This solves the motivating case from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38527
If we are legalizing an FP vector op that maps to 1 of the LLVM intrinsics that mimic libm calls,
but we're going to end up with scalar libcalls for that vector type anyway, then we should unroll
the vector op into scalars before widening. This avoids libcalls because we've lost the knowledge
that some of the scalar elements are undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50791
llvm-svn: 340469
This adds the plumbing for the Tiny code model for the AArch64 backend. This,
instead of loading addresses through the normal ADRP;ADD pair used in the Small
model, uses a single ADR. The 21 bit range of an ADR means that the code and
its statically defined symbols need to be within 1MB of each other.
This makes it mostly interesting for embedded applications where we want to fit
as much as we can in as small a space as possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49673
llvm-svn: 340397
This reverts commit 7debc334e6421bb5251ef8f18e97166dfc7dd787.
I missed updating legalizer-info-validation.mir as I had assertions
turned off in my build and that specific test requires asserts. Fixed it
now.
llvm-svn: 340197
- Generate pointer authentication instructions
- The functions instrumented depend on function attribtues:
all (all functions instrumentent)
non-leaf (only those that spill LR)
none
- Function epilogues sign the LR before spilling to the stack and authenticate
the LR once restored
- If the target is v8.3a or greater than can use the combined authenticate and
return instruction
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49793
llvm-svn: 340018
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50401
Add opcodes for llvm.intrinsic.trunc, round, and update the IRTranslator
for the same.
Reviewed by: dsanders.
llvm-svn: 339977
There is no way in the universe, that doing a full-width division in
software will be faster than doing overflowing multiplication in
software in the first place, especially given that this same full-width
multiplication needs to be done anyway.
This patch replaces the previous implementation with a direct lowering
into an overflowing multiplication algorithm based on half-width
operations.
Correctness of the algorithm was verified by exhaustively checking the
output of this algorithm for overflowing multiplication of 16 bit
integers against an obviously correct widening multiplication. Baring
any oversights introduced by porting the algorithm to DAG, confidence in
correctness of this algorithm is extremely high.
Following table shows the change in both t = runtime and s = space. The
change is expressed as a multiplier of original, so anything under 1 is
“better” and anything above 1 is worse.
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| Arch | u64*u64 t | u64*u64 s | u128*u128 t | u128*u128 s |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| X64 | - | - | ~0.5 | ~0.64 |
| i686 | ~0.5 | ~0.6666 | ~0.05 | ~0.9 |
| armv7 | - | ~0.75 | - | ~1.4 |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
Performance numbers have been collected by running overflowing
multiplication in a loop under `perf` on two x86_64 (one Intel Haswell,
other AMD Ryzen) based machines. Size numbers have been collected by
looking at the size of function containing an overflowing multiply in
a loop.
All in all, it can be seen that both performance and size has improved
except in the case of armv7 where code size has regressed for 128-bit
multiply. u128*u128 overflowing multiply on 32-bit platforms seem to
benefit from this change a lot, taking only 5% of the time compared to
original algorithm to calculate the same thing.
The final benefit of this change is that LLVM is now capable of lowering
the overflowing unsigned multiply for integers of any bit-width as long
as the target is capable of lowering regular multiplication for the same
bit-width. Previously, 128-bit overflowing multiply was the widest
possible.
Patch by Simonas Kazlauskas!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50310
llvm-svn: 339922
These correspond to the x86 tests added with rL339790 / rL339791, but I widened
the non-fsin tests to v3f32 to show the problem because AArch supports v2f32 ops.
llvm-svn: 339793
Similar to rL337966 - if the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was
working as expected, I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.
AArch only goes right, and PPC only goes left.
x86 has both, so no diffs there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50091
llvm-svn: 339359
Summary:
Currently, in line with GCC, when specifying reserved registers like sp or pc on an inline asm() clobber list, we don't always preserve the original value across the statement. And in general, overwriting reserved registers can have surprising results.
For example:
```
extern int bar(int[]);
int foo(int i) {
int a[i]; // VLA
asm volatile(
"mov r7, #1"
:
:
: "r7"
);
return 1 + bar(a);
}
```
Compiled for thumb, this gives:
```
$ clang --target=arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv7a -c test.c -o - -S -O1 -mthumb
...
foo:
.fnstart
@ %bb.0: @ %entry
.save {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
push {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
.setfp r7, sp, #12
add r7, sp, #12
.pad #4
sub sp, #4
movs r1, #7
add.w r0, r1, r0, lsl #2
bic r0, r0, #7
sub.w r0, sp, r0
mov sp, r0
@APP
mov.w r7, #1
@NO_APP
bl bar
adds r0, #1
sub.w r4, r7, #12
mov sp, r4
pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, pc}
...
```
r7 is used as the frame pointer for thumb targets, and this function needs to restore the SP from the FP because of the variable-length stack allocation a. r7 is clobbered by the inline assembly (and r7 is included in the clobber list), but LLVM does not preserve the value of the frame pointer across the assembly block.
This type of behavior is similar to GCC's and has been discussed on the bugtracker: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11807 . No consensus seemed to have been reached on the way forward. Clang behavior has briefly been discussed on the CFE mailing (starting here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058392.html). I've opted for following Eli Friedman's advice to print warnings when there are reserved registers on the clobber list so as not to diverge from GCC behavior for now.
The patch uses MachineRegisterInfo's target-specific knowledge of reserved registers, just before we convert the inline asm string in the AsmPrinter.
If we find a reserved register, we print a warning:
```
repro.c:6:7: warning: inline asm clobber list contains reserved registers: R7 [-Winline-asm]
"mov r7, #1"
^
```
Reviewers: eli.friedman, olista01, javed.absar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49727
llvm-svn: 339257
Summary:
Ensure that NormalizedBuildVector returns a BUILD_VECTOR with operands of the
same type. This fixes an assertion failure in VerifySDNode.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50202
llvm-svn: 339013
In expansion of FCOPYSIGN, the shift node is missing when the two
operands of FCOPYSIGN are of the same size. We should always generate
shift node (if the required shift bit is not zero) to put the sign
bit into the right position, regardless of the size of underlying
types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49973
llvm-svn: 338665
The bug is visible in the constant-folded x86 tests. We can't use the
negated shift amount when the type is not power-of-2:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/US1r
...so in that case, use the regular lowering that includes a select
to guard against a shift-by-bitwidth. This path is improved by only
calculating the modulo shift amount once now.
Also, improve the rotate (with power-of-2 size) lowering to use
a negate rather than subtract from bitwidth. This improves the
codegen whether we have a rotate instruction or not (although
we can still see that we're not matching to a legal rotate in
all cases).
llvm-svn: 338592
Previously we were just visiting the blocks in the function in IR order, which
is rather arbitrary. Therefore we wouldn't always visit defs before uses, but
the translation code relies on this assumption in some places.
Only codegen change seen in tests is an elision of a redundant copy.
Fixes PR38396
llvm-svn: 338476
Also refactors some existing code to materialize addresses for the large code
model so it can be shared between G_GLOBAL_VALUE and G_BLOCK_ADDR.
This implements PR36390.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49903
llvm-svn: 338337
This is exchanging a sub-of-1 with add-of-minus-1:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/plKAH
This is another step towards improving select-of-constants codegen (see D48970).
x86 is the motivating target, and those diffs all appear to be wins. PPC and AArch64 look neutral.
I've limited this to early combining (!LegalOperations) in case a target wants to reverse it, but
I think canonicalizing to 'add' is more likely to produce further transforms because we have more
folds for 'add'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49924
llvm-svn: 338317
This teaches the outliner to save LR to a register rather than the stack when
possible. This allows us to avoid bumping the stack in outlined functions in
some cases. By doing this, in a later patch, we can teach the outliner to do
something like this:
f1:
...
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
...
f2:
...
move LR's contents to a register
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
move the register's contents back
instead of falling back to saving LR in both cases.
llvm-svn: 338278
Previously, I thought this was a Windows failure. Then I realized it failed on
every bot that used the verifier. This makes it use the verifier always, and
adds that pass to the pipeline checks so that it's consistent across all bots.
llvm-svn: 338272
Summary:
Attempt to extract a shrl from a udiv or a shl from a mul if this allows a rotate to be formed. This targets cases where the input to a rotate pattern was a mul or udiv by a constant and InstCombine merged one of the shifts with the op.
Patch by: sameconrad (Sam Conrad)
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, lebedev.ri, javed.absar
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: efriedma, kparzysz, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47681
llvm-svn: 338270
It seems like the pass pipeline on Windows is slightly different than on Linux
and macOS. As a result, the arm64-opt-remarks-lazy-bfi test has been failing.
This switches a CHECK-NEXT to a CHECK-DAG to try and get this running properly
again.
It'd be nice to switch it back to a CHECK-NEXT if possible, but the CHECK-NEXT
lines following the line we care about (the optimization remark emitter)
do a pretty good job of enforcing the ordering we want.
Hopefully this works, since I don't have a Windows machine. ;)
Example failure: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/11295
llvm-svn: 338267
Fixed the ASAN failure from before in r338148, so recommiting.
This patch enables the MachineOutliner by default in AArch64 under -Oz.
The MachineOutliner offers around a 4.5% improvement on the current -Oz code
size improvements.
We have done work into improving the debuggability of outlined code, so that
users of -Oz won't be surprised by the optimization. We have also been executing
the LLVM test suite and common external tests such as the SPEC suites
continuously with no issue. The outliner has a low compile-time overhead of
roughly 1%. At this point, the outliner would be a really good addition to the
-Oz pass pipeline!
llvm-svn: 338160
The tests with a constant sub operand were added with rL338143,
but the potential transform doesn't have that requirement, so
adding more tests with variable operands.
llvm-svn: 338150
This patch enables the MachineOutliner by default in AArch64 under -Oz.
The MachineOutliner offers around a 4.5% improvement on the current -Oz code
size improvements.
We have done work into improving the debuggability of outlined code, so that
users of -Oz won't be surprised by the optimization. We have also been executing
the LLVM test suite and common external tests such as the SPEC suites
continuously with no issue. The outliner has a low compile-time overhead of
roughly 1%. At this point, the outliner would be a really good addition to the
-Oz pass pipeline!
llvm-svn: 338133
This is a follow-up suggested in D48970.
Alive proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/sII
We can eliminate an instruction in the usual select-of-constants
to bit hack transform by adjusting the add/sub with constant.
This is always a win.
There are more transforms that are likely wins, but they may need
target hooks in case some targets do not benefit.
This is another step towards making up for canonicalizing to
select-of-constants in rL331486.
llvm-svn: 338132
When fusing instructions A and B, we must add all predecessors of B as
predecessors of A to avoid instructions getting scheduling in between.
There is a special case involving ExitSU: Every other node must be
scheduled before it by design and we don't need to make this explicit in
the graph, however when fusing with a different node we need to schedule
every othere node before the fused node too and we need to make this
explicit now: This patch adds a dependency from the fused node to all
roots in the graph.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49830
llvm-svn: 338046
Summary:
A follow-up for D49266 / rL337166.
At least one of these cases is more canonical,
so we really do have to handle it.
https://godbolt.org/g/pkzP3Xhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/pQyhZZ
We won't get to these cases with I1 being -1,
as that will be constant-folded to true or false.
I'm also not sure we actually hit the 'ule' case,
but i think the worst think that could happen is that being dead code.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar, efriedma
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49497
llvm-svn: 338044
This reverts commit r337951.
While that kind of shared constant generally works fine in a MinGW
setting, it broke some cases of inline assembly that worked before:
$ cat const-asm.c
int MULH(int a, int b) {
int rt, dummy;
__asm__ (
"imull %3"
:"=d"(rt), "=a"(dummy)
:"a"(a), "rm"(b)
);
return rt;
}
int func(int a) {
return MULH(a, 1);
}
$ clang -target x86_64-win32-gnu -c const-asm.c -O2
const-asm.c:4:9: error: invalid variant '00000001'
"imull %3"
^
<inline asm>:1:15: note: instantiated into assembly here
imull __real@00000001(%rip)
^
A similar error is produced for i686 as well. The same test with a
target of x86_64-win32-msvc or i686-win32-msvc works fine.
llvm-svn: 338018
If the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was working as expected,
I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.
This sidesteps the issue of custom lowering for rotates raised in PR38243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38243
...by only dealing with legal operations.
llvm-svn: 337966
GNU binutils tools have no problems with this kind of shared constants,
provided that we actually hook it up completely in AsmPrinter and
produce a global symbol.
This effectively reverts SVN r335918 by hooking the rest of it up
properly.
This feature was implemented originally in SVN r213006, with no reason
for why it can't be used for MinGW other than the fact that GCC doesn't
do it while MSVC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49646
llvm-svn: 337951
In SVN r334523, the first half of comdat constant pool handling was
hoisted from X86WindowsTargetObjectFile (which despite the name only
was used for msvc targets) into the arch independent
TargetLoweringObjectFileCOFF, but the other half of the handling was
left behind in X86AsmPrinter::GetCPISymbol.
With only half of the handling in place, inconsistent comdat
sections/symbols are created, causing issues with both GNU binutils
(avoided for X86 in SVN r335918) and with the MS linker, which
would complain like this:
fatal error LNK1143: invalid or corrupt file: no symbol for COMDAT section 0x4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49644
llvm-svn: 337950
This matches the structure used on X86 and ARM. This requires
a little bit of duplication of the parts that are equal in both
AArch64 COFF variants though.
Before SVN r335286, these classes didn't add anything that MCAsmInfoCOFF
didn't, but now they do.
This makes AArch64 match X86 in how comdat is used for float constants
for MinGW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49637
llvm-svn: 337755
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR for 'check for [no] signed truncation' pattern can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
But the IR-optimal patter does not lower efficiently, so we want to undo it..
This handles the simple pattern.
There is a second pattern with predicate and constants inverted.
NOTE: we do not check uses here. we always do the transform.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49266
llvm-svn: 337166
