to the instruction position. The old encoding would give an absolute
ID which counts up within a function, and only resets at the next function.
I.e., Instead of having:
... = icmp eq i32 n-1, n-2
br i1 ..., label %bb1, label %bb2
it will now be roughly:
... = icmp eq i32 1, 2
br i1 1, label %bb1, label %bb2
This makes it so that ids remain relatively small and can be encoded
in fewer bits.
With this encoding, forward reference operands will be given
negative-valued IDs. Use signed VBRs for the most common case
of forward references, which is phi instructions.
To retain backward compatibility we bump the bitcode version
from 0 to 1 to distinguish between the different encodings.
llvm-svn: 165739
Not all instructions define a virtual register in their first operand.
Specifically, INLINEASM has a different format.
<rdar://problem/12472811>
llvm-svn: 165721
For function calls on the 64-bit PowerPC SVR4 target, each parameter
is mapped to as many doublewords in the parameter save area as
necessary to hold the parameter. The first 13 non-varargs
floating-point values are passed in registers; any additional
floating-point parameters are passed in the parameter save area. A
single-precision floating-point parameter (32 bits) must be mapped to
the second (rightmost, low-order) word of its assigned doubleword
slot.
Currently LLVM violates this ABI requirement by mapping such a
parameter to the first (leftmost, high-order) word of its assigned
doubleword slot. This is internally self-consistent but will not
interoperate correctly with libraries compiled with an ABI-compliant
compiler.
This patch corrects the problem by adjusting the parameter addressing
on both sides of the calling convention.
llvm-svn: 165714
Note: [D]M{T,F}CP2 is just a recommended encoding. Vendors often provide a
custom CP2 that interprets instructions differently and may wish to add their
own instructions that use this opcode. We should ensure that this is easy to
do. I will probably add a 'has custom CP{0-3}' subtarget flag to make this
easy: We want to avoid the GCC situation where every MIPS vendor makes a custom
fork that breaks every other MIPS CPU and so can't be merged upstream.
llvm-svn: 165711
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
value but later turns out to be a function.
Unfortunately, we can't fold tests into a single file because we only get one
error out of llvm-as.
llvm-svn: 165680
Original message:
The attached is the fix to radar://11663049. The optimization can be outlined by following rules:
(select (x != c), e, c) -> select (x != c), e, x),
(select (x == c), c, e) -> select (x == c), x, e)
where the <c> is an integer constant.
The reason for this change is that : on x86, conditional-move-from-constant needs two instructions;
however, conditional-move-from-register need only one instruction.
While the LowerSELECT() sounds to be the most convenient place for this optimization, it turns out to be a bad place. The reason is that by replacing the constant <c> with a symbolic value, it obscure some instruction-combining opportunities which would otherwise be very easy to spot. For that reason, I have to postpone the change to last instruction-combining phase.
The change passes the test of "make check-all -C <build-root/test" and "make -C project/test-suite/SingleSource".
llvm-svn: 165661
the compiler makes use of GPR0. However, there are two flavors of
GPR0 defined by the target: the 32-bit GPR0 (R0) and the 64-bit GPR0
(X0). The spill/reload code makes use of R0 regardless of whether we
are generating 32- or 64-bit code.
This patch corrects the problem in the obvious manner, using X0 and
ADDI8 for 64-bit and R0 and ADDI for 32-bit.
llvm-svn: 165658
the Altivec extensions were introduced. Its use is optional, and
allows the compiler to communicate to the operating system which
vector registers should be saved and restored during a context switch.
In practice, this information is ignored by the various operating
systems using the SVR4 ABI; the kernel saves and restores the entire
register state. Setting the VRSAVE register is no longer performed by
the AIX XL compilers, the IBM i compilers, or by GCC on Power Linux
systems. It seems best to avoid this logic within LLVM as well.
This patch avoids generating code to update and restore VRSAVE for the
PowerPC SVR4 ABIs (32- and 64-bit). The code remains in place for the
Darwin ABI.
llvm-svn: 165656
The minimum set of required instructions is ISD::AND, ISD::OR, ISD::SETO(or ISD::SETOEQ) and ISD::SETUO(or ISD::SETUNE). Everything is expanded into one of two patterns:
Pattern 1: (LHS CC1 RHS) Opc (LHS CC2 RHS)
Pattern 2: (LHS CC1 LHS) Opc (RHS CC2 RHS)
llvm-svn: 165655
Some of these dyn_cast<>'s would be better phrased as isa<> or cast<>.
That will happen in a future patch.
There are also two dyn_cast_or_null<>'s slipped in instead of
dyn_cast<>'s, since they were causing crashes with just dyn_cast<>.
llvm-svn: 165646
Hypothesis 1: use of `.. code::` directive instead of `.. code-block::`
is causing Sphinx to discard the block. On my machine, `.. code::`
renders fine. However, I don't think that `.. code::` is actually a
legit Sphinx directive. I believe that on my machine Sphinx is falling
back to just displaying it monospace with no syntax, whereas llvm.org's
Sphinx is just discarding it.
This is truly "remote debugging" since I can't reproduce this on my
machine. It would be helpful to be able to see the llvm.org Sphinx
build logs; if that's possible please let me know.
llvm-svn: 165632
- Due to the current matching vector elements constraints in
ISD::FP_ROUND, rounding from v2f64 to v4f32 (after legalization from
v2f32) is scalarized. Add a customized v2f32 widening to convert it
into a target-specific X86ISD::VFPROUND to work around this
constraints.
llvm-svn: 165631
- Due to the current matching vector elements constraints in ISD::FP_EXTEND,
rounding from v2f32 to v2f64 is scalarized. Add a customized v2f32 widening
to convert it into a target-specific X86ISD::VFPEXT to work around this
constraints. This patch also reverts a previous attempt to fix this issue by
recovering the scalarized ISD::FP_EXTEND pattern and thus significantly
reduces the overhead of supporting non-power-2 vector FP extend.
llvm-svn: 165625
