PassInfoMixin should be used for all NPM passes, rater than a custom
`name()`.
This caused ambiguous references in LegacyPassManager.cpp, so had to
remove "using namespace llvm::legacy" and move some things around.
The passes had to be moved to the llvm namespace, or else they would get
printed as "(anonymous namespace)::FooPass".
Reviewed By: ychen, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83498
Change file static function getEntryForPercentile to be a static member function
in ProfileSummaryBuilder so it can be used by other files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83439
This is currently bare-bones; we aren't taking advantage of any of the
FMA variant instructions. But it's enough to at least generate
code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83444
This patch adds the instruction definitions and the assembly/disassembly
tests for the Load/Store VSX Vector Rightmose instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83364
Document the default of `fail` in `-help`. Extend `-dump-input=help`
to help users find related command-line options, but let `-help`
provide their full documentation.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83091
This time without the change to make operator| use operator&=.
That seems to be the source of the gcc 5.3 miscompile.
Original commit message:
These represent the same thing but 64BIT only showed up from
getHostCPUFeatures providing a list of featuers to clang. While
EM64T showed up from getting the features for a named CPU.
EM64T didn't have a string specifically so it would not be passed
up to clang when getting features for a named CPU. While 64bit
needed a name since that's how it is index.
Merge them by filtering 64bit out before sending features to clang
for named CPUs.
This is practically NFC at the moment because nothing really
asks the real number or does anything useful with it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82202
This likely has broken test/Transforms/Attributor/IPConstantProp/ tests.
http://45.33.8.238/linux/22502/step_12.txt
This reverts commit 205dc0922d5f7305226f7457fcbcb4224c92530c.
Summary:
Ignore callback uses when adding a callback function
in the CallGraph. Callback functions are typically
created when outlining, e.g. for OpenMP, so they have
internal scope and linkage. They should not be added
to the ExternalCallingNode since they are only callable
by the specified caller function at creation time.
A CGSCC pass, such as OpenMPOpt, may need to update
the CallGraph by adding a new outlined callback function.
Without ignoring callback uses, adding breaks CGSCC
pass restrictions and results to a broken CallGraph.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83370
Summary:
This handles all three places where attributes could currently be - `GlobalVariable`, `Function` and `CallBase`.
For last two, it correctly handles all three possible attribute locations (return value, arguments and function itself)
There was a previous attempt at it D73853,
which was committed in rGfc62b36a000681c01e993242b583c5ec4ab48a3c,
but then reverted all the way back in rGb12176d2aafa0ccb2585aa218fc3b454ba84f2a9
due to some (osx?) test failures.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, dblaikie, diegotf, george.burgess.iv, jdoerfert, Tyker, arsenm
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: wdng, MaskRay, arsenm, llvm-commits, mgorny
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83351
Summary:
As per disscussion in D83351, using `for_each` is potentially confusing,
at least in regards to inconsistent style (there's less than 100 `for_each`
usages in LLVM, but ~100.000 `for` range-based loops
Therefore, it should be avoided.
Reviewers: dblaikie, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: dblaikie, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: hubert.reinterpretcast, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83431
And just after 3 days, we have a hit in `InstCombiner::mergeStoreIntoSuccessor()`:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46661
To be recommitted once that is addressed.
This reverts commit cd7f8051ac7b6f08734102446482c1e5d951bfcc.
Follow up from the transform being removed in D83360. If X is probably not poison, then the transform is safe.
Still plan to remove or adjust the code from ConstantFolding after this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83440
The following: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82552
fixed an assert in the SelectionDag ISel legalizer for some CCs on armv7.
I noticed that this fix also fixes the assert when using fastcc, so I am
adding a fastcc regression test here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82443
We can't fold to the non-undef value unless we know it isn't poison. So check each element with isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison. This currently rules out all constant expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83442
If we don't immediately lower the vector shift, the splat
constant vector we created may get turned into a constant pool
load before we get around to lowering the shift. This makes it
a lot more difficult to create a shift by constant. Sometimes we
fail to see through the constant pool at all and end up trying
to lower as if it was a variable shift. This requires custom
handling and may create an unsupported vselect on pre-sse-4.1
targets. Since we're after LegalizeVectorOps we are unable to
legalize the unsupported vselect as that code is in LegalizeVectorOps
rather than LegalizeDAG.
So calling LowerShift immediately ensures that we get see the
splat constant.
Fixes PR46527.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83455
Technically a VSELECT expects a vector of all 1s or 0s elements
for its condition. But we aren't guaranteeing that the sign bit
and the non sign bits match in these locations. So we should use
BLENDV which is more relaxed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83447
The code currently checks whether the intersection has one of TBAA,
Scope or NoAlias unset -- however, those might have already been
unset in the first place, in which case we will unnecessarily
report a change. Instead, compare the intersection result to the
original AAInfo.
This makes for a 0.5% geomean compile-time saving on CTMark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83430
Currently the instruction paddi always takes s34imm as the type for the
34 bit immediate. However, the PC Relative form of the instruction should
not produce the same fixup as the non PC Relative form.
This patch splits the s34imm type into s34imm and s34imm_pcrel so that two
different fixups can be emitted.
Reviewed By: kamaub, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83255
Some of the tests in the llvm/test/Transforms/IPConstantProp directory
actually only use -ipsccp. Those tests belong to the other (IP)SCCP
tests in llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/ and this commits moves them there to
avoid confusion with IPConstantProp.
It gets miscompiled with GCC 5.3, causing Clang to crash with
"error: unknown target CPU 'x86-64'"
See the llvm-commits thread for reproduction steps.
This reverts commit 51b0da731af75c68dd521e04cc576d5a611b1612.
The unfortunate split between finalizeLowering and the selector pass
means there's a point where the verifier fails. The DAG selector pass
skips the verifier, but this seems to not work when using the
GlobalISel fallback.
This option was added a while back, to help improve AA around pointer
phi loops. It looks for phi(gep(phi, const), x) loops, checking if x can
then prove more precise aliasing info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82998
Since none of these users really care about the actual type, hide the
type under a new size-getting attribute to go along with
hasPassPointeeByValueAttr. This will work better for the future byref
attribute, which may end up only tracking the byte size and not the IR
type.
We currently have 3 parameter attributes that should carry the type
(technically inalloca does not yet). The APIs are somewhat awkward
since preallocated/inalloca piggyback on byval in some places, but in
others are treated as distinct attributes. Since these are all
mutually exclusive, we should probably just merge all the attribute
infrastructure treating these as totally distinct attributes.
If we're extracting a subvector from a shuffle that is shuffling entire subvectors we can peek through and extract the subvector from the shuffle source instead.
This helps remove some cases where concat_vectors(extract_subvector(),extract_subvector()) legalizations has resulted in BLEND/VPERM2F128 shuffles of the subvectors.
Since the `RISCVExpandPseudo` pass has been split from
`RISCVExpandAtomicPseudo` pass, it would be nice to run the former as
early as possible (The latter has to be run as late as possible to
ensure correctness). Running earlier means we can reschedule these pairs
as we see fit.
Running earlier in the machine pass pipeline is good, but would mean
teaching many more passes about `hasLabelMustBeEmitted`. Splitting the
basic blocks also pessimises possible optimisations because some
optimisations are MBB-local, and others are disabled if the block has
its address taken (which is notionally what `hasLabelMustBeEmitted`
means).
This patch uses a new approach of setting the pre-instruction symbol on
the AUIPC instruction to a temporary symbol and referencing that. This
avoids splitting the basic block, but allows us to reference exactly the
instruction that we need to. Notionally, this approach seems more
correct because we do actually want to address a specific instruction.
This then allows the pass to be moved much earlier in the pass pipeline,
before both scheduling and register allocation. However, to do so we
must leave the MIR in SSA form (by not redefining registers), and so use
a virtual register for the intermediate value. By using this virtual
register, this pass now has to come before register allocation.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82988
Summary:
The test case started to hoist bitcasts to upper BB after D81730.
Reverted unintentional logic change. Some instructions may have zero cost but
will not be hoisted by different limitation so should be counted for threshold.
Reviewers: aprantl, arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82761
