There is a combine that was hiding these tests
not actually testing what they should be, although
they were producing the expected end result.
llvm-svn: 351698
This causes a couple of changes in the upgrade tests as signed/unsigned eq/ne are equivalent and we constant fold true/false codes, these changes are the same as what we already do for avx512 cmp/ucmp.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
llvm-svn: 351697
This was crashing in the predicate function assuming the value
is a vector.
Copy more of what AArch64 uses. This probably needs more refinement
later, but I don't exactly understand what it means in some cases,
particularly since any legalization for these seems to be missing.
llvm-svn: 351693
We were upgrading these to the new style VPCOM/VPCOMU intrinsics (which includes the condition code immediate), but we'll be getting rid of those shortly, so convert these to generics first.
This causes a couple of changes in the upgrade tests as signed/unsigned eq/ne are equivalent and we constant fold true/false codes, these changes are the same as what we already do for avx512 cmp/ucmp.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
llvm-svn: 351690
These intrinsics can always be replaced with generic integer comparisons without any regression in codegen, even for -O0/-fast-isel cases.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
A future commit will remove/autoupgrade the existing VPCOM/VPCOMU llvm intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 351688
Prior to SSE41 (and sometimes on AVX1), vector select has to be performed as a ((X & C)|(Y & ~C)) bit select.
Exposes a couple of issues with the min/max reduction costs (which only go down to SSE42 for some reason).
The increase pre-SSE41 selection costs also prevent a couple of tests from firing any longer, so I've either tweaked the target or added AVX tests as well to the existing SSE2 tests.
llvm-svn: 351685
This extends the CMake cross compilation logic so that AVR can be set as
the default target triple, and thus the generic codegen tests can be
run.
This used to be possible on AVR; the CMake configuration files have
since been changed.
With this patch, 'cmake -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=avr-unknown-unknown' can
be passed on the command line, making the `-mcpu` argument redundant to
'llc' and friends.
llvm-svn: 351678
These were originally introduced in a copy-paste committed in r351526.
The reference to 't2_so_imm' have been updated to 'imm_com8' so the
comment is now accurate.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for noticing this.
llvm-svn: 351674
Prior to this patch, the AVR::LDWRdPtr instruction was always lowered to
instructions of this pattern:
ld $GPR8, [PTR:XYZ]+
ld $GPR8, [PTR]+1
This has a problem; the [PTR] is incremented in-place once, but never
decremented.
Future uses of the same pointer will use the now clobbered value,
leading to the pointer being incorrect by an offset of one.
This patch modifies the expansion code of the LDWRdPtr pseudo
instruction so that the pointer variable is not silently clobbered in
future uses in the same live range.
Bug first reported by Keshav Kini.
Patch by Kaushik Phatak.
llvm-svn: 351673
This reverts commit r351544.
In that commit, I had mistakenly misattributed the issue submitter as
the patch author, Kaushik Phatak.
The patch will be recommitted immediately with the correct attribution.
llvm-svn: 351672
The debug directory contains the rwa file address of itself,
which is updated on write. Add a testcase for this existing
functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56876
llvm-svn: 351659
Since these are intended to be short and succinct, I've used the SPDX
full name. It's human readable, but formally agreed upon and will be
part of the SPDX spec for licenses.
llvm-svn: 351649
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Followup to D55745, this time handling comparisons with ugt and ult
predicates (which are the canonical forms for non-equality predicates).
For ctlz we can convert into a simple icmp, for cttz we can convert
into a mask check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56355
llvm-svn: 351645
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
a stray single '\r' from one file. These are the last line ending issues
I can find in the files containing parts of LLVM's file headers.
llvm-svn: 351634
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
This modification of the currently unused inter-procedural constant
propagation pass (IPConstantPropagation) shows how abstract call sites
enable optimization of callback calls alongside direct and indirect
calls. Through minimal changes, mostly dealing with the partial mapping
of callbacks, inter-procedural constant propagation was enabled for
callbacks, e.g., OpenMP runtime calls or pthreads_create.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56447
llvm-svn: 351628
An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract call site
represents a direct or indirect call site it behaves like a stripped
down version of a normal call site object. The abstract call site can
also represent a callback call, thus the fact that the initially
called function (=broker) may invoke a third one (=callback callee).
In this case, the abstract call side hides the middle man, hence the
broker function. The result is a representation of the callback call,
inside the broker, but in the context of the original instruction that
invoked the broker.
Again, there are up to three functions involved when we talk about
callback call sites. The caller (1), which invokes the broker
function. The broker function (2), that may or may not invoke the
callback callee. And finally the callback callee (3), which is the
target of the callback call.
The abstract call site will handle the mapping from parameters to
arguments depending on the semantic of the broker function. However,
it is important to note that the mapping is often partial. Thus, some
arguments of the call/invoke instruction are mapped to parameters of
the callee while others are not. At the same time, arguments of the
callback callee might be unknown, thus "null" if queried.
This patch introduces also !callback metadata which describe how a
callback broker maps from parameters to arguments. This metadata is
directly created by clang for known broker functions, provided through
source code attributes by the user, or later deduced by analyses.
For motivation and additional information please see the corresponding
talk (slides/video)
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#talk20
as well as the LCPC paper
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt_lcpc18.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54498
llvm-svn: 351627
Thanks to Nikita Popov for pointing out this missed case.
This is a follow-up to r351411, which disabled function merging for
vararg functions outright due to a miscompile (see llvm.org/PR40345).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56865
llvm-svn: 351624
If an inherently cold function is found, mark it as cold. For now this
means applying the `cold` and `minsize` attributes.
As a drive-by, revisit and clean up the criteria for considering a
function for splitting. Add tests.
llvm-svn: 351623
CodeExtractor permits extracting a region of blocks from a function even
when values defined within the region are used outside of it.
This is typically done by creating an alloca in the original function
and reloading the alloca after a call to the extracted function.
Wrap the reload in lifetime start/end markers to promote stack coloring.
Suggested by Sergei Kachkov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56045
llvm-svn: 351621
