Make getPointersDiff() and sortPtrAccesses() compatible with opaque
pointers by explicitly passing in the element type instead of
determining it from the pointer element type.
The SLPVectorizer result is slightly non-optimal in that unnecessary
pointer bitcasts are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104784
Move content of the "public" header into the implementation file.
This also renames two enumerations that were previously used through
`rust_demangle::` scope, to avoid breaking a build bot with older
version of GCC that rejects uses of enumerator through `E::A` if there
is a variable with the same name as enumeration `E` in the scope.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104362
This borrows as much as possible from the SDAG version of the code
(originally added with D27129 and since updated with big endian support).
In IR, we can test more easily for correctness than we did in the
original patch. I'm using the simplest cases that I could find for
InstSimplify: we computeKnownBits on variable shift amounts to see if
they are zero or in range. So shuffle constant elements into a vector,
cast it, and shift it.
The motivating x86 example from https://llvm.org/PR50123 is also here.
We computeKnownBits in the caller code, but we only check if the shift
amount is in range. That could be enhanced to catch the 2nd x86 test -
if the shift amount is known too big, the result is 0.
Alive2 understands the datalayout and agrees that the tests here are
correct - example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KZJFMZ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104472
v6m cores only have a limited number of registers available. Unrolling
can mean we spend more on stack spills and reloads than we save from the
unrolling. This patch adds an extra heuristic to put a limit on the
unroll count for loops with multiple live out values, as measured from
the LCSSA phi nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104659
If a ctlz operation is performed on higher datatype and then
downcasted, then this can be optimized by doing a ctlz operation
on a lower datatype and adding the difference bitsize to the result
of ctlz to provide the same output:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8uup9M
The original problem is shown in
https://llvm.org/PR50173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103788
Some parts of common.py already permit comment styles besides `;`.
Handle the remaining cases. Specifically, a future patch will extend
update_cc_test_checks.py to call add_global_checks.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104713
This is part of improving floating-point patterns seen in:
https://llvm.org/PR39480
We don't require any FMF because the 2 potential corner cases
(-0.0 and NaN) are correctly handled without FMF:
1. -0.0 is treated as strictly less than +0.0 with
maximum/minimum, so fabs/fneg work as expected.
2. +/- 0.0 with maxnum/minnum is indeterminate, so
transforming to fabs/fneg is more defined.
3. The sign of a NaN may be altered by this transform,
but that is allowed in the default FP environment.
If there are FMF, they are propagated from the min/max call to
one or both new operands which seems to agree with Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bem_xC
The is from discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104247#inline-993387
The contract and reassoc flags shouldn't imply each other .
All the aggressive fsub fusion reassociate operations,
we should guard them with reassoc flag check.
Reviewed By: mcberg2017
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104723
This changes the approach taken to tail-merge the blocks
to always create a new block instead of trying to reuse some block,
and generalizes it to support dealing not with just the `ret` in the future.
This effectively lifts the CallBr restriction, although this isn't really intentional.
That is the only non-NFC change here, i'm not sure if it's reasonable/feasible to temporarily retain it.
Other restrictions of the transform remain.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104598
This adds more poison folding optimizations to InstSimplify.
Since all binary operators propagate poison, these are fine.
Also, the precondition of `select cond, undef, x` -> `x` is relaxed to allow the case when `x` is undef.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104661
With regards to overrunning, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(``subvec``) - 1)
must be valid ``vec`` indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(result_type) - 1)
must be valid vector indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
For the non-mixed cases (e.g. inserting/extracting a scalable into/from
another scalable, or inserting/extracting a fixed into/from another
fixed), it is possible to statically check whether or not the above
conditions are met. This was previously missing from the verifier, and
if the conditions were found to be false, the result of the
insertion/extraction would be replaced with an undef.
With regards to invalid indices, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
``idx`` represents the starting element number at which ``subvec``
will be inserted. ``idx`` must be a constant multiple of
``subvec``'s known minimum vector length.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
The ``idx`` specifies the starting element number within ``vec``
from which a subvector is extracted. ``idx`` must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Similarly, these conditions were not previously enforced in the
verifier. In some circumstances, invalid indices were permitted
silently, and in other circumstances, an undef was spawned where a
verifier error would have been preferred.
This commit adds verifier checks to enforce the constraints above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104468
Spin-off from D104740: I don't think this special handling is needed
anymore. Calls in textual IR are annotated with addrspace(N) (which
defaults to the program address space from data layout) and specifies
the expected pointer address space of the callee. There is no need
to special-case the program address space on top of that, as it
already is the default expected address space, and we shouldn't
allow use of the program address space if the call was explicitly
annotated with some other address space.
The IsCall parameter is retained because it will be used again soon.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104752
NFCI, although the test change shows that ConstantExpr::getAsInstruction
is better than the old implementation of createReplacementInstr because
it propagates things like the sdiv "exact" flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104124
This adds handling for signed predicates, similar to how unsigned
predicates are already handled.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104732
Don't use SCC iterators when we're only interested in reachability.
Use df_begin/df_end inline to find reachable nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104704
This reverts commit ea011ec5ed53599305de62ca5fcfd31f4b3448c3.
This still causes some miscompiles, I'll follow up in the phabricator
review with a sample of that issue (which is part of the sample of
the previous issue).
If an instruction has several operands and a PC-relative one is not the
first of them, the generator may produce the code that does not pass the
'Address' parameter to the printout method. For example, for an Arm
instruction 'LE LR, $imm', it reuses the same code as for other
instructions where the second operand is not PC-relative:
void ARMInstPrinter::printInstruction(...) {
...
case 11:
// BF16VDOTI_VDOTD, BF16VDOTI_VDOTQ, BF16VDOTS_VDOTD, ...
printOperand(MI, 1, STI, O);
O << ", ";
printOperand(MI, 2, STI, O);
break;
...
The patch fixes that by considering 'PCRel' when comparing
'AsmWriterOperand' values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104698
Follow-up on Roman's idea expressed in D103959.
- If a Phi has undefined inputs from live blocks:
- and no other inputs, assume it is undef itself;
- and exactly one non-undef input, we can assume that all undefs are equal to this input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104618
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, nikic
Zero factor leads to division by zero and failure of corresponding
assert as shown in PR50765. We should filter out such factors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104702
Reviewed By: huihuiz, reames
This revision refactors the usage of multithreaded utilities in MLIR to use a common
thread pool within the MLIR context, in addition to a new utility that makes writing
multi-threaded code in MLIR less error prone. Using a unified thread pool brings about
several advantages:
* Better thread usage and more control
We currently use the static llvm threading utilities, which do not allow multiple
levels of asynchronous scheduling (even if there are open threads). This is due to
how the current TaskGroup structure works, which only allows one truly multithreaded
instance at a time. By having our own ThreadPool we gain more control and flexibility
over our job/thread scheduling, and in a followup can enable threading more parts of
the compiler.
* The static nature of TaskGroup causes issues in certain configurations
Due to the static nature of TaskGroup, there have been quite a few problems related to
destruction that have caused several downstream projects to disable threading. See
D104207 for discussion on some related fallout. By having a ThreadPool scoped to
the context, we don't have to worry about destruction and can ensure that any
additional MLIR thread usage ends when the context is destroyed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104516
This patch makes PriorityInlineOrder lazily updated.
The PriorityInlineOrder would lazily update the desirability of a call site if it's decreasing.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104654
In a callback case, a return from internal code, say A, to external runtime can happen. The external runtime can then call back to another internal routine, say B. Making an artificial branch that looks like a return from A to B can confuse the unwinder to treat the instruction before B as the call instruction.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104546
This patch fixes a problem with the AAExecutionDomain attributor not
checking if it is in a valid state. This can cause it to incorrectly
return that a block is executed in a single threaded context after the
attributor failed for any reason.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103186
