This change came about primarily because of two issues in the existing code.
Niether of:
define i64 @test1(i64 %val) {
%in = trunc i64 %val to i32
tail call i32 @ret32(i32 returned %in)
ret i64 %val
}
define i64 @test2(i64 %val) {
tail call i32 @ret32(i32 returned undef)
ret i32 42
}
should be tail calls, and the function sameNoopInput is responsible. The main
problem is that it is completely symmetric in the "tail call" and "ret" value,
but in reality different things are allowed on each side.
For these cases:
1. Any truncation should lead to a larger value being generated by "tail call"
than needed by "ret".
2. Undef should only be allowed as a source for ret, not as a result of the
call.
Along the way I noticed that a mismatch between what this function treats as a
valid truncation and what the backends see can lead to invalid calls as well
(see x86-32 test case).
This patch refactors the code so that instead of being based primarily on
values which it recurses into when necessary, it starts by inspecting the type
and considers each fundamental slot that the backend will see in turn. For
example, given a pathological function that returned {{}, {{}, i32, {}}, i32}
we would consider each "real" i32 in turn, and ask if it passes through
unchanged. This is much closer to what the backend sees as a result of
ComputeValueVTs.
Aside from the bug fixes, this eliminates the recursion that's going on and, I
believe, makes the bulk of the code significantly easier to understand. The
trade-off is the nasty iterators needed to find the real types inside a
returned value.
llvm-svn: 187787
Due to the weird and wondeful usual arithmetic conversions, some
calculations involving negative values were getting performed in
uint32_t and then promoted to int64_t, which is really not a good
idea.
Patch by Katsuhiro Ueno.
llvm-svn: 187703
All insertf*/extractf* functions replaced with insert/extract since we have insertf and inserti forms.
Added lowering for INSERT_VECTOR_ELT / EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT for 512-bit vectors.
Added lowering for EXTRACT/INSERT subvector for 512-bit vectors.
Added a test.
llvm-svn: 187491
CustomLowerNode was not being called during SplitVectorOperand,
meaning custom legalization could not be used by targets.
This also adds a test case for NVPTX that depends on this custom
legalization.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1195
Attempt to fix the buildbots by making the X86 test I just added platform independent
llvm-svn: 187202
This reverts commit 187198. It broke the bots.
The soft float test probably needs a -triple because of name differences.
On the hard float test I am getting a "roundss $1, %xmm0, %xmm0", instead of
"vroundss $1, %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0".
llvm-svn: 187201
CustomLowerNode was not being called during SplitVectorOperand,
meaning custom legalization could not be used by targets.
This also adds a test case for NVPTX that depends on this custom
legalization.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1195
llvm-svn: 187198
Use PMIN/PMAX for UGE/ULE vector comparions to reduce the number of required
instructions. This trick also works for UGT/ULT, but there is no advantage in
doing so. It wouldn't reduce the number of instructions and it would actually
reduce performance.
Reviewer: Ben
radar:5972691
llvm-svn: 186432
Summary:
This patch adds explicit calling convention types for the Win64 and
System V/x86-64 ABIs. This allows code to override the default, and use
the Win64 convention on a target that wants to use SysV (and
vice-versa). This is needed to implement the `ms_abi` and `sysv_abi` GNU
attributes.
Reviewers:
CC:
llvm-svn: 186144
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
