Finalization can introduce new blocks we need to outline as well so it
makes sense to identify the blocks that need to be outlined after
finalization happened. There was also a minor unit test adjustment to
account for the fact that we have a single outlined exit block now.
On KNL targets, we widen 128/256-bit strict_fsetcc nodes to
512-bits without forcing the upper bits to zero. This can cause
spurious exceptions due to garbage upper bits. This behavior was
inherited from the non-strict case where the spurious exception
isn't a problem.
Currently, BPF does not support dynamic static allocation.
For a program like below:
extern void bar(int *);
void foo(int n) {
int a[n];
bar(a);
}
The current error message looks like:
unimplemented operand
UNREACHABLE executed at /.../llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp:199!
Let us make error message explicit so it will be clear to the user
what is the problem. With this patch, the error message looks like:
fatal error: error in backend: Unsupported dynamic stack allocation
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74521
Reapply 8a56d64d7620b3764f10f03f3a1e307fcdd72c2f with minor fixes.
The problem was that cancellation can cause new edges to the parallel
region exit block which is not outlined. The CodeExtractor will encode
the information which "exit" was taken as a return value. The fix is to
ensure we do not return any value from the outlined function, to prevent
control to value conversion we ensure a single exit block for the
outlined region.
This reverts commit 3aac953afa34885a72df96f2b703b65f85cbb149.
Patchable statepoint is lowered into sequence of nops, so zeroed call target
should not be on register. It is better to use getTargetConstant instead
of getConstant to select zero constant for call target.
Reviewers: reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74465
When SI_IF is inserted, it constrains the source register with a
register class, which was quite likely a G_ICMP. This was incorrectly
treating it as a scalar, and then applyMappingImpl would end up
producing invalid MIR since this was unexpected.
Also fix not using all VGPR sources for vcc outputs.
These tests fail when the default is switched to assume IEEE denormal
handling. I'm not sure if PPC really has a way to control the denormal
input handling.
This patch is replacements missed in my last change doing this across LLVM.
No functional change, although I think there was a missing typename
in struct conjunction that is now fixed.
In order to fix PR44560 and to prepare for loop transformations we now
finalize a function late, which will also do the outlining late. The
logic is as before but the actual outlining step happens now after the
function was fully constructed. Once we have loop transformations we
can apply them in the finalize step before the outlining.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74372
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
If we have a replacement for a value, via AAValueSimplify, the original
value will lose all its uses. Thus, as long as a value is simplified we
can skip the uses in checkForAllUses, given that these uses are
transitive uses for the simplified version and will therefore affect the
simplified version as necessary.
Since this allowed us to remove calls without side-effects and a known
return value, we need to make sure not to eliminate `musttail` calls.
Those we keep around, or later remove the entire `musttail` call chain.
We relied on wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead before but that functions
does not take assumed information, especially for calls, into account.
The replacement, AAIsDead::isAssumeSideEffectFree, does.
This change makes AAIsDeadCallSiteReturn more complex as we can have
a dead call or only dead users.
The test have been modified to include a side effect where there was
none in order to keep the coverage.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73311
Current tail duplication embedded in MBP duplicates a BB into all or none of its predecessors without too much cost analysis. So sometimes it is duplicated into cold predecessors, and in other cases it may miss the duplication into hot predecessors.
This patch improves tail duplication in 3 aspects:
A successor can be duplicated into part of its predecessors.
A more fine-grained benefit analysis, combined with 1, now a successor is duplicated into hot predecessors only.
If a successor can't be duplicated into one predecessor, it doesn't impact the duplication into other predecessors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73387
Tablegen's DAGISelMatcher emits integers in a VBR format,
so if an integer is below 128 it can fit into a single
byte, otherwise high bit is set, next byte is used etc.
MatcherTable is essentially an unsigned char table. When
SelectionDAGISel parses the table it does a reverse translation.
In a situation when numeric value of an integer to emit is
unknown it can be emitted not as OPC_EmitInteger but as
OPC_EmitStringInteger using a symbolic name of the value.
In this situation the value should not exceed 127.
One of the situations when OPC_EmitStringInteger is used is
if we need to emit a subreg into a matcher table. However,
number of subregs can exceed 127. Currently last defined subreg
for AMDGPU is 192. That results in a silent bug in the ISel
with matcher reading from an invalid offset.
Fixed this bug to emit actual VBR encoded value for a subregs
which value exceeds 127.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74368
function_ref is non-owning, so if we get it as a parameter in constructor,
our reference goes out-of-scope as soon as constructor returns.
Instead, let's just take it as a parameter to the actual `generate()` call
Various parts of the LLVM code generator assume that the address
argument of a dbg.declare is not a `ptrtoint`-of-alloca. ASan breaks
this assumption, and this results in local variables sometimes being
unavailable at -O0.
GlobalISel, SelectionDAG, and FastISel all do not appear to expect
dbg.declares to have a `ptrtoint` as an operand. This means that they do
not place entry block allocas in the usual side table reserved for local
variables available in the whole function scope. This isn't always a
problem, as LLVM can try to lower the dbg.declare to a DBG_VALUE, but
those DBG_VALUEs can get dropped for all the usual reasons DBG_VALUEs
get dropped. In the ObjC test case I'm looking at, the cause happens to
be that `replaceDbgDeclare` has hoisted dbg.declares into the entry
block, causing LiveDebugValues to "kill" the DBG_VALUEs because the
lexical dominance check fails.
To address this, I propose:
1) Have ASan (always) pass an alloca to dbg.declares (this patch). This
is a narrow bugfix for -O0 debugging.
2) Make replaceDbgDeclare not move dbg.declares around. This should be a
generic improvement for optimized debug info, as it would prevent the
lexical dominance check in LiveDebugValues from killing as many
variables.
This means reverting llvm/r227544, which fixed an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386) but no longer seems to be necessary. I was able to
complete a stage2 build with the revert in place.
rdar://54688991
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74369
Summary:
This was a very odd API, where you had to pass a flag into a zext
function to say whether the extended bits really were zero or not. All
callers passed in a literal true or false.
I think it's much clearer to make the function name reflect the
operation being performed on the value we're tracking (rather than on
the KnownBits Zero and One fields), so zext means the value is being
zero extended and new function anyext means the value is being extended
with unknown bits.
NFC.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74482
Summary:
Currently, we only have nice exploration for LEA instruction,
while for the rest, we rely on `randomizeUnsetVariables()`
to sometimes generate something interesting.
While that works, it isn't very reliable in coverage :)
Here, i'm making an assumption that while we may want to explore
multi-instruction configs, we are most interested in the
characteristics of the main instruction we were asked about.
Which we can do, by taking the existing `randomizeMCOperand()`,
and turning it on it's head - instead of relying on it to randomly fill
one of the interesting values, let's pregenerate all the possible interesting
values for the variable, and then generate as much `InstructionTemplate`
combinations of these possible values for variables as needed/possible.
Of course, that requires invasive changes to no longer pass just the
naked `Instruction`, but sometimes partially filled `InstructionTemplate`.
As it can be seen from the test, this allows us to explore
`X86::OperandType::OPERAND_COND_CODE` for instructions
that take such an operand.
I'm hoping this will greatly simplify exploration.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: orodley, mgorny, sdardis, tschuett, jrtc27, atanasyan, mstojanovic, andreadb, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74156
Summary:
Bail out early for scalable vectors. As global variables are not expected
to be scalable.
Use explicit call of getFixedSize() to assert on places where scalable size
doesn't make sense.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, apazos, huntergr, willlovett
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74424
This version includes a fix for a set of crashes caused by marking
values depending on a yet unknown & tracked call as overdefined.
In some cases, we would later discover that the call has a constant
result and try to mark a user of it as constant, although it was already
marked as overdefined. Most instruction handlers bail out early if the
instruction is already overdefined. But that is not necessary for
CastInsts for example. By skipping values that depend on skipped
calls, we resolve the crashes and also improve the precision in some
cases (see resolvedundefsin-tracked-fn.ll).
Note that we may not skip PHI nodes that may depend on a skipped call,
but they can be safely marked as overdefined, as we bail out early if
the PHI node is overdefined.
This reverts the revert commit
a74b31a3e9cd844c7ce2087978568e3f5ec8519.
This will create e.g. a compiler-rt target that'll build compiler-rt for
all configured targets, similar to how the runtimes umbrella target
builds all the runtimes for all configured targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74458
When we have to widen to a 64-bit register, we have to emit a SUBREG_TO_REG.
Add a general-purpose widening helpe which emits the correct SUBREG_TO_REG
instruction based off of a desired size and add a testcase.
Also remove some asserts which are technically incorrect in `emitTestBit`.
- p0 doesn't count as a scalar type, so we need to check `!Ty.isVector()`
instead
- Whenever we have a s1, the Size/Bit checks are too conservative, so just
remove them
Replace these asserts with less conservative ones where applicable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74427
Summary:
Passes ORE, BPI, BFI are not being preserved by Loop passes, hence it
is incorrect to retrieve these passes as cached.
This patch makes the loop passes in question compute a new instance.
In some of these cases, however, it may be beneficial to change the Loop pass to
a Function pass instead, similar to the change for LoopUnrollAndJam.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dmgreen, jdoerfert, reames
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, Whitney, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72891
Summary:
As far as I can tell, the SFINAE was broken; there is no such thing as
std::is_trivially_constructible<T>::type.
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74380
In a previous patch I changed `std::decay<T>::type` to `std::decay<T>`
rather than `std::decay_t<T>`. This seems to have broken the build
*only for clang-cl*. I don't know why.
Submitting with post-commit review because this is an obvious fix for a
build breakage and we've verified that it fixes the breakage.
Summary:
GNU objdump prints the file format in lowercase, e.g. `elf64-x86-64`. llvm-objdump prints `ELF64-x86-64` right now, even though piping that into llvm-objcopy refuses that as a valid arch to use.
As an example of a problem this causes, see: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/779
Reviewers: MaskRay, jhenderson, alexshap
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: tpimh, sbc100, grimar, jvesely, nhaehnle, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74433
This has a really interesting side effect in that it improves some UMAX/UMIN reduction code which had redundant XOR(SHUFFLE(XOR(X,SIGNMASK)),SIGNMASK) patterns - the getNegatibleCost recognises it as FNEG(SHUFFLE(FNEG(X))).... We have a lot of FNEG patterns bitcasted to the integer domain for XOR signbit twiddling which is similar to what we do to allow UMAX/UMIN to be lowered using SMAX/SMIN.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74231
An option is added for PowerPC to disable use of non-volatile CR
register fields and avoid CR spilling in the prologue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69835
Added support for the intrinsic llvm.ppc.dcbfl and llvm.ppc.dcbflp.
These will be used for emitting cache control instructions dcbfl and dcbflp
which are actually mnemonics for using dcbf instruction with different
immediate arguments.
dcbfl ra, rb -> dcbf ra, rb, 1
dcbflp, ra, rb -> dcbf ra, rb, 3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68411
These are only legal on CI+. The test would fail in a debug build, but
not a release due to the partial selection since the pre-selection
legality assert only happens in a debug build.
The DWARFv2-4 specification for the line table header states that the
include directories and file name tables both end with a single null
byte. Prior to this change, the parser did not detect if this byte was
missing, because it also stopped reading the tables once it reached the
prologue end, as claimed by the header_length field. This change adds a
check that the terminator has been seen at the end of each table.
Reviewed by: dblaikie, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74413
The number of standard opcodes is defined to be opcode_base - 1, so a
value of 0 for the opcode_base caused a crash as an attempt was made to
reserve many entries in a vector. This change fixes the crash, by
issuing a warning and skipping reading of standard opcode lengths in the
event of an opcode_base of 0.
Reviewed by: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74309