Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
uses of TM->getSubtargetImpl and propagate to all calls.
This could be a debugging regression in places where we had a
TargetMachine and/or MachineFunction but don't have it as part
of the MachineInstr. Fixing this would require passing a
MachineFunction/Function down through the print operator, but
none of the existing uses in tree seem to do this.
llvm-svn: 230710
a lookup, pass that in rather than use a naked call to getSubtargetImpl.
This involved passing down and around either a TargetMachine or
TargetRegisterInfo. Update all callers/definitions around the targets
and SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 230699
This required plumbing a TargetRegisterInfo through computeRegisterProperties
and into findRepresentativeClass which uses it for register class
iteration. This required passing a subtarget into a few target specific
initializations of TargetLowering.
llvm-svn: 230583
The reason why these large shift sizes happen is because OpaqueConstants
currently inhibit alot of DAG combining, but that has to be addressed in
another commit (like the proposal in D6946).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6940
llvm-svn: 230355
It was previously using the subtarget to get values for the global
offset without actually checking each function as it was generating
code. Go ahead and solidify the current behavior and make the
existing FIXMEs more prominent.
As a note the ARM backend previously had a thumb1 and non-thumb1
set of defaults. Only the former was tested so I've changed the
behavior to only use that for now.
llvm-svn: 230245
This patch adds the isProfitableToHoist API. For AArch64, we want to prevent a
fmul from being hoisted in cases where it is more profitable to form a
fmsub/fmadd.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7299
Patch by Lawrence Hu <lawrence@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 230241
Everyone except R600 was manually passing the length of a static array
at each callsite, calculated in a variety of interesting ways. Far
easier to let ArrayRef handle that.
There should be no functional change, but out of tree targets may have
to tweak their calls as with these examples.
llvm-svn: 230118
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
This adds a safe interface to the machine independent InputArg struct
for accessing the index of the original (IR-level) argument. When a
non-native return type is lowered, we generate the hidden
machine-level sret argument on-the-fly. Before this fix, we were
representing this argument as OrigArgIndex == 0, which is an outright
lie. In particular this crashed in the AArch64 backend where we
actually try to access the type of the original argument.
Now we use a sentinel value for machine arguments that have no
original argument index. AArch64, ARM, Mips, and PPC now check for this
case before accessing the original argument.
Fixes <rdar://19792160> Null pointer assertion in AArch64TargetLowering
llvm-svn: 229413
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
llvm-svn: 229218
LLVM's include tree and the use of using declarations to hide the
'legacy' namespace for the old pass manager.
This undoes the primary modules-hostile change I made to keep
out-of-tree targets building. I sent an email inquiring about whether
this would be reasonable to do at this phase and people seemed fine with
it, so making it a reality. This should allow us to start bootstrapping
with modules to a certain extent along with making it easier to mix and
match headers in general.
The updates to any code for users of LLVM are very mechanical. Switch
from including "llvm/PassManager.h" to "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h".
Qualify the types which now produce compile errors with "legacy::". The
most common ones are "PassManager", "PassManagerBase", and
"FunctionPassManager".
llvm-svn: 229094
The NodeMetadata are maintained in an incremental way. When an edge between
2 nodes has its cost updated, in the course of graph reduction for example,
the NodeMetadata need first to have the old edge cost removed, then the new
edge cost added. Only once the NodeMetadata have been fully updated, it
becomes safe to consider promoting the nodes to the
ConservativelyAllocatable or OptimallyReducible sets. Previously, this
promotion was occuring right after the removing the old cost, and this was
breaking the assumption that a ConservativelyAllocatable should not be
spilled.
This patch also adds asserts to:
- enforces the invariant that a node's reduction can not be downgraded,
- only not provably allocatable or optimally reducible nodes can be spilled.
llvm-svn: 228816
While various DAG combines try to guarantee that a vector SETCC
operation will have the same output size as input, there's nothing
intrinsic to either creation or LegalizeTypes that actually guarantees
it, so the function needs to be ready to handle a mismatch.
Fortunately this is easy enough, just extend or truncate the naturally
compared result.
I couldn't reproduce the failure in other backends that I know have
SIMD, so it's probably only an issue for these two due to shared
heritage.
Should fix PR21645.
llvm-svn: 228518
from a conditional branch fed by an add/sub/mul-with-overflow node.
We previously used the SDLoc of the overflow node, for no good reason.
In some cases, this led to the Bcc and B terminators having different
source orders, and DBG_VALUEs being inserted between them.
The real issue is with the code that can't handle DBG_VALUEs between
terminators: the few places affected by this will be fixed soon.
In the meantime, fixing the SDLoc is a positive change no matter what.
No tests, as I have no idea how to get .loc emitted for branches?
rdar://19347133
llvm-svn: 228463
Currently, Cortex-A72 is modelled as an Cortex-A57 except the fp
load balancing pass isn't enabled for Cortex-A72 as it's not
profitable to have it enabled for this core.
Patch by Ranjeet Singh.
llvm-svn: 228140
The ARM assembler allows register alias redefinitions as long as it
targets the same register. r222319 broke that. In the AArch64 case
it would just produce a new warning, but in the ARM case it would
error out on previously accepted assembler.
llvm-svn: 228109
This avoids a partial false dependency on the previous content of
the upper lanes of the destination vector register.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7307
llvm-svn: 227820
now that we have a correct and cached subtarget specific to the
function.
Also, finish providing a cached per-function subtarget in the core
LLVMTargetMachine -- that layer hadn't switched over yet.
The only use of the TargetMachine was to re-lookup a subtarget for
a particular function to work around the fact that TTI was immutable.
Now that it is per-function and we haved a cached subtarget, use it.
This still leaves a few interfaces with real warts on them where we were
passing Function objects through the TTI interface. I'll remove these
and clean their usage up in subsequent commits now that this isn't
necessary.
llvm-svn: 227738
intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the
derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering.
Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need
to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer.
This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via
a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will
pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences
into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up
the correct subtarget.
llvm-svn: 227737
TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI.
This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for
each target to just register a precise callback that creates their
specific TTI.
As part of this, all of the targets which are building their subtargets
individually per-function now build their TTI instance with the function
and thus look up the correct subtarget and cache it. NVPTX, R600, and
XCore currently don't leverage this functionality, but its trivial for
them to add it now.
llvm-svn: 227735
null.
For some reason some of the original TTI code supported a null target
machine. This seems to have been legacy, and I made matters worse when
refactoring this code by spreading that pattern further through the
various targets.
The TargetMachine can't actually be null, and it doesn't make sense to
support that use case. I've now consistently removed it and removed all
of the code trying to cope with that situation. This is probably good,
as several targets *didn't* cope with it being null despite the null
default argument in their constructors. =]
llvm-svn: 227734
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
llvm-svn: 227669
Add tie breaker to colorChainSet() sort so that processing order doesn't
depend on std::set order, which depends on pointer order, which is
unstable from run to run.
No test case as this is nearly impossible to reproduce.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7265
Patch by Geoff Berry <gberry@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 227606
These are needed so this pass will produce output when
e.g. -print-after-all is used.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7264
Patch by Geoff Berry <gberry@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 227506
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
-no-exec-stack. This was due to it not deriving from the correct
asm info base class and missing the override for the exec
stack section query. Added another line to the noexec test
line to make sure this doesn't regress.
llvm-svn: 227074
This patch adds the missing LD[U]RSW variants to the load store optimizer, so
that we generate LDPSW when possible.
<rdar://problem/19583480>
llvm-svn: 226978
Currently, we're adding a uint64_t describing the current subtarget so
that matching can check whether the specified register is valid.
However, we want to move to a bitset for those bits (x86 has more than
64 of them).
This can't live in a union so it's probably better to do the checks
early (especially as there are only 3 of them).
llvm-svn: 226841
AAPCS64 says that it's up to the platform to specify whether x18 is
reserved, and a first step on that way is to add a flag controlling
it.
From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>
llvm-svn: 226664
The fixes are to note that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. In particular, ld64 requires that relocations to
cstring/cfstrings use linker visible symbols.
Original message:
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 226503
Original patch by Luke Iannini. Minor improvements and test added by
Erik de Castro Lopo.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6877
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@mega-nerd.com>
llvm-svn: 226473
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can
be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L
symbol in the symbol table or not.
The other is that ld64 requires the relocations to cstring to use linker
visible symbols on AArch64.
Thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for testing this!
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225644
type (in addition to the memory type).
The *LoadExt* legalization handling used to only have one type, the
memory type. This forced users to assume that as long as the extload
for the memory type was declared legal, and the result type was legal,
the whole extload was legal.
However, this isn't always the case. For instance, on X86, with AVX,
this is legal:
v4i32 load, zext from v4i8
but this isn't:
v4i64 load, zext from v4i8
Whereas v4i64 is (arguably) legal, even without AVX2.
Note that the same thing was done a while ago for truncstores (r46140),
but I assume no one needed it yet for extloads, so here we go.
Calls to getLoadExtAction were changed to add the value type, found
manually in the surrounding code.
Calls to setLoadExtAction were mechanically changed, by wrapping the
call in a loop, to match previous behavior. The loop iterates over
the MVT subrange corresponding to the memory type (FP vectors, etc...).
I also pulled neighboring setTruncStoreActions into some of the loops;
those shouldn't make a difference, as the additional types are illegal.
(e.g., i128->i1 truncstores on PPC.)
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6532
llvm-svn: 225421
Even thouh gcc produces simialr instructions as Owen pointed out the two patterns aren’t equivalent in the case
where the original subtraction could have caused an overflow.
Reverting the same.
llvm-svn: 225341
We used to generate code similar to:
umov.b w8, v0[2]
strb w8, [x0, x1]
because the STR*ro* patterns were preferred to ST1*.
Instead, we can avoid going through GPRs, and generate:
add x8, x0, x1
st1.b { v0 }[2], [x8]
This patch increases the ST1* AddedComplexity to achieve that.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6202
llvm-svn: 225183
For 0-lane stores, we used to generate code similar to:
fmov w8, s0
str w8, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
instead of:
str s0, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
To correct that: for store lane 0 patterns, directly match to STR <subreg>0.
Byte-sized instructions don't have the special case for a 0 index,
because FPR8s are defined to have untyped content.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6772
llvm-svn: 225181
This patch lowers patterns such as-
sub v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
abs v0.4s, v0.4s
to
sabd v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
on AArch64.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6781
llvm-svn: 225165
Weak externals are resolved statically, so we can actually generate the tail
call on PE/COFF targets without breaking the requirements. It is questionable
whether we want to propagate the current behaviour for MachO as the requirements
are part of the ARM ELF specifications, and it seems that prior to the SVN
r215890, we would have tail'ed the call. For now, be conservative and only
permit it on PE/COFF where the call will always be fully resolved.
llvm-svn: 225119
Make sure they all have llvm_unreachable on the default path out of the switch. Remove unnecessary "default: break". Remove a 'return' after unreachable. Fix some indentation.
llvm-svn: 225114
The issues was that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when
deciding to put a L symbol in the symbol table or not.
Original message:
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225048
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 224985
Debug info marks the first instruction without the FrameSetup flag
as being the end of the function prologue. Any CFI instructions in the
middle of the function prologue would cause debug info to end the prologue
too early and worse, attach the line number of the CFI instruction, which
incidentally is often 0.
llvm-svn: 224294
Add in definedness checks for shift operators, null checks when
pointers are assumed by the code to be non-null, and explicit
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 224255
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
This is the 2nd attempt at this after realizing that PassManager::add() may
actually delete the pass.
llvm-svn: 224059
Previously print+verify passes were added in a very unsystematic way, which is
annoying when debugging as you miss intermediate steps and allows bugs to stay
unnotice when no verification is performed.
To make this change practical I added the possibility to explicitely disable
verification. I used this option on all places where no verification was
performed previously (because alot of places actually don't pass the
MachineVerifier).
In the long term these problems should be fixed properly and verification
enabled after each pass. I'll enable some more verification in subsequent
commits.
llvm-svn: 224042
In the large code model we have to first get the address of the GOT entry, load
the address of the constant, and then load the constant itself.
To avoid these loads and the GOT entry alltogether this commit changes the way
how FP constants are materialized in the large code model. The constats are now
materialized in a GPR and then bitconverted/moved into the FPR.
Reviewed by Tim Northover
Fixes rdar://problem/16572564.
llvm-svn: 223941
The load/store value type is currently not available when lowering the memcpy
intrinsic. Add the missing nullptr check to support this in 'computeAddress'.
Fixes rdar://problem/19178947.
llvm-svn: 223818
DenseSet used to be implemented as DenseMap<Key, char>, which usually doubled
the memory footprint of the map. Now we use a compressed set so the second
element uses no memory at all. This required some surgery on DenseMap as
all accesses to the bucket now have to go through methods; this should
have no impact on the behavior of DenseMap though. The new default bucket
type for DenseMap is a slightly extended std::pair as we expose it through
DenseMap's iterator and don't want to break any existing users.
llvm-svn: 223588
Use the MCAsmInfo instead of the DataLayout, and allow
specifying a custom prefix for labels specifically. HSAIL
requires that labels begin with @, but global symbols with &.
llvm-svn: 223323
A global variable without an explicit alignment specified should be assumed to
be ABI-aligned according to its type, like on other platforms. This allows us
to use better memory operations when accessing it.
rdar://18533701
llvm-svn: 223180
This frequently leads to cases like:
ldr xD, [xN, :lo12:var]
add xA, xN, :lo12:var
ldr xD, [xA, #8]
where the ADD would have been needed anyway, and the two distinct addressing
modes can prevent the formation of an ldp. Because of how we handle ADRP
(aggressively forming an ADRP/ADD pseudo-inst at ISel time), this pattern also
results in duplicated ADRP instructions (one on its own to cover the ldr, and
one combined with the add).
llvm-svn: 223172
Reduce the number of nops emitted for stackmap shadows on AArch64 by counting
non-stackmap instructions up to the next branch target towards the requested
shadow.
<rdar://problem/14959522>
llvm-svn: 223156
The blocking code originated in ARM, which is more aggressive about casting
types to a canonical representative before doing anything else, so I missed out
most vector HFAs and broke the ABI. This should fix it.
llvm-svn: 223126
r208210 introduced an optimization that improves the vector select
codegen by doing the setcc on vectors directly.
This is a problem they the setcc operands are i1s, because the
optimization would create vectors of i1, which aren't legal.
Part of PR21549.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6308
llvm-svn: 223075
r213378 improved f16 bitcasts, so that they go directly through subregs,
instead of through the stack. That code now causes an assertion failure
for bitcasts from other 16-bits types (most importantly v2i8).
Correct that by doing the custom lowering for i16 bitcasts only when the
input is an f16.
Part of PR21549.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6307
llvm-svn: 223074
The AAPCS treats small structs and homogeneous floating (or vector) aggregates
specially, and guarantees they either get passed as a contiguous block of
registers, or prevent any future use of those registers and get passed on the
stack.
This concept can fit quite neatly into LLVM's own type system, mapping an HFA
to [N x float] and so on, and small structs to [N x i64]. Doing so allows
front-ends to emit AAPCS compliant code without having to duplicate the
register counting logic.
llvm-svn: 222903
This mostly entails adding relocations, however there are a couple of
changes to existing relocations:
1. R_AARCH64_NONE is defined to be zero rather than 256
R_AARCH64_NONE has been defined to be zero for a long time elsewhere
e.g. binutils and glibc since the submission of the AArch64 port in
2012 so this is required for compatibility.
2. R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_ADR_PAGE renamed to R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_ADR_PAGE21
I don't think there is any way for relocation names to leak out of LLVM
so this should not break anything.
Tested with check-all with no regressions.
llvm-svn: 222821
The pattern matching failed to recognize all instances of "-1", because when
comparing against "-1" we didn't use an APInt of the same bitwidth.
This commit fixes this and also adds inverse versions of the conditon to catch
more cases.
llvm-svn: 222722
E.g., ( a / D; b / D ) -> ( recip = 1.0 / D; a * recip; b * recip)
A hook is added to allow the target to control whether it needs to do such combine.
Reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D6334
llvm-svn: 222510
These recently all grew a unique_ptr<TargetLoweringObjectFile> member in
r221878. When anyone calls a virtual method of a class, clang-cl
requires all virtual methods to be semantically valid. This includes the
implicit virtual destructor, which triggers instantiation of the
unique_ptr destructor, which fails because the type being deleted is
incomplete.
This is just part of the ongoing saga of PR20337, which is affecting
Blink as well. Because the MSVC ABI doesn't have key functions, we end
up referencing the vtable and implicit destructor on any virtual call
through a class. We don't actually end up emitting the dtor, so it'd be
good if we could avoid this unneeded type completion work.
llvm-svn: 222480
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
Using AA during CodeGen is very useful for in-order cores. It is less useful for ooo cores. Also I find
enabling useAA for Cortex-A57 may generate worse code for some test cases. If useAA in codegen is improved
and benefical for ooo cores, we can enable it again.
llvm-svn: 222333
SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP can gives more optimizaiton opportunities related to GEPs, which benefits EarlyCSE
and LICM. By enabling these passes we can have better address calculations and generate a better addressing
mode. Some SPEC 2006 benchmarks (astar, gobmk, namd) have obvious improvements on Cortex-A57.
Reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5864.
llvm-svn: 222331
Having two ways to do this doesn't seem terribly helpful and
consistently using the insert version (which we already has) seems like
it'll make the code easier to understand to anyone working with standard
data structures. (I also updated many references to the Entry's
key and value to use first() and second instead of getKey{Data,Length,}
and get/setValue - for similar consistency)
Also removes the GetOrCreateValue functions so there's less surface area
to StringMap to fix/improve/change/accommodate move semantics, etc.
llvm-svn: 222319
shift-right for booleans (i1).
Arithmetic shift-right immediate with sign-/zero-extensions also works for
boolean values. Update the assert and the test cases to reflect that fact.
llvm-svn: 222272
shift-right for booleans (i1).
Logical shift-right immediate with sign-/zero-extensions also works for boolean
values. Update the assert and the test cases to reflect that fact.
llvm-svn: 222270
Shifts also perform sign-/zero-extends to larger types, which requires us to emit
an integer extend instead of a simple COPY.
Related to PR21594.
llvm-svn: 222257
"optimizeCompareInstr" converts compares (cmp/cmn) into plain sub/add
instructions when the flags are not used anymore. This conversion is valid for
most instructions, but not all. Some instructions that don't set the flags
(e.g. sub with immediate) can set the SP, whereas the flag setting version uses
the same encoding for the "zero" register.
Update the code to also check for the return register before performing the
optimization to make sure that a cmp doesn't suddenly turn into a sub that sets
the stack pointer.
I don't have a test case for this, because it isn't easy to trigger.
llvm-svn: 222255
This change emits a COPY for a shift-immediate with a "zero" shift value.
This fixes PR21594 where we emitted a shift instruction with an incorrect
immediate operand.
llvm-svn: 222247
The generic FastISel code would bail, because it can't emit a sign-extend for
AArch64. This copies the code over and uses AArch64 specific emit functions.
This is not ideal and 'computeAddress' should handles this, so it can fold the
address computation into the memory operation.
I plan to clean up 'computeAddress' anyways, so I will add that in a future
commit.
Related to rdar://problem/18962471.
llvm-svn: 221923
This folds the compare emission into the select emission when possible, so we
can directly use the flags and don't have to emit a separate compare.
Related to rdar://problem/18960150.
llvm-svn: 221847
With this patch MCDisassembler::getInstruction takes an ArrayRef<uint8_t>
instead of a MemoryObject.
Even on X86 there is a maximum size an instruction can have. Given
that, it seems way simpler and more efficient to just pass an ArrayRef
to the disassembler instead of a MemoryObject and have it do a virtual
call every time it wants some extra bytes.
llvm-svn: 221751
In the case we optimize an integer extend away and replace it directly with the
source register, we also have to clear all kill flags at all its uses.
This is necessary, because the orignal IR instruction might be trivially dead,
but we replaced it with a nop at MI level.
llvm-svn: 221628
This fixes a few cases of:
* Wrong variable name style.
* Lines longer than 80 columns.
* Repeated names in comments.
* clang-format of the above.
This make the next patch a lot easier to read.
llvm-svn: 221615
Reversing a CB* instruction used to drop the flags on the condition. On the
included testcase, this lead to a read from an undefined vreg.
Using addOperand keeps the flags, here <undef>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6159
llvm-svn: 221507
While fixing up the register classes in the machine combiner in a previous
commit I missed one.
This fixes the last one and adds a test case.
llvm-svn: 221308
Some literals in the AArch64 backend had 15 'f's rather than 16, causing
comparisons with a constant 0xffffffffffffffff to be miscompiled.
llvm-svn: 221157
This removes calls to isMaterializable in the following cases:
* It was redundant with a call to isDeclaration now that isDeclaration returns
the correct answer for materializable functions.
* It was followed by a call to Materialize. Just call Materialize and check EC.
llvm-svn: 221050
Our internal test reveals such case should not be transformed:
cmp x17, #3
b.lt .LBB10_15
...
subs x12, x12, #1
b.gt .LBB10_1
where x12 is a liveout, becomes:
cmp x17, #2
b.le .LBB10_15
...
subs x12, x12, #2
b.ge .LBB10_1
Unable to provide test case as it's difficult to reproduce on community branch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6048
Patch by Zhaoshi Zheng <zhaoshiz@codeaurora.org>!
llvm-svn: 220987
Benchmarks have shown that it's harmless to the performance there, and having a
unified set of passes between the two cores where possible helps big.LITTLE
deployment.
Patch by Z. Zheng.
llvm-svn: 220744
This is a minor change to use the immediate version when the operand is a null
value. This should get rid of an unnecessary 'mov' instruction in debug
builds and align the code more with the one generated by SelectionDAG.
This fixes rdar://problem/18785125.
llvm-svn: 220713
