Summary:
This branch is currently dead since we don't use C++17.
#if __cplusplus > 201402L && LLVM_HAS_CPP_ATTRIBUTE(nodiscard)
#define LLVM_NODISCARD [[nodiscard]]
This branch is Clang-only.
#elif LLVM_HAS_CPP_ATTRIBUTE(clang::warn_unused_result)
#define LLVM_NODISCARD [[clang::warn_unused_result]]
While we could use gnu variant [[gnu::warn_unused_result]], it is not ideal because it works only on functions.
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:41:24: warning: ‘warn_unused_result’ attribute only applies to function types [-Wattributes]
GCC (checked 5,6,7,8) seems to enable [[nodiscard]] even in C++14 mode and does not produce warnings that nodiscard is C++17 feature. but Clang does - but we do not reach it due the code above. So it affects only GCC and does what we want.
Reviewers: jfb, rsmith, echristo, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: MaskRay, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67663
llvm-svn: 372761
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<Instruction> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372758
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372733
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<CmpInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372732
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<LandingPadInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372727
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<Instruction> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372726
Similar to rL372717, we can force the splitting of extends of vector loads in
MVE, in order to use the better widening loads as opposed to going through
expensive extends. This adds a combine to early-on detect extends of loads and
split the load in two, from where normal legalisation will kick in and we get a
series of widening loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67909
llvm-svn: 372721
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<CallInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372720
MVE does not have a simple sign extend instruction that can move elements
across lanes. We currently often end up moving each lane into and out of a GPR,
in order to get elements into the correct places. When we have a store of a
trunc (or a extend of a load), we can instead just split the store/load in two,
using the narrowing/widening load/store instructions from each half of the
vector.
This does that for stores. It happens very early in a store combine, so as to
easily detect the truncates. (It would be possible to do this later, but that
would involve looking through a buildvector of extract elements. Not impossible
but this way seemed simpler).
By enabling store combines we also get a vmovdrr combine for free, helping some
other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67828
llvm-svn: 372717
Summary:
The functions different in two ways:
- getLLVMRegNum could return both "eh" and "other" dwarf register
numbers, while getLLVMRegNumFromEH only returned the "eh" number.
- getLLVMRegNum asserted if the register was not found, while the second
function returned -1.
The second distinction was pretty important, but it was very hard to
infer that from the function name. Aditionally, for the use case of
dumping dwarf expressions, we needed a function which can work with both
kinds of number, but does not assert.
This patch solves both of these issues by merging the two functions into
one, returning an Optional<unsigned> value. While the same thing could
be achieved by adding an "IsEH" argument to the (renamed)
getLLVMRegNumFromEH function, it seemed better to avoid the confusion of
two functions and put the choice of asserting into the hands of the
caller -- if he checks the Optional value, he can safely process
"untrusted" input, and if he blindly dereferences the Optional, he gets
the assertion.
I've updated all call sites to the new API, choosing between the two
options according to the function they were calling originally, except
that I've updated the usage in DWARFExpression.cpp to use the "safe"
method instead, and added a test case which would have previously
triggered an assertion failure when processing (incorrect?) dwarf
expressions.
Reviewers: dsanders, arsenm, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: wdng, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67154
llvm-svn: 372710
When vectorisation is forced with a pragma, we optimise for min size, and we
need to emit runtime memory checks, then allow this code growth and don't run
in an assert like we currently do.
This is the result of D65197 and D66803, and was a use-case not really
considered before. If this now happens, we emit an optimisation remark warning
about the code-size expansion, which can be avoided by not forcing
vectorisation or possibly source-code modifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67764
llvm-svn: 372694
Summary:
Fold
or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X)
into
X s> Y ? -1 : X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/d8Ab
clamp255 is a common operator in image processing, can be implemented
in a shifty way "(255 - X) >> 31 | X & 255". Fold shift into select
enables more optimization, e.g., vmin generation for ARM target.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, kparzysz, bcahoon
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67800
llvm-svn: 372678
We were miscompiling switch value comparisons with the wrong signedness, which
shows up when we have things like switch case values with i1 types, which end up
being legalized incorrectly.
Fixes PR43383
llvm-svn: 372675
Summary:
MemoryPhis may be needed following a Def insertion inthe IDF of all the
new accesses added (phis + potentially a def). Ensure this also occurs when
only the new MemoryPhis are the defining accesses.
Note: The need for computing IDF here is because of new Phis added with
edges incoming from unreachable code, Phis that had previously been
simplified. The preferred solution is to not reintroduce such Phis.
This patch is the needed fix while working on the preferred solution.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67927
llvm-svn: 372673
Summary:
Clamp negative to zero and clamp positive to allOnes are common
operation in image saturation.
Add tests for shifty implementation of clamping, as prepare work for
folding:
and(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> 0 ? X : 0;
or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> Y ? allOnes : X.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, kparzysz, bcahoon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67798
llvm-svn: 372671
When a cold path is outlined, the value tracking in the assumption cache may be
invalidated due to the code motion. We would previously trip an assertion in
subsequent passes (but required the passes to happen in a single run as the
assumption cache is shared across the passes). Invalidating the cache ensures
that we get the correct information when needed with the legacy pass manager as
well.
llvm-svn: 372667
Add support for creating universal binaries which
can contain an archive.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67758
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 372666
is available
In rL372232, we treated names showing up in profile as not cold when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. This caused 70k size regression in
Chrome/Android. The patch put a guard and only enable the change when
profile symbol list is available, i.e., keep the old behavior when profile
symbol list is not available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67931
llvm-svn: 372665
Summary:
Adds the new load_splat instructions as specified at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md#load-and-splat.
DAGISel does not allow matching multiple copies of the same load in a
single pattern, so we use a new node in WebAssemblyISD to wrap loads
that should be splatted.
Depends on D67783.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67784
llvm-svn: 372655
Summary:
Removes duplicated SIMD loads and store instructions and removes
patterns involving GlobalAddresses that were not used in any tests.
Reviewers: aheejin, sunfish
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67783
llvm-svn: 372648
"Implementations are free to malloc() a buffer containing either (size + 1) bytes or (strnlen(s, size) + 1) bytes. Applications should not assume that strndup() will allocate (size + 1) bytes when strlen(s) is smaller than size."
llvm-svn: 372647
This removes the need for ConvertToTarget opcodes in the isel table.
It's also consistent with the recent changes to use TargetConstant
for intrinsic nodes that always take immediates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67902
llvm-svn: 372645
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66773
The OpTypes::OperandType was creating an enum for all records that
inherit from Operand, but in reality there are operands for instructions
that inherit from other types too. In particular, RegisterOperand and
RegisterClass. This commit adds those types to the list of operand types
that are tracked by the OperandType enum.
Patch by: nlguillemot
llvm-svn: 372641
Summary:
Motivation:
- If we can fold it to strdup, we should (strndup does more things than strdup).
- Annotation mechanism. (Works for strdup well).
strdup and strndup are part of C 20 (currently posix fns), so we should optimize them.
Reviewers: efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67679
llvm-svn: 372636
