it coveres both cases for AA analysis.
Note that this patch depends on D95117 to land first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95247
This builds on the restricted after initial revert form of D93906, and adds back support for breaking backedges of inner loops. It turns out the original invalidation logic wasn't quite right, specifically around the handling of LCSSA.
When breaking the backedge of an inner loop, we can cause blocks which were in the outer loop only because they were also included in a sub-loop to be removed from both loops. This results in the exit block set for our original parent loop changing, and thus a need for new LCSSA phi nodes.
This case happens when the inner loop has an exit block which is also an exit block of the parent, and there's a block in the child which reaches an exit to said block without also reaching an exit to the parent loop.
(I'm describing this in terms of the immediate parent, but the problem is general for any transitive parent in the nest.)
The approach implemented here involves a potentially expensive LCSSA rebuild. Perf testing during review didn't show anything concerning, but we may end up needing to revert this if anyone encounters a practical compile time issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94378
Rather than reimplement, use a `using` declaration to bring in
`SmallVectorImpl<char>`'s assign and append implementations in
`SmallString`.
The `SmallString` versions were missing reference invalidation
assertions from `SmallVector`. This patch also fixes a bug in
`llvm::FileCollector::addFileImpl`, which was a copy/paste from
`clang::ModuleDependencyCollector::copyToRoot`, both caught by the
no-longer-skipped assertions.
As a drive-by, this also sinks the `const SmallVectorImpl&` versions of
these methods down into `SmallVectorImpl`, since I imagine they'd be
useful elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95202
The only caller of this function is in the LocalStackSlotAllocation
and it creates base register of class returned by the target's
getPointerRegClass(). AMDGPU wants to use a different reg class
here so let materializeFrameBaseRegister to just create and return
whatever it wants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95268
Similar to our free standing setcc patterns, we can use ADDI to
subtract the immediate from the other operand. Then the cmov
can check if the result is zero or non-zero.
Reviewed By: mundaym
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95169
Similar to binary operators like fadd/fmul/fsub, propagate shape info
through unary operators (fneg is the only one?).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95252
I have previously tried doing that in
b33fbbaa34f0fe9fb16789afc72ae424c1825b69 / d38205144febf4dc42c9270c6aa3d978f1ef65e1,
but eventually it was pointed out that the approach taken there
was just broken wrt how the uses of bonus instructions are updated
to account for the fact that they should now use either bonus instruction
or the cloned bonus instruction. In particluar, all that manual handling
of PHI nodes in successors was just wrong.
But, the fix is actually much much simpler than my initial approach:
just tell SSAUpdate about both instances of bonus instruction,
and let it deal with all the PHI handling.
Alive2 confirms that the reproducers from the original bugs (@pr48450*)
are now handled correctly.
This effectively reverts commit 59560e85897afc50090b6c3d920bacfd28b49d06,
effectively relanding b33fbbaa34f0fe9fb16789afc72ae424c1825b69.
