building.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45067
This change attempts to do two things:
1) It separates out the state that is stored in the
MachineIRBuilder(InsertionPt, MF, MRI, InsertFunction etc) into a
separate object called MachineIRBuilderState.
2) Add the ability to constant fold operations while building instructions
(optionally). MachineIRBuilder is now refactored into a MachineIRBuilderBase
which contains lots of non foldable build methods and their implementation.
Instructions which can be constant folded/transformed are now in a class
called FoldableInstructionBuilder which uses CRTP to use the implementation
of the derived class for buildBinaryOps. Additionally buildInstr in the derived
class can be used to implement other kinds of transformations.
Also because of separation of state, given a MachineIRBuilder in an API,
if one wishes to use another MachineIRBuilder, a new one can be
constructed from the state locally. For eg,
void doFoo(MachineIRBuilder &B) {
MyCustomBuilder CustomB(B.getState());
// Use CustomB for building.
}
reviewed by : aemerson
llvm-svn: 329596
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
Added helpers to build G_FCONSTANT, along with matching ConstantFP and
unit tests for the same.
Sample usage.
auto MIB = Builder.buildFConstant(s32, 0.5); // Build IEEESingle
For Matching the above
const ConstantFP* Tmp;
mi_match(DstReg, MRI, m_GFCst(Tmp));
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44128
reviewed by: volkan
llvm-svn: 327152
Summary:
Fabs is a common floating-point operation, especially for some expansions. This patch adds
a new generic opcode for llvm.fabs.* intrinsic in order to avoid building/matching this intrinsic.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, rovka
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43864
llvm-svn: 326749
The base case for any_of was incorrectly returning true. Also add test
case which uses m_any_of(preds...) where none of the predicates are
true.
llvm-svn: 325848
Summary:
This patch adds templated functions to MachineIRBuilder for some opcodes
and adds pattern matcher support for G_AND and G_OR.
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43309
llvm-svn: 325162
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Summary:
As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some
operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support
for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions
about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized
before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if
you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually
but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize
type1 first.
Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept
separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of
code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make
illegal MIR more legal.
This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets
have been migrated) which resolves all these issues.
Here are the rules for shift and division:
for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV})
getActionDefinitions(BinOp)
.legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32
// If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64
.widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported
This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to
make illegal things legal.
Here's an example of a complex rule:
getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal
// We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that.
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0)
return false;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToPow2(0)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32
.widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported();
This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than
type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one
to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to:
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}})
In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when
AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now.
I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization
cost.
Future work:
* Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for
G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's
no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet.
* Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64)
* Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules.
* Improve initialization cost using constexpr
Possible future work:
* It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of
returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little
overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but
the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom.
With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization
change the opcode to something that's considered legal.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251
llvm-svn: 323681
Summary:
The improvements to the LegalizerInfo discussed in D42244 require that
LegalizerInfo::LegalizeAction be available for use in other classes. As such,
it needs to be moved out of LegalizerInfo. This has been done separately to the
next patch to minimize the noise in that patch.
llvm-svn: 323669
Summary:
`getAction(const InstrAspect &) const` breaks encapsulation by exposing
the smaller components that are used to decide how to legalize an
instruction.
This is a problem because we need to change the implementation of
LegalizerInfo so that it's able to describe particular type combinations
rather than just cartesian products of types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES has relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
This patch introduces LegalityQuery which provides all the information
needed by the legalizer to make a decision on whether something is legal
and how to legalize it.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: bogner, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42244
llvm-svn: 323342
r322086 removed the trailing information describing reg classes for each
register.
This patch adds printing reg classes next to every register when
individual operands/instructions/basic blocks are printed. In the case
of dumping MIR or printing a full function, by default don't print it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42239
llvm-svn: 322867
Planning to add support for named vregs. This puts is in a conundrum since
physregs are named as well. To rectify this we need to use a sigil other than
'%' for physregs in MIR. We've settled on using '$' for physregs but first we
must repurpose it from external symbols using it, which is what this commit is
all about. We think '&' will have familiar semantics for C/C++ users.
llvm-svn: 322146
This test fails when run on the sanitizer bot, and I do not see a good
way to fix it. The existing bogus target in MachineInstrTest.cpp is only
good enough to create instructions but not sufficient to insert them into
basic blocks. The addNodeToList ilist callback dereferences the pointer
to the MachineRegisterInfo. Adding MachineRegisterInfo would also require
TargetRegisterInfo, even a minimal implementation of that would be quite
complicated. I would be glad to add this back if someone can suggest a
better way to do it.
llvm-svn: 321784
Add iterator ranges for machine instruction phis, similar to the IR-level
phi ranges added in r303964. I updated a few places to use this. Besides
general code simplification, this change will allow removing a non-upstream
change from Swift's copy of LLVM (in a better way than my previous attempt
in http://reviews.llvm.org/D19080).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41672
llvm-svn: 321783
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by refactoring the
interfaces.
Also add support for printing with a null TargetIntrinsicInfo and no
MachineFunction.
llvm-svn: 321111
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by refactoring the
interfaces.
Before this patch we printed "<call frame instruction>" in the debug
output.
llvm-svn: 321084
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`<mcsymbol sym>` instead of `<MCSym=sym>`.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320685
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`liveout(...)` instead of `<regliveout>`.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320683
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`@foo` instead of `<ga:@foo>`.
Also print target flags in the MIR format since most of them are used on
global address operands.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320682
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing `target-index(target-specific) + 8` instead of `<ti#0+8>` and `target-index(target-specific) + 8` instead of `<ti#0-8>`.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320565
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`%const.0 + 8` instead of `<cp#0+8>` and `%const.0 - 8` instead of
`<cp#0-8>`.
Only debug syntax is affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41116
llvm-svn: 320564
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by refactoring the
interfaces.
Add support for operand subreg index as an immediate to debug printing
and use ::print in the MIRPrinter.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40965
llvm-svn: 320209
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This changes the interface of how targets describe how to legalize, see
the below description.
1. Interface for targets to describe how to legalize.
In GlobalISel, the API in the LegalizerInfo class is the main interface
for targets to specify which types are legal for which operations, and
what to do to turn illegal type/operation combinations into legal ones.
For each operation the type sizes that can be legalized without having
to change the size of the type are specified with a call to setAction.
This isn't different to how GlobalISel worked before. For example, for a
target that supports 32 and 64 bit adds natively:
for (auto Ty : {s32, s64})
setAction({G_ADD, 0, s32}, Legal);
or for a target that needs a library call for a 32 bit division:
setAction({G_SDIV, s32}, Libcall);
The main conceptual change to the LegalizerInfo API, is in specifying
how to legalize the type sizes for which a change of size is needed. For
example, in the above example, how to specify how all types from i1 to
i8388607 (apart from s32 and s64 which are legal) need to be legalized
and expressed in terms of operations on the available legal sizes
(again, i32 and i64 in this case). Before, the implementation only
allowed specifying power-of-2-sized types (e.g. setAction({G_ADD, 0,
s128}, NarrowScalar). A worse limitation was that if you'd wanted to
specify how to legalize all the sized types as allowed by the LLVM-IR
LangRef, i1 to i8388607, you'd have to call setAction 8388607-3 times
and probably would need a lot of memory to store all of these
specifications.
Instead, the legalization actions that need to change the size of the
type are specified now using a "SizeChangeStrategy". For example:
setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy(
G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerAndNarrowToLargest);
This example indicates that for type sizes for which there is a larger
size that can be legalized towards, do it by Widening the size.
For example, G_ADD on s17 will be legalized by first doing WidenScalar
to make it s32, after which it's legal.
The "NarrowToLargest" indicates what to do if there is no larger size
that can be legalized towards. E.g. G_ADD on s92 will be legalized by
doing NarrowScalar to s64.
Another example, taken from the ARM backend is:
for (unsigned Op : {G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) {
setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy(Op, 0,
widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise);
if (ST.hasDivideInARMMode())
setAction({Op, s32}, Legal);
else
setAction({Op, s32}, Libcall);
}
For this example, G_SDIV on s8, on a target without a divide
instruction, would be legalized by first doing action (WidenScalar,
s32), followed by (Libcall, s32).
The same principle is also followed for when the number of vector lanes
on vector data types need to be changed, e.g.:
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(16, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(2, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy(
G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise);
As currently implemented here, vector types are legalized by first
making the vector element size legal, followed by then making the number
of lanes legal. The strategy to follow in the first step is set by a
call to setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy, see example
above. The strategy followed in the second step
"moreToWiderTypesAndLessToWidest" (see code for its definition),
indicating that vectors are widened to more elements so they map to
natively supported vector widths, or when there isn't a legal wider
vector, split the vector to map it to the widest vector supported.
Therefore, for the above specification, some example legalizations are:
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 3)})
returns {WidenScalar, LLT::vector(3, 8)}
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 8)})
then returns {MoreElements, LLT::vector(8, 8)}
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(20, 8)})
returns {FewerElements, LLT::vector(16, 8)}
2. Key implementation aspects.
How to legalize a specific (operation, type index, size) tuple is
represented by mapping intervals of integers representing a range of
size types to an action to take, e.g.:
setScalarAction({G_ADD, LLT:scalar(1)},
{{1, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [ 1, 31[
{32, Legal}, // bit sizes [32, 33[
{33, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [33, 64[
{64, Legal}, // bit sizes [64, 65[
{65, NarrowScalar} // bit sizes [65, +inf[
});
Please note that most of the code to do the actual lowering of
non-power-of-2 sized types is currently missing, this is just trying to
make it possible for targets to specify what is legal, and how non-legal
types should be legalized. Probably quite a bit of further work is
needed in the actual legalizing and the other passes in GlobalISel to
support non-power-of-2 sized types.
I hope the documentation in LegalizerInfo.h and the examples provided in the
various {Target}LegalizerInfo.cpp and LegalizerInfoTest.cpp explains well
enough how this is meant to be used.
This drops the need for LLT::{half,double}...Size().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30529
llvm-svn: 317560
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo has a lot of logic for dealing with register
Defs (i.e. deciding whether to take them into account or ignore them).
This logic gets things wrong in some obscure cases, for instance if an
operand is not a Def for both the current MI and the one we are
comparing to.
I'm not sure if it's possible for this to happen for regular register
operands, but it may happen in the ARM backend for special operands
which use sentinel values for the register (i.e. 0, which is neither a
physical register nor a virtual one).
This causes MachineInstrExpressionTrait::isEqual (which uses
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo) to return true for the following
instructions, which are the same except for the fact that one sets the
flags and the other one doesn't:
%1114 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, def _
%1115 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, _
OTOH, MachineInstrExpressionTrait::getHashValue returns different values
for the 2 instructions due to the different isDef on the last operand.
In practice this means that when trying to add those instructions to a
DenseMap, they will be considered different because of their different
hash values, but when growing the map we might get an assertion while
copying from the old buckets to the new buckets because isEqual
misleadingly returns true.
This patch makes sure that isEqual and getHashValue agree, by improving
the checks in MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo when we are ignoring virtual
register definitions (which is what the Trait uses). Firstly, instead of
checking isPhysicalRegister, we use !isVirtualRegister, so that we cover
both physical registers and sentinel values. Secondly, instead of
checking MachineOperand::isReg, we use MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which checks isReg, isSubReg and isDef, which are the same values that
the hash function uses to compute the hash.
Note that the function is symmetric with this change, since if the
current operand is not a Def, we check MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which returns false if the operands have different isDef's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38789
llvm-svn: 315579
