The code used llvm basic block predecessors to decided where to insert phi
nodes. Instruction selection can and will liberally insert new machine basic
block predecessors. There is not a guaranteed one-to-one mapping from pred.
llvm basic blocks and machine basic blocks.
Therefore the current approach does not work as it assumes we can mark
predecessor machine basic block as needing a copy, and needs to know the set of
all predecessor machine basic blocks to decide when to insert phis.
Instead of computing the swifterror vregs as we select instructions, propagate
them at the end of instruction selection when the MBB CFG is complete.
When an instruction needs a swifterror vreg and we don't know the value yet,
generate a new vreg and remember this "upward exposed" use, and reconcile this
at the end of instruction selection.
This will only happen if the target supports promoting swifterror parameters to
registers and the swifterror attribute is used.
rdar://28300923
llvm-svn: 283617
Type visitor code had already been refactored previously to
decouple the visitor and the visitor callback interface. This
was necessary for having the flexibility to visit in different
ways (for example, dumping to yaml, reading from yaml, dumping
to ScopedPrinter, etc).
This patch merely implements the same visitation pattern for
symbol records that has already been implemented for type records.
llvm-svn: 283609
Summary: Add tests for cases where we have zero coverage in RS4GC.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25341
llvm-svn: 283591
If we're going to canonicalize IR towards select of constants, try harder to create those.
Also, don't lose the metadata.
This is actually 4 related transforms in one patch:
// select X, (sext X), C --> select X, -1, C
// select X, (zext X), C --> select X, 1, C
// select X, C, (sext X) --> select X, C, 0
// select X, C, (zext X) --> select X, C, 0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25126
llvm-svn: 283575
This is a new tool built on top of the new YAML ouput generated from
optimization remarks. It produces HTML for easy navigation and
visualization.
The tool assumes that hotness information for the remarks is available
(the YAML file was produced with PGO). It uses hotness to list the
remarks prioritized by the hotness on the index page. Clicking the
source location of the remark in the list takes you the source where the
remarks are rendedered inline in the source.
For now, the tool is meant as prototype.
It's written in Python. It uses PyYAML to parse the input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25348
llvm-svn: 283571
Summary: -fsample-profile needs discriminator, which will not be added if built with -g0. This patch makes sure the discriminator is added for sample-profile at -g0. A followup patch will be send out to update clang tests.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, echristo, dnovillo
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, probinson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25132
llvm-svn: 283565
Previously, we marked the branch conditions of latch blocks uniform after
vectorization if they were instructions contained in the loop. However, if a
condition instruction has users other than the branch, it may not remain
uniform. This patch ensures the conditions we mark uniform are only used by the
branch. This should fix PR30627.
Reference: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30627
llvm-svn: 283563
Summary:
While walking defs of pointer operands we were assuming that the pointer
size would remain constant. This is not true, because addresspacecast
instructions may cast the pointer to an address space with a different
pointer width.
This partial reverts r282612, which was a more conservative solution
to this problem.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, apilipenko
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
llvm-svn: 283557
Reapplying r283383 after revert in r283442. The additional fix
is a getting rid of a stray space in a function name, in the
refactoring part of the commit.
This avoids falling back to calling out to the GCC rem functions
(__moddi3, __umoddi3) when targeting Windows.
The __rt_div functions have flipped the two arguments compared
to the __aeabi_divmod functions. To match MSVC, we emit a
check for division by zero before actually calling the library
function (even if the library function itself also might do
the same check).
Not all calls to __rt_div functions for division are currently
merged with calls to the same function with the same parameters
for the remainder. This is more wasteful than a div + mls as before,
but avoids calls to __moddi3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25332
llvm-svn: 283550
MOVSD/MOVSS take a 128-bit register and a FR32/FR64 register input, the commutation code wasn't taking this into account leading to verification errors.
This patch inserts a vreg copy mi to ensure that the registers are correct.
Fix for PR30607
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25280
llvm-svn: 283539
unrolling.
The next code is not vectorized by the SLPVectorizer:
```
int test(unsigned int *p) {
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++)
sum += p[i];
return sum;
}
```
During optimization this loop is fully unrolled and SLPVectorizer is
unable to vectorize it. Patch tries to fix this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24796
llvm-svn: 283535
With the ROPI and RWPI relocation models we can't always have pointers
to global data or functions in constant data, so don't try to convert switches
into lookup tables if any value in the lookup table would require a relocation.
We can still safely emit lookup tables of other values, such as simple
constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24462
llvm-svn: 283530
Summary:
There was a bug with sequences like
s_mov_b64 s[0:1], exec
s_and_b64 s[2:3]<def>, s[0:1], s[2:3]<kill>
...
s_mov_b64_term exec, s[2:3]
because s[2:3] was defined and used in the same instruction, ending up with
SaveExecInst inside OtherUseInsts.
Note that the test case also exposes an unrelated bug.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, llvm-commits, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25306
llvm-svn: 283528
Summary:
This class deals with the lowering of CodeGen `MachineInstr` objects to
MC `MCInst` objects.
Reviewers: kparzysz, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, beanz, japaric, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25269
llvm-svn: 283522
In the left part of the reports, we have things like U<number>; if some of
these numbers use more digits than others, we don't want a space in between the
U and the start of the number. Instead, the space should come afterward. This
way it is clear that the number goes with the U and not any other optimization
indicator that might come later on the line.
Tests committed in r283518.
llvm-svn: 283519
In the left part of the reports, we have things like U<number>; if some of
these numbers use more digits than others, we don't want a space in between the
U and the start of the number. Instead, the space should come afterward. This
way it is clear that the number goes with the U and not any other optimization
indicator that might come later on the line.
llvm-svn: 283518
GetCaseResults assumed that a terminator with one successor was an
unconditional branch. This is not necessarily the case, it could be a
cleanupret.
Strengthen the check by querying whether or not the terminator is
exceptional.
llvm-svn: 283517
Vectorizer tests in the target-independent directory should not have a target
triple. If a test really needs to query a specific backend, it belongs in the
right target subdirectory (which "REQUIRES" the right backend). Otherwise, it
should not specify a triple.
llvm-svn: 283512
Summary:
I had for the second time today a bug where llvm::format("%s", Str)
was called with Str being a StringRef. The Linux and MacOS bots were
fine, but windows having different calling convention, it printed
garbage.
Instead we can catch this at compile-time: it is never expected to
call a C vararg printf-like function with non scalar type I believe.
Reviewers: bogner, Bigcheese, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25266
llvm-svn: 283509
