MipsMCAsmInfo was using '$' prefix for Mips32 and '.L' for Mips64
regardless of -target-abi option. By passing MCTargetOptions to MCAsmInfo
we can find out Mips ABI and pick appropriate prefix.
Tags: #llvm, #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66795
Summary:
The default implementation of the describeLoadedValue() hook uses the
MoveImm property to determine if an instruction moves an immediate. If
an instruction has that property the function returns the second
operand, assuming that that is the immediate value the instruction
moves. As far as I can tell, the MoveImm property does not imply that
the second operand is the immediate value, nor that any other operand
necessarily holds the immediate value; it just means that the
instruction moves some immediate value.
One example where the second operand is not the immediate is SystemZ's
LZER instruction, which moves a zero immediate implicitly: $f0S = LZER.
That case triggered an out-of-bound assertion when getting the operand.
I have added a test case for that instruction.
Another example is ARM's MVN instruction, which holds the logical
bitwise NOT'd value of the immediate that is moved. For the following
reproducer:
extern void foo(int);
int main() { foo(-11); }
an incorrect call site value would be emitted:
$ clang --target=arm foo.c -O1 -g -Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values \
-c -o - | ./build/bin/llvm-dwarfdump - | \
grep -A2 call_site_parameter
0x00000058: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_reg0 R0)
DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value (DW_OP_lit10)
Another example is the A2_combineii instruction on Hexagon which moves
two immediates to a super-register: $d0 = A2_combineii 20, 10.
Perhaps these are rare exceptions, and most MoveImm instructions hold
the immediate in the second operand, but in my opinion the default
implementation of the hook should only describe values that it can, by
some contract, guarantee are safe to describe, rather than leaving it up
to the targets to override the exceptions, as that can silently result
in incorrect call site values.
This patch adds X86's relevant move immediate instructions to the
target's hook implementation, so this commit should be a NFC for that
target. We need to do the same for ARM and AArch64.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69109
Select vector G_MUL for MIPS32 with MSA. We have to set bank
for vector operands to fprb and selectImpl will do the rest.
Manual selection of G_MUL is now done for gprb only.
__builtin_msa_mulv_<format> will be transformed into G_MUL
in legalizeIntrinsic and selected in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69310
Select vector G_SUB for MIPS32 with MSA. We have to set bank
for vector operands to fprb and selectImpl will do the rest.
__builtin_msa_subv_<format> will be transformed into G_SUB
in legalizeIntrinsic and selected in the same way.
__builtin_msa_subvi_<format> will be directly selected into
SUBVI_<format> in legalizeIntrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69306
We should do the fold only if both constants are plain,
non-opaque constants, at least that is the DAG.FoldConstantArithmetic()
requirement.
And if the constant we are comparing with is zero - we shouldn't be
trying to do this fold in the first place.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43769
This adds support for reserving GPRs such that the compiler will not
choose a register for register allocation. The implementation follows
the same design as for AArch64; each reserved register becomes a target
feature and used for getting the reserved registers for a given
MachineFunction. The backend checks that it does not need to write to
any reserved register; if it does a relevant error is generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67185
Summary:
This fold, helps recover from the rest of the D62266 ARM regressions.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/TvpC
Note that while the fold is quite flexible, i've restricted it
to the single interesting pattern at the moment.
Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, deadalnix
Reviewed By: deadalnix
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62450
Summary:
Note: This patch should not be pushed until SVN has become read-only.
It should be the first patch committed directly to GitHub.
This patch updates git-llvm to check for merge commits and then push
changes to GitHub if none are found. All logic related to SVN has been
removed.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: lenary, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67772
This adds an instcombine matcher for code that attempts to perform signed
saturating arithmetic by casting to a higher type. Unsigned cases are already
matched, this adds extra matches for the more complex signed cases, which
involves matching the min(max(add a b)) nodes with proper extends to ensure
legality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68651
llvm-svn: 375505
MachineRegisterInfo::createGenericVirtualRegister sets
RegClassOrRegBank to static_cast<RegisterBank *>(nullptr).
MIParser on the other hand doesn't. When we attempt to constrain
Register Class on such VReg, additional COPY is generated.
This way we avoid COPY instructions showing in test that have MIR
input while they are not present with llvm-ir input that was used
to create given MIR for a -run-pass test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68946
llvm-svn: 375502
Select vector G_ADD for MIPS32 with MSA. We have to set bank
for vector operands to fprb and selectImpl will do the rest.
__builtin_msa_addv_<format> will be transformed into G_ADD
in legalizeIntrinsic and selected in the same way.
__builtin_msa_addvi_<format> will be directly selected into
ADDVI_<format> in legalizeIntrinsic. MIR tests for it have
unnecessary additional copies. Capture current state of tests
with run-pass=legalizer with a test in test/CodeGen/MIR/Mips.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68984
llvm-svn: 375501
This re-commits r375152 which was pulled in r375233 because it broke
the EXPENSIVE_CHECKS bot on Windows.
The reason for the failure was a bug in the pass that the commit turned
on by default. This patch fixes that bug and turns the pass back on.
This patch has been verified on the buildbot that originally failed
thanks to Simon Pilgrim.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52431
llvm-svn: 375497
Currently injected-sources-native.test fails with "Expected<T>
value was in success state.
(Note: Expected<T> values in success mode must still be checked
prior to being destroyed)"
when llvm is compiled with LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS in Release.
The problem is that getStringForID returns Expected<StringRef>
and Expected value must always be checked, even if it is in success state.
Checking with assert only helps in Debug and is wrong.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69251
llvm-svn: 375492
ExecutionEngine.cpp contains the anchor() for the ObjectCache base class, so we
need an explicit dependency on it.
Patch by Stephen Neuendorffer. Thanks Stephen!
llvm-svn: 375461
Teach the CombinerHelper how to turn shuffle_vectors, that
concatenate vectors, into concat_vectors and add this combine
to the AArch64 pre-legalizer combiner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69149
llvm-svn: 375452
Only handle simple inter-block redefs of m0 to the same value. This
avoids interference from redefs of m0 in SILoadStoreOptimzer. I was
initially teaching that pass to ignore redefs of m0, but having them
not exist beforehand is much simpler.
This is in preparation for deleting the current special m0 handling in
SIFixSGPRCopies to allow the register coalescer to handle the
difficult cases.
llvm-svn: 375449
r375293 removed the SGPR spilling with scalar stores path, so this is
no longer necessary. This also always had the defect of adding the def
even when this path wasn't in use.
llvm-svn: 375448
If a PHI defines AGPR legalize its operands to AGPR.
At the moment we can get an AGPR PHI with VGPR operands.
I am not aware of any problems as it seems to be handled
gracefully in RA, but this is not right anyway.
It also slightly decreases VGPR pressure in some cases
because we do not have to a copy via VGPR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69206
llvm-svn: 375446
