- Shrink the opcode field to 16 bits.
- Shrink the AsmVariantID field to 8 bits.
- Store the mnemonic string in a string table, store a 16 bit index.
- Store a pascal-style length byte in the string instead of a null terminator,
so we can avoid calling strlen on every entry we visit during mnemonic search.
Shrinks X86AsmParser.o from 434k to 201k on x86_64 and eliminates relocs from the table.
llvm-svn: 151984
Allows us to de-virtualize the function and provides access to it in
the instruction printer, which is useful for handling composite
physical registers (e.g., ARM register lists).
llvm-svn: 151815
This reverts commit 151760.
We want to move getSubReg() from TargetRegisterInfo into MCRegisterInfo,
but to do that, the type of the lookup table needs to be the same for
all targets.
llvm-svn: 151814
This allows us to make TRC non-polymorphic and value-initializable, eliminating a huge static
initializer and a ton of cruft from the generated code.
Shrinks ARMBaseRegisterInfo.o by ~100k.
llvm-svn: 151806
- The search bounds are constant, in the worst case (ARM target) it will scan over 30 uint16_ts.
- This method isn't very hot, I had problems finding a testcase where it's called more than a dozen of times (no perf impact).
llvm-svn: 151773
Instead of nested switch statements, use a lookup table. On ARM, this replaces
a 23k (x86_64 release build) function with a 16k table. Its not unlikely to
be faster, as well.
llvm-svn: 151751
This requires some gymnastics to make it available for C code. Remove the names
from the disassembler tables, making them relocation free.
llvm-svn: 150303
Make them accessible through MCInstrInfo. They are only used for debugging purposes so this doesn't
have an impact on performance. X86MCTargetDesc.o goes from 630K to 461K on x86_64.
llvm-svn: 150245
When adding the {-1, -1} entry to the DFAStateInputTable, we
need to increment the index used to populate the DFAStateEntryTable.
Otherwise, the entry table will be off by one for each transition
after the {-1, -1} entry. PR11908.
llvm-svn: 149713
It is simpler to define a composite index directly:
def ssub_2 : SubRegIndex<[dsub_1, ssub_0]>;
def ssub_3 : SubRegIndex<[dsub_1, ssub_1]>;
Than specifying the composite indices on each register:
CompositeIndices = [(ssub_2 dsub_1, ssub_0),
(ssub_3 dsub_1, ssub_1)] in ...
This also makes it clear that SubRegIndex composition is supposed to be
unique.
llvm-svn: 149556
The final tie breaker comparison also needs to return +/-1, or 0.
This is not a less() function.
This could cause otherwise identical super-classes to be ordered
unstably, depending on what the system qsort routine does with a bad
compare function.
llvm-svn: 149549
This class is used to represent SubRegIndex instances instead of the raw
Record pointers that were used before.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 149418
