Intrinsic::maxnum and Intrinsic::minnum, along with the associated libc
function calls (fmax[f], etc.) generally map to function calls after lowering.
For some vector types with QPX at least, however, we can legally lower these,
and we don't need to prohibit CTR-based loops on their account.
It turned out, however, that the logic that checked the opcodes associated with
intrinsics was broken (it would set the Opcode variable, but that variable was
later checked only if set for some otherwise-external function call.
This fixes the latter problem and adds the FMAX/MINNUM mappings.
llvm-svn: 264532
Currently this is to mainly to prevent scalarization of integer division by constants.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18307
llvm-svn: 264511
When encountering instructions with regmasks, instead of cleaning up all the
elements in MaybeDeadCopies map, remove only the instructions erased. By keeping
more instruction in MaybeDeadCopies, this change will expose more dead copies
across instructions with regmasks.
llvm-svn: 264462
When merging stores in DAGCombiner, add check to ensure that no
dependenices exist that would cause the construction of a cycle in our
DAG. This may happen if one store has a data dependence on another
instruction (e.g. a load) which itself has a (chain) dependence on
another store being merged. These stores cannot be merged safely and
doing so results in a cycle that is discovered in LegalizeDAG.
This test is only done in cases where Antialias analysis is used (UseAA)
as non-AA store merge candidates will be merged logically after all
loads which have been checked to not alias.
Reviewers: ahatanak, spatel, niravd, arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18336
llvm-svn: 264461
It is possible to have a fallthrough MBB prior to MBB placement. The original
addition of the BB would result in reordering the BB as not preceding the
successor. Because of the fallthrough nature of the BB, we could end up
executing incorrect code or even a constant pool island! Insert the spliced BB
into the same location to avoid that.
Thanks to Tim Northover for invaluable hints and Fiora for the discussion on
what may have been occurring!
llvm-svn: 264454
64-bit, 32-bit and 16-bit move-immediate instructions are 7, 6, and 5 bytes,
respectively, whereas and/or with 8-bit immediate is only three bytes.
Since these instructions imply an additional memory read (which the CPU could
elide, but we don't think it does), restrict these patterns to minsize functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18374
llvm-svn: 264440
This is the same as r255936, with added logic for avoiding clobbering of the
red zone (PR26023).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18246
llvm-svn: 264375
We did not have an explicit branch to the continuation BB. When the check was
hoisted, this could permit control follow to fall through into the division
trap. Add the explicit branch to the continuation basic block to ensure that
code execution is correct.
llvm-svn: 264370
It is incorrect to get the corresponding MBB for a ReturnInst before
SelectAllBasicBlocks since SelectAllBasicBlocks can change the
correspondence between a ReturnInst and the MBB it is in.
PR27062
llvm-svn: 264358
Earlier we were ignoring varargs in LowerCallSiteWithDeoptBundle because
populateCallLoweringInfo does not set CallLoweringInfo::IsVarArg.
llvm-svn: 264354
Summary:
Only adds support for "naked" calls to llvm.experimental.deoptimize.
Support for round-tripping through RewriteStatepointsForGC will come
as a separate patch (should be simpler than this one).
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18429
llvm-svn: 264329
In PIC mode, the registers R14, R15 and R28 are reserved for use by
the PLT handling code. This causes all functions to clobber these
registers. While this is not new for regular function calls, it does
also apply to save/restore functions, which do not follow the standard
ABI conventions with respect to the volatile/non-volatile registers.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 264324
Given that StatepointLowering now uniques derived pointers before
putting them in the per-statepoint spill map, we may end up with missing
entries for derived pointers when we visit a gc.relocate on a pointer
that was de-duplicated away.
Fix this by keeping two maps, one mapping gc pointers to their
de-duplicated values, and one mapping a de-duplicated value to the slot
it is spilled in.
llvm-svn: 264320
KTEST instruction may be used instead of TEST in this case:
%int_sel3 = bitcast <8 x i1> %sel3 to i8
%res = icmp eq i8 %int_sel3, zeroinitializer
br i1 %res, label %L2, label %L1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18444
llvm-svn: 264298
If the operation's type has been promoted during type legalization, we
need to account for the fact that the high bits of the comparison
operand are likely unspecified.
The LHS is usually zero-extended, but MIPS sign extends it, so we have
to be slightly careful.
Patch by Simon Dardis.
llvm-svn: 264296
Summary:
Some target lowerings of FP_TO_FP16, for instance ARM's vcvtb.f16.f32
instruction, do not guarantee that the top 16 bits are zeroed out.
Remove the unsafe AssertZext and add tests to exercise this.
Reviewers: jmolloy, sbaranga, kristof.beyls, aadg
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18426
llvm-svn: 264285
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17711
It disables direct moves on these operations in 32-bit mode since the patterns
assume 64-bit registers. The final patch is slightly different from the
Phabricator review as the bitcast operations needed to be disabled in 32-bit
mode as well. This fixes PR26617.
llvm-svn: 264282
This patch begins adding support for lowering to the XOP VPPERM instruction - adding the X86ISD::VPPERM opcode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18189
llvm-svn: 264260
We need the "return address" of a noreturn call to be within the
bounds of the calling function; TrapUnreachable turns 'unreachable'
into a 'ud2' instruction, which has that desired effect.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18414
llvm-svn: 264224
Strengthen tests of storing frame indices.
Right now this just creates irrelevant scheduling changes.
We don't want to have multiple frame index operands
on an instruction. There seem to be various assumptions
that at least the same frame index will not appear twice
in the LocalStackSlotAllocation pass.
There's no reason to have this happen, and it just
makes it easy to introduce bugs where the immediate
offset is appplied to the storing instruction when it should
really be applied to the value being stored as a separate
add.
This might not be sufficient. It might still be problematic
to have an add fi, fi situation, but that's even less unlikely
to happen in real code.
llvm-svn: 264200
Currently, AnalyzeBranch() fails non-equality comparison between floating points
on X86 (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23875). This is because this
function can modify the branch by reversing the conditional jump and removing
unconditional jump if there is a proper fall-through. However, in the case of
non-equality comparison between floating points, this can turn the branch
"unanalyzable". Consider the following case:
jne.BB1
jp.BB1
jmp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...
AnalyzeBranch() will reverse "jp .BB1" to "jnp .BB2" and then "jmp .BB2" will be
removed:
jne.BB1
jnp.BB2
.BB1:
...
.BB2:
...
However, AnalyzeBranch() cannot analyze this branch anymore as there are two
conditional jumps with different targets. This may disable some optimizations
like block-placement: in this case the fall-through behavior is enforced even if
the fall-through block is very cold, which is suboptimal.
Actually this optimization is also done in block-placement pass, which means we
can remove this optimization from AnalyzeBranch(). However, currently
X86::COND_NE_OR_P and X86::COND_NP_OR_E are not reversible: there is no defined
negation conditions for them.
In order to reverse them, this patch defines two new CondCode X86::COND_E_AND_NP
and X86::COND_P_AND_NE. It also defines how to synthesize instructions for them.
Here only the second conditional jump is reversed. This is valid as we only need
them to do this "unconditional jump removal" optimization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11393
llvm-svn: 264199
We were just completely ignoring the types when determining whether we could
safely emit a libcall as a tail call. This is clearly wrong.
Theoretically, we could dig deeper looking for incidental matches (much like
the generic code in Analysis.cpp does), but it's probably not worth it for the
few libcalls that exist.
llvm-svn: 264084
