Summary:
ds_ordered_count can now simultaneously operate on up to 4 dwords
in a single instruction, which are taken from (and returned to)
lanes 0..3 of a single VGPR.
Change-Id: I19b6e7b0732b617c10a779a7f9c0303eec7dd276
Reviewers: mareko, arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63716
llvm-svn: 364815
Also works around tablegen defect in selecting add with unused carry,
but if we have to manually select GEP, might as well handle add
manually.
llvm-svn: 364806
There are several things broken, but at least emit the right thing for
gfx9.
The import of the pattern with the unused carry out seems to not
work. Needs a special class for clamp, because OperandWithDefaultOps
doesn't really work.
llvm-svn: 364804
We can already widenSubVector to a specific type (of the same scalar type) - this variant just specifies the target vector size.
This will be useful when CombineShuffleWithExtract relaxes the need to have the same scalar type for all shuffle operand subvector sources.
llvm-svn: 364803
Previously, the llvm-readelf documentation was essentially just a list
of differences to llvm-readobj. Since llvm-readelf is the more likely
goto tool for many people migrating to the LLVM toolchain, it seems like
it would be helpful to document all the switches in the llvm-readelf
document too. This change expands the options listed accordingly.
Additionally, they are unlikely to care what the differences are to
llvm-readobj, since they won't be familiar with the latter as there is
no GNU equivalent, so this change moves the "differences" section to
llvm-readobj's documentation.
Reviewed by: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63826
llvm-svn: 364800
Summary:
According to the ARMARM, the VQDMLADH, VQRDMLADH, VQDMLSDH and
VQRDMLSDH instructions handle their results as follows: "The base
variant writes the results into the lower element of each pair of
elements in the destination register, whereas the exchange variant
writes to the upper element in each pair". I.e., the initial content
of the output register affects the result, as usual, we model this
with an additional input.
Also, for 32-bit variants Qd is not allowed to be the same register as
Qm and Qn, we use @earlyclobber to indicate this.
This patch also changes vpred_r to vpred_n because the instructions
don't have an explicit 'inactive' operand.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard, simon_tatham
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64007
llvm-svn: 364796
Summary:
To be noted, this pattern is not unhandled by instcombine per-se,
it is somehow does end up being folded when one runs opt -O3,
but not if it's just -instcombine. Regardless, that fold is
indirect, depends on some other folds, and is thus blind
when there are extra uses.
This does address the regression being exposed in D63992.
https://godbolt.org/z/7DGltUhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/EPO0
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42459 | PR42459 ]]
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, huihuiz
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63993
llvm-svn: 364792
Summary:
Given pattern:
`icmp eq/ne (and ((x shift Q), (y oppositeshift K))), 0`
we should move shifts to the same hand of 'and', i.e. rewrite as
`icmp eq/ne (and (x shift (Q+K)), y), 0` iff `(Q+K) u< bitwidth(x)`
It might be tempting to not restrict this to situations where we know
we'd fold two shifts together, but i'm not sure what rules should there be
to avoid endless combine loops.
We pick the same shift that was originally used to shift the variable we picked to shift:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/6x1v
Should fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42399 | PR42399]].
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63829
llvm-svn: 364791
Summary:
The stride should depend on the wave size, not the hardware generation.
Also, the 32_FLOAT format is 0x16, not 16; though that shouldn't be
relevant.
Change-Id: I088f93bf6708974d085d1c50967f119061da6dc6
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, mareko
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63808
llvm-svn: 364788
Fix stack-use-after-scope errors from r364512. One instance was already
fixed in r364611 - this patch simplifies that fix and addresses one more
instance of similar code.
Discussed in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63905
llvm-svn: 364778
Summary:
SCRUB_LOOP_COMMENT_RE was introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D31285
This works for some loops.
However, we may generate lines with loop comments only.
And since we don't scrub leading white spaces, this will leave an empty
line there, and FileCheck will complain it.
eg: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/PR35812-neg-cmpxchg.ll:27:15:
error: found empty check string with prefix 'CHECK:'
; CHECK-NEXT:
This prevented us from using the `update_llc_test_checks.py` for quite some cases.
We should still keep the comment token there, so that we can safely
scrub the loop comment without breaking FileCheck.
Reviewers: timshen, hfinkel, lebedev.ri, RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63957
llvm-svn: 364775
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63829
*if* *both* shifts are one-use, we'd most likely want to produce `lshr`,
and not rely on ordering.
Also, there should likely be a *separate* fold to do this reordering.
llvm-svn: 364772
This was checking the size of the register with the value of the size,
which happens to be exec. Also fix assuming VCC is 64-bit to fix
wave32.
Also remove some untested handling for physical registers which is
skipped. This doesn't insert the V_CNDMASK_B32 if SCC is the physical
copy source. I'm not sure if this should be trying to handle this
special case instead of dealing with this in copyPhysReg.
llvm-svn: 364761
isLoopExiting should only be called for blocks in the loop. A follow
up patch makes this requirement an assertion.
I've updated the usage here, to only match for actual exit blocks. Previously,
it would also match blocks not in the loop.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63980
llvm-svn: 364750
To be noted, this pattern is not unhandled by instcombine per-se,
it is somehow does end up being folded when one runs opt -O3,
but not if it's just -instcombine. Regardless, that fold is
indirect, depends on some other folds, and is thus blind
when there are extra uses.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42459https://rise4fun.com/Alive/EPO0
llvm-svn: 364749
