disabled and then never turned back on again. Adjust some tests, one because
this change avoids an unnecessary instruction, and the other to make it
continue testing what it was intended to test.
llvm-svn: 107941
1. The arguments are f32.
2. The arguments are loads and they have no uses other than the comparison.
3. The comparison code is EQ or NE.
e.g.
vldr.32 s0, [r1]
vldr.32 s1, [r0]
vcmpe.f32 s1, s0
vmrs apsr_nzcv, fpscr
beq LBB0_2
=>
ldr r1, [r1]
ldr r0, [r0]
cmp r0, r1
beq LBB0_2
More complicated cases will be implemented in subsequent patches.
llvm-svn: 107852
Add explicit testcases for tail calls within the same module.
Duplicate some code to humor those who think .w doesn't apply on ARM.
Leave this disabled on Thumb1, and add some comments explaining why it's hard
and won't gain much.
llvm-svn: 107851
It is OK for an alias live range to overlap if there is a copy to or from the
physical register. CoalescerPair can work out if the copy is coalescable
independently of the alias.
This means that we can join with the actual destination interval instead of
using the getOrigDstReg() hack. It is no longer necessary to merge clobber
ranges into subregisters.
llvm-svn: 107695
the example in the testcase, we now generate:
_test1: ## @test1
movss 4(%esp), %xmm0
addss 8(%esp), %xmm0
movl 12(%esp), %eax
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
ret
instead of:
_test1: ## @test1
subl $20, %esp
movl 24(%esp), %eax
movq %mm0, (%esp)
movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
movss (%esp), %xmm0
addss 12(%esp), %xmm0
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $20, %esp
ret
v2f32 support did not work reliably because most of the X86
backend didn't know it was legal. It was apparently only added
to support returning source-level v2f32 values in MMX registers
in x86-32 mode. If ABI compatibility is important on this
GCC-extended-vector type for some reason, then the frontend
should generate IR that returns v2i32 instead of v2f32. However,
we generally don't try very hard to be abi compatible on gcc
extended vectors.
llvm-svn: 107601
v2f32 as legal in 32-bit mode. It is just as terrible there,
but I just care about x86-64 and noone claims it is valuable
in 64-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 107600
- X86 unfolding should check if the instructions being unfolded has memoperands.
If there is no memoperands, then it must assume conservative alignment. If this
would introduce an expensive sse unaligned load / store, then unfoldMemoryOperand
etc. should not unfold the instruction.
llvm-svn: 107509
PrologEpilog code, and use it to determine whether
the asm forces stack alignment or not. gcc consistently
does not do this for GCC-style asms; Apple gcc inconsistently
sometimes does it for asm blocks. There is no
convenient place to put a bit in either the SDNode or
the MachineInstr form, so I've added an extra operand
to each; unlovely, but it does allow for expansion for
more bits, should we need it. PR 5125. Some
existing testcases are affected.
The operand lists of the SDNode and MachineInstr forms
are indexed with awesome mnemonics, like "2"; I may
fix this someday, but not now. I'm not making it any
worse. If anyone is inspired I think you can find all
the right places from this patch.
llvm-svn: 107506
getFunctionAlignment and the corresponding use of that value in the ARM
asm printer, but now we're using the standard asm printer. The result of
this was that function alignments were dropped completely for Thumb functions.
Radar 8143571.
llvm-svn: 107435
Objective-C metadata types which should be marked as "weak", but which the
linker will remove upon final linkage. However, this linkage isn't specific to
Objective-C.
For example, the "objc_msgSend_fixup_alloc" symbol is defined like this:
.globl l_objc_msgSend_fixup_alloc
.weak_definition l_objc_msgSend_fixup_alloc
.section __DATA, __objc_msgrefs, coalesced
.align 3
l_objc_msgSend_fixup_alloc:
.quad _objc_msgSend_fixup
.quad L_OBJC_METH_VAR_NAME_1
This is different from the "linker_private" linkage type, because it can't have
the metadata defined with ".weak_definition".
Currently only supported on Darwin platforms.
llvm-svn: 107433
A partial redefine needs to be treated like a tied operand, and the register
must be reloaded while processing use operands.
This fixes a bug where partially redefined registers were processed as normal
defs with a reload added. The reload could clobber another use operand if it was
a kill that allowed register reuse.
llvm-svn: 107193
The LowerSubregs pass needs to preserve implicit def operands attached to
EXTRACT_SUBREG instructions when it replaces those instructions with copies.
llvm-svn: 107189
of getPhysicalRegisterRegClass with it.
If we want to make a copy (or estimate its cost), it is better to use the
smallest class as more efficient operations might be possible.
llvm-svn: 107140
There are 2 changes relative to the previous version of the patch:
1) For the "simple" if-conversion case, there's no need to worry about
RemoveExtraEdges not handling an unanalyzable branch. Predicated terminators
are ignored in this context, so RemoveExtraEdges does the right thing.
This might break someday if we ever treat indirect branches (BRIND) as
predicable, but for now, I just removed this part of the patch, because
in the case where we do not add an unconditional branch, we rely on keeping
the fall-through edge to CvtBBI (which is empty after this transformation).
The change relative to the previous patch is:
@@ -1036,10 +1036,6 @@
IterIfcvt = false;
}
- // RemoveExtraEdges won't work if the block has an unanalyzable branch,
- // which is typically the case for IfConvertSimple, so explicitly remove
- // CvtBBI as a successor.
- BBI.BB->removeSuccessor(CvtBBI->BB);
RemoveExtraEdges(BBI);
// Update block info. BB can be iteratively if-converted.
2) My patch exposed a bug in the code for merging the tail of a "diamond",
which had previously never been exercised. The code was simply checking that
the tail had a single predecessor, but there was a case in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms where that single predecessor was
neither edge of the diamond. I added the following change to check for
that:
@@ -1276,7 +1276,18 @@
// tail, add a unconditional branch to it.
if (TailBB) {
BBInfo TailBBI = BBAnalysis[TailBB->getNumber()];
- if (TailBB->pred_size() == 1 && !TailBBI.HasFallThrough) {
+ bool CanMergeTail = !TailBBI.HasFallThrough;
+ // There may still be a fall-through edge from BBI1 or BBI2 to TailBB;
+ // check if there are any other predecessors besides those.
+ unsigned NumPreds = TailBB->pred_size();
+ if (NumPreds > 1)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ else if (NumPreds == 1 && CanMergeTail) {
+ MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = TailBB->pred_begin();
+ if (*PI != BBI1->BB && *PI != BBI2->BB)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ }
+ if (CanMergeTail) {
MergeBlocks(BBI, TailBBI);
TailBBI.IsDone = true;
} else {
With these fixes, I was able to run all the SingleSource and MultiSource
tests successfully.
llvm-svn: 107110
have to be registers, per gcc documentation. This affects
the logic for determining what "g" should lower to. PR 7393.
A couple of existing testcases are affected.
llvm-svn: 107079
When an instruction has tied operands and physreg defines, we must take extra
care that the tied operands conflict with neither physreg defs nor uses.
The special treatment is given to inline asm and instructions with tied operands
/ early clobbers and physreg defines.
This fixes PR7509.
llvm-svn: 107043
if-conversion. The RemoveExtraEdges function doesn't work for blocks that
end with unanalyzable branches, so in those cases, the "extra" edges must
be explicitly removed. The CopyAndPredicateBlock and MergeBlocks methods
can also avoid copying successor edges due to branches that have already
been removed. The latter case is especially helpful when MergeBlocks is
called for handling "diamond" if-conversions, where otherwise you can end
up with some weird intermediate states in the CFG. Unfortunately I've
been unable to find cases where this cleanup actually makes a significant
difference in the code. There is one test where we manage to remove an
empty block at the end of a function. Radar 6911268.
llvm-svn: 106939
CopyFromReg nodes for aliasing registers (AX and AL). This confuses the fast
register allocator.
Instead of CopyFromReg(AL), use ExtractSubReg(CopyFromReg(AX), sub_8bit).
This fixes PR7312.
llvm-svn: 106934
introduced in r106343, but only showed up recently (with a particular compiler &
linker combination) because of the particular check, and because we have no
builtin checking for dereferencing the end of an array, which is truly
unfortunate.
llvm-svn: 106908
