The memory form of the xmm->xmm version only writes 64-bits. If we use it in the folding tables and its get used for a stack spill, only half the slot will be written. Then a reload may read all 128-bits which will pull in garbage. But without the spill the upper bits of the register would have been zero. By not folding we would preserve the zeros.
llvm-svn: 321950
We don't do fine grained feature control like this on features prior to AVX512.
We do still have checks in place in the assembly parser itself that prevents %zmm references or %xmm16-31 from being parsed without at least -mattr=avx512f. Same for rounding control and mask operands. That will prevent the table matcher from matching for any instructions that need those features and that's probably good enough.
llvm-svn: 321947
This is the last step needed to fix PR33325:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33325
We're trading branch and compares for loads and logic ops.
This makes the code smaller and hopefully faster in most cases.
The 24-byte test shows an interesting construct: we load the trailing scalar
elements into vector registers and generate the same pcmpeq+movmsk code that
we expected for a pair of full vector elements (see the 32- and 64-byte tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41714
llvm-svn: 321934
Without this we allow "vmovd %rax, %xmm0", but not "vmovd %rax, %xmm16"
This exists due to continue a silly bug where really old versions of the GNU assembler required movd instead of movq on these instructions. This compatibility hack then crept forward to avx version too, but we didn't propagate it to avx512.
llvm-svn: 321903
This behavior existed to work with an old version of the gnu assembler on MacOS that only accepted this form. Newer versions of GNU assembler and the current LLVM derived version of the assembler on MacOS support movq as well.
llvm-svn: 321898
This custom inserter was added in r124272 at which time it added about bunch of Defs for Win64. In r150708, those defs were removed leaving only the "return BB". So I think this means the custom inserter is a NOP these days.
This patch removes the remaining code and stops tagging the instructions for custom insertion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41671
llvm-svn: 321747
Currently we use SIGN_EXTEND in lowerMasksToReg as part of calling convention setup, but we don't require a specific value for the upper bits.
This patch changes it to ANY_EXTEND which will be lowered as SIGN_EXTEND if it ends up sticking around.
llvm-svn: 321746
Currently it's not possible to access MCSubtargetInfo from a TgtMCAsmBackend.
D20830 threaded an MCSubtargetInfo reference through
MCAsmBackend::relaxInstruction, but this isn't the only function that would
benefit from access. This patch removes the Triple and CPUString arguments
from createMCAsmBackend and replaces them with MCSubtargetInfo.
This patch just changes the interface without making any intentional
functional changes. Once in, several cleanups are possible:
* Get rid of the awkward MCSubtargetInfo handling in ARMAsmBackend
* Support 16-bit instructions when valid in MipsAsmBackend::writeNopData
* Get rid of the CPU string parsing in X86AsmBackend and just use a SubtargetFeature for HasNopl
* Emit 16-bit nops in RISCVAsmBackend::writeNopData if the compressed instruction set extension is enabled (see D41221)
This change initially exposed PR35686, which has since been resolved in r321026.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41349
llvm-svn: 321692
This is an extension of D31156 with the goal that we'll allow memcmp() == 0 expansion
for x86 to use 2 pairs of loads per block.
The memcmp expansion pass (formerly part of CGP) will generate this kind of pattern
with oversized integer compares, so we want to transform these into x86-specific vector
nodes before legalization splits things into scalar chunks.
See PR33325 for more details:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33325
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41618
llvm-svn: 321656
Currently the promotion for these ignores the normal getTypeToPromoteTo and instead just tries to double the element width. This is because the default behavior of getTypeToPromote to just adds 1 to the SimpleVT, which has the affect of increasing the element count while keeping the scalar size the same.
If multiple steps are required to get to a legal operation type, int_to_fp will be promoted multiple times. And fp_to_int will keep trying wider types in a loop until it finds one that works.
getTypeToPromoteTo does have the ability to query a promotion map to get the type and not do the increasing behavior. It seems better to just let the target specify the promotion type in the map explicitly instead of letting the legalizer iterate via widening.
FWIW, it's worth I think for any other vector operations that need to be promoted, we have to specify the type explicitly because the default behavior of getTypeToPromote isn't useful for vectors. The other types of promotion already require either the element count is constant or the total vector width is constant, but neither happens by incrementing the SimpleVT enum.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40664
llvm-svn: 321629
We can use zmm move with zero masking for this. We already had patterns for using a masked move, but we didn't check for the zero masking case separately.
llvm-svn: 321612
The CONCAT_VECTORS will be lowered to INSERT_SUBVECTOR later. In the modified cases this seems to be enough to trick a later DAG combine into running in a different order than allows the ANDs to be removed.
I'll admit this is a bit of a hack that happens to work, but using CONCAT_VECTORS is more consistent with other legalization code anyway.
llvm-svn: 321611
Don't combine buildvector(binop(),binop(),binop(),binop()) -> binop(buildvector(), buildvector()) if its a splat - keep the binop scalar and just splat the result to avoid large vector constants.
llvm-svn: 321607
We end up using an i8 load via an isel pattern from v8i1 anyway. This just makes it more explicit. This seems to improve codgen in some cases and I'd like to kill off some of the load patterns.
llvm-svn: 321598
As noted in PR34686, we are relying on a PSHUFD+PSHUFLW+PSHUFHW shuffle chain for most general vXi16 unary shuffles.
This patch checks for simpler PSHUFLW+PSHUFD and PSHUFHW+PSHUFD cases beforehand, building on some existing code that just handled splat shuffles.
By doing so we also prevent premature use of PSHUFB shuffles which can be slower and require the creation/loading of constant shuffle masks.
We now have the 'fast-variable-shuffle' option for hardware that prefers combining 2 or more shuffles to VPSHUFB etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38318
llvm-svn: 321553
Previously we used an extend from v8i1 to v8i32/v8i64. Then extracted to the final width. But if we have VLX we should extract first. This way we don't end up with an overly large extend.
This allows us to use vcmpeq to make all ones for the sign extend when DQI isn't available. Otherwise we get a VPTERNLOG.
If we make v2i1/v4i1 legal like proposed in D41560, we could always do this and rely on the lowering of the extend to widen when necessary.
llvm-svn: 321538
-Use MinAlign instead of std::min.
-Use SelectionDAG::getMemBasePlusOffset.
-Apply offset to the pointer info for the second load/store created.
llvm-svn: 321536
The exception handler thunk needs to reference the LSDA of the parent
function, which won't be emitted if it's available_externally.
Fixes PR35736. ThinLTO ends up producing available_externally functions
that use _CxxFrameHandler3.
llvm-svn: 321532
If there are 17 or more leading zeros to the v4i32 elements, then we can use PMADD for the integer multiply when PMULLD is unavailable or slow.
The 17 bits need to be zero as the PMADDWD performs a v8i16 signed-mul-extend + pairwise-add - the upper 16 so we're adding a zero pair and the 17th bit so we don't incorrectly sign extend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41484
llvm-svn: 321516
My original implementation ran as a DAG combine post type legalization, but it turns out we don't run that DAG combine step if type legalization didn't change anything. Attempts to make the combine run before type legalization as well hit other issues.
So just do it in LowerMUL where we can catch more cases.
llvm-svn: 321496
Returning SDValue() means nothing changed, SDValue(N,0) means there was a change but the worklist management was taken care of.
I don't know if this has a real effect other than making sure the combine counter in the DAG combiner gets updated, but it is the correct thing to do.
llvm-svn: 321463
Normally we catch this during lowering, but vXi64 mul is considered legal when we have AVX512DQ.
This DAG combine allows us to avoid PMULLQ with AVX512DQ if we can prove its unnecessary. PMULLQ is 3 uops that take 4 cycles each. While pmuldq/pmuludq is only one 4 cycle uop.
llvm-svn: 321437
Match regular x87 memory fold instructions with load/sideeffects tags, to prevent the schedulers from re-ordering them across the fnstcw/fldcw sequences for truncating stores while they are still pseudo during the stack conversion pass.
llvm-svn: 321424
Previously we extended v2i1 to v2f64 and then tried to use cvtuqq2pd/cvtqq2pd, but that only works with avx512dq. So we ended up scalarizing it. Now we widen to v4i1 first and extend to v4i32.
llvm-svn: 321420
Immediately after it is created we check if its equal to another EVT. Then we inconsistently use one or the other variables in the code below.
Instead do the equality check directly on the getValueType result and remove the variable. Use the origina VT variable throughout the remaining code.
llvm-svn: 321406
getOperand returns an SDValue that contains the node and the result number. There is no guarantee that the result number if 0. By using the -> operator we are calling SDNode::getValueType rather than SDValue::getValueType. This requires supplying a result number and we shouldn't assume it was 0.
I don't have a test case. Just noticed while cleaning up some other code and saw that it occurred in other places.
llvm-svn: 321397
Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared
library build. The shared library build broke because there was a
missing LLVMBuild dependency from lib/Passes (which calls
TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis) to lib/Target. As far as I can
tell, this problem was always there but was somehow masked
before (perhaps because TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis was a
virtual function).
Original commit message:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321375
Despite what the comment said there isn't better codegen for 512-bit vectors. The 128/256/512 bit implementation jus stores to memory and loads an element. There's no advantage to doing that with a larger size. In fact in many cases it causes a stack realignment and generates worse code.
llvm-svn: 321369
Previously prefetch was only considered legal if sse was enabled, but it should be supported with 3dnow as well.
The prfchw flag now imply at least some form of prefetch without the write hint is available, either the sse or 3dnow version. This is true even if 3dnow and sse are explicitly disabled.
Similarly prefetchwt1 feature implies availability of prefetchw and the the prefetcht0/1/2/nta instructions. This way we can support _MM_HINT_ET0 using prefetchw and _MM_HINT_ET1 with prefetchwt1. And its assumed that if we have levels for the write hint we would have levels for the non-write hint, thus why we enable the sse prefetch instructions.
I believe this behavior is consistent with gcc. I've updated the prefetch.ll to test all of these combinations.
llvm-svn: 321335
This should only affect what we do for v8i16. Previously we went to v8i64, but if we have VLX we only need v8i32. This prevents an unnecessary zmm usage.
llvm-svn: 321303
We should have equally good shuffle options for v8i32 with VLX. This was spotted during my attempts to remove 512-bit vectors from SKX.
We still use 512-bits for v16i1, v32i1, and v64i1. I'm less sure we can handle those well with narrower vectors. i32 and i64 element sizes get the best shuffle support.
llvm-svn: 321291
Summary:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.
See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html
I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.
Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464
llvm-svn: 321234
Multiple Closure objects can be created and stored for a single function. It's not a good idea to devote so many fields of it to storing pointers and references to global data structures of the pass. The closure class should only store the things needed to represent the closure itself.
This patch refactors many of the methods of Closure to belong to the pass object and to pass around a reference to the current Closure. The Closure class gains a few simple methods to add instructions and edges, and to return iterators to edges and instructions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41327
llvm-svn: 321213
Gather/scatter can implicitly sign extend from i32->i64 on indices. So if we know the sign bit of the input to a zext is 0 we can use the implicit extension.
llvm-svn: 321209
This patch turns shuffles of fadd/fsub with fmul into fmsubadd.
Patch by Dmitry Venikov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40335
llvm-svn: 321200
The gather instruction will implicitly sign extend to the pointer width, we don't need to further extend it. This can prevent unnecessary splitting in some cases.
There's still an issue that lowering on non-VLX can introduce another sign extend that doesn't get combined with shifts from a lowered sign_extend_inreg.
llvm-svn: 321152
Not sure how to test this cause I think the worst that happens is that we don't revisit the node a second time to look for additional combines. We used UpdateNodeOperands so the updating the DAG work was already done.
llvm-svn: 321148
We try to prevent shuffle combining to value types that would stop the folding of masked operations, but by just returning early, we were failing to try different shuffle types.
The TODOs are all still relevant here to improve codegen but we're lacking test examples.
llvm-svn: 321085
As mentioned in D38318 and D40865, modern Intel processors prefer to combine multiple shuffles to a variable shuffle mask (PSHUFB/VPERMPS etc.) instead of having multiple stage 'fixed' shuffles which put more pressure on Port 5 (at the expense of extra shuffle mask loads).
This patch provides a FeatureFastVariableShuffle target flag for Haswell+ CPUs that prefers combining 2 or more fixed shuffles to a single variable shuffle (default is 3 shuffles).
The long term aim is to drive more of this from schedule data (probably via the MC) but we're not close to being ready for that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41323
llvm-svn: 321074
Extension to D39729 which performed this for vXi16, with the same bit flipping to handle SMAX/SMIN/UMAX cases, vXi8 UMIN horizontal reductions can be performed.
This makes use of the fact that by performing a pair-wise i8 SHUFFLE/UMIN before PHMINPOSUW, we both get the UMIN of each pair but also zero-extend the upper bits ready for v8i16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41294
llvm-svn: 321070
