Use existing KnownBits helpers from KnownBits.h to simplify G_ICMPs.
E.g.
x == x -> true
x != x -> false
load(x) > 1 -> true (when the load is known to be greater than 1)
And so on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102542
Follow up to D88631 but for aarch64; the Linux kernel uses the command
line flags:
1. -mstack-protector-guard=sysreg
2. -mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0
3. -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0
to use the system register sp_el0 for the stack canary, enabling the
kernel to have a unique stack canary per task (like a thread, but not
limited to userspace as the kernel can preempt itself).
Address pr/47341 for aarch64.
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/289
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm, DavidSpickett, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100919
This patch adds support for GCC's -fstack-usage flag. With this flag, a stack
usage file (i.e., .su file) is generated for each input source file. The format
of the stack usage file is also similar to what is used by GCC. For each
function defined in the source file, a line with the following information is
produced in the .su file.
<source_file>:<line_number>:<function_name> <size_in_byte> <static/dynamic>
"Static" means that the function's frame size is static and the size info is an
accurate reflection of the frame size. While "dynamic" means the function's
frame size can only be determined at run-time because the function manipulates
the stack dynamically (e.g., due to variable size objects). The size info only
reflects the size of the fixed size frame objects in this case and therefore is
not a reliable measure of the total frame size.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100509
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:
* 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
* 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
* 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.
All other values are currently reserved.
If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.
There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
Printing pass manager invocations is fairly verbose and not super
useful.
This allows us to remove DebugLogging from pass managers and PassBuilder
since all logging (aside from analysis managers) goes through
instrumentation now.
This has the downside of never being able to print the top level pass
manager via instrumentation, but that seems like a minor downside.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101797
We never bothered to have a separate set of combines for -O0 in the prelegalizer
before. This results in some minor performance hits for a mode where performance
isn't a concern (although not regressing code size significantly is still preferable).
This also removes the CSE option since we don't need it for -O0.
Through experiments, I've arrived at a set of combines that gets the most code
size improvement at -O0, while reducing the amount of time spent in the combiner
by around 35% give or take.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102038
The comment about how to make use of debugger tuning within DwarfDebug
really belongs inside the DwarfDebug declaration, where it will be
easier to find.
Previously we used an i32 constant to store the saturation width, but i32 isn't
legal on RISCV64. This wasn't a big deal to fix, but it is extra work for the
type legalizer.
This patch uses a VTSDNode to store the type similar to SEXT_INREG. This makes
it opaque to the type legalizer.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101262
GCC supports negative values for -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this
should be a signed value. Pre-req to D100919.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101325
D88631 introduced a set of knobs to tweak how the stack protector is codegen'd for x86 targets, including the offset from the base register where the stack cookie is located. The `StackProtectorGuardOffset` field in `TargetOptions` was left uninitialized instead of being reset to its neutral value -1, making it possible to emit nonsensical code if the frontend doesn't change the field value at all before feeding the `TargetOptions` to the target machine initializer.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99952
Change the definition of G_SBFX and G_UBFX so that the lsb and width
can have different types than the src and dst operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99739
Based on this debugger type, for now, we plan to:
1: use inline string by default for XCOFF DWARF
2: generate no column info for debug line table.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99400
Basically a port of isBitfieldExtractOpFromSExtInReg in AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.
This is only done post-legalization for now. Once the legalizer knows how to
decompose these back into shifts, this requirement can probably be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99230
Darwin platforms for both AArch64 and X86 can provide optimized `bzero()`
routines. In this case, it may be preferable to use `bzero` in place of a
memset of 0.
This adds a G_BZERO generic opcode, similar to G_MEMSET et al. This opcode can
be generated by platforms which may want to use bzero.
To emit the G_BZERO, this adds a pre-legalize combine for AArch64. The
conditions for this are largely a port of the bzero case in
`AArch64SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset`.
The only difference in comparison to the SelectionDAG code is that, when
compiling for minsize, this will fire for all memsets of 0. The original code
notes that it's not beneficial to do this for small memsets; however, using
bzero here will save a mov from wzr. For minsize, I think that it's preferable
to prioritise omitting the mov.
This also fixes a bug in the libcall legalization code which would delete
instructions which could not be legalized. It also adds a check to make sure
that we actually get a libcall name.
Code size improvements (Darwin):
- CTMark -Os: -0.0% geomean (-0.1% on pairlocalalign)
- CTMark -Oz: -0.2% geomean (-0.5% on bullet)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99358
This patch adds a new llvm.experimental.stepvector intrinsic,
which takes no arguments and returns a linear integer sequence of
values of the form <0, 1, ...>. It is primarily intended for
scalable vectors, although it will work for fixed width vectors
too. It is intended that later patches will make use of this
new intrinsic when vectorising induction variables, currently only
supported for fixed width. I've added a new CreateStepVector
method to the IRBuilder, which will generate a call to this
intrinsic for scalable vectors and fall back on creating a
ConstantVector for fixed width.
For scalable vectors this intrinsic is lowered to a new ISD node
called STEP_VECTOR, which takes a single constant integer argument
as the step. During lowering this argument is set to a value of 1.
The reason for this additional argument at the codegen level is
because in future patches we will introduce various generic DAG
combines such as
mul step_vector(1), 2 -> step_vector(2)
add step_vector(1), step_vector(1) -> step_vector(2)
shl step_vector(1), 1 -> step_vector(2)
etc.
that encourage a canonical format for all targets. This hopefully
means all other targets supporting scalable vectors can benefit
from this too.
I've added cost model tests for both fixed width and scalable
vectors:
llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/neon-stepvector.ll
llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-stepvector.ll
as well as codegen lowering tests for fixed width and scalable
vectors:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-stepvector.ll
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-stepvector.ll
See this thread for discussion of the intrinsic:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/147943.html
There is a bunch of similar bitfield extraction code throughout *ISelDAGToDAG.
E.g, ARMISelDAGToDAG, AArch64ISelDAGToDAG, and AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG all contain
code that matches a bitfield extract from an and + right shift.
Rather than duplicating code in the same way, this adds two opcodes:
- G_UBFX (unsigned bitfield extract)
- G_SBFX (signed bitfield extract)
They work like this
```
%x = G_UBFX %y, %lsb, %width
```
Where `lsb` and `width` are
- The least-significant bit of the extraction
- The width of the extraction
This will extract `width` bits from `%y`, starting at `lsb`. G_UBFX zero-extends
the result, while G_SBFX sign-extends the result.
This should allow us to use the combiner to match the bitfield extraction
patterns rather than duplicating pattern-matching code in each target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98464
Previously NEON used a target specific intrinsic for frintn, given that
the FROUNDEVEN ISD node now exists, move over to that instead and add
codegen support for that node for both NEON and fixed length SVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98487
It is good to have a combined `divrem` instruction when the
`div` and `rem` are computed from identical input operands.
Some targets can lower them through a single expansion that
computes both division and remainder. It effectively reduces
the number of instructions than individually expanding them.
Reviewed By: arsenm, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96013
If every element is extracted from a G_BUILD_VECTOR, pass through the source
registers. This is different to the extract(build_vector) combine because this
one tolerates multiple users as long as they're exhaustive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97890
This patch introduces a new intrinsic @llvm.experimental.vector.splice
that constructs a vector of the same type as the two input vectors,
based on a immediate where the sign of the immediate distinguishes two
variants. A positive immediate specifies an index into the first vector
and a negative immediate specifies the number of trailing elements to
extract from the first vector.
For example:
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; index
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, -3) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; trailing element count
These intrinsics support both fixed and scalable vectors, where the
former is lowered to a shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour,
although while marked as experimental the recommended way to express
this operation for fixed-width vectors is to use shufflevector. For
scalable vectors where it is not possible to express a shufflevector
mask for this operation, a new ISD node has been implemented.
This is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker and Cullen Rhodes.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
- Add a new TableGen backend: CodeBeads
- Add support to generate logical operand information
For the first item, it is currently a workaround of M68k's (complex)
instruction encoding. A typical architecture, especially CISC one like
X86, normally uses `MCInstrDesc::TSFlags` to carry instruction encoding
info. However, at the early days of M68k backend development, we found
it difficult to fit every possible encoding into the 64-bit
`MCInstrDesc::TSFlags`. Therefore CodeBeads was invented to provide
an alternative, arbitrary length container for instruciton encoding
info. However, in the long term we incline not to use a new TG
backend for less common pattern like what we encountered in M68k. A bug
has been created to host to discussion on migrating from CodeBeads to
more concise solution: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48792
The second item was also served for similar purpose. It created utility
functions that tell you the index of a `MachineOperand` in a
`MachineInst` given a logical operand index. In normal cases a logical
operand is the same as `MachineOperand`, but for operands using complex
addressing mode a logical operand might be consisting of multiple
`MachineOperand`. The TableGen-ed `getLogicalOperandIdx`, for instance,
can give you the mapping between these two concepts. Nevertheless, we
hope to remove this feature in the future if possible. Since it's not
really useful for the targets supported by LLVM now either.
Authors: myhsu, m4yers, glaubitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88385
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour
so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.
This reverts commit d2000b45d033c06dc7973f59909a0ad12887ff51.
Recommit 4112299ee761a9b6a309c8ff4a7e75f8c8d8851b. Depends on
4c8fb7ddd6fa49258e0e9427e7345fb56ba522d4 which was reverted.
Combine zext(trunc x) to x when truncated bits are known to be zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96031
This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers the addition of the instruction and a set
of basic code changes in MachineInstr and a few adjacent areas, but does not
correctly handle variadic debug values outside of these areas, nor does it
generate them at any point.
The new instruction is similar to the existing DBG_VALUE instruction, with the
following differences: the operands are in a different order, any number of
values may be used in the instruction following the Variable and Expression
operands (these are referred to in code as “debug operands”) and are indexed
from 0 so that getDebugOperand(X) == getOperand(X+2), and the Expression in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR must use the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator to pass arguments into the
expression.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator is only valid in expressions appearing in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR; it takes a single argument and pushes the debug operand at the
index given by the argument onto the Expression stack. For example the
sub-expression `DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0` has the meaning “Push the debug operand at
index 0 onto the expression stack.”
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
This patch adds a pipeline to support in-order CPUs such as ARM
Cortex-A55.
In-order pipeline implements a simplified version of Dispatch,
Scheduler and Execute stages as a single stage. Entry and Retire
stages are common for both in-order and out-of-order pipelines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94928
This adds a G_ASSERT_SEXT opcode, similar to G_ASSERT_ZEXT. This instruction
signifies that an operation was already sign extended from a smaller type.
This is useful for functions with sign-extended parameters.
E.g.
```
define void @foo(i16 signext %x) {
...
}
```
This adds verifier, regbankselect, and instruction selection support for
G_ASSERT_SEXT equivalent to G_ASSERT_ZEXT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96890
Basic block sections enables function sections implicitly, this is not needed
and is inefficient with "=list" option.
We had basic block sections enable function sections implicitly in clang. This
is particularly inefficient with "=list" option as it places functions that do
not have any basic block sections in separate sections. This causes unnecessary
object file overhead for large applications.
This patch disables this implicit behavior. It only creates function sections
for those functions that require basic block sections.
Further, there was an inconistent behavior with llc as llc was not turning on
function sections by default. This patch makes llc and clang consistent and
tests are added to check the new behavior.
This is the first of two patches and this adds functionality in LLVM to
create a new section for the entry block if function sections is not
enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93876
This patch adds a new intrinsic experimental.vector.reduce that takes a single
vector and returns a vector of matching type but with the original lane order
reversed. For example:
```
vector.reverse(<A,B,C,D>) ==> <D,C,B,A>
```
The new intrinsic supports fixed and scalable vectors types.
The fixed-width vector relies on shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour.
Scalable vector uses the new ISD node - VECTOR_REVERSE.
This new intrinsic is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker (@paulwalker-arm).
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94883
This combine tries to do inter-block hoisting of extends of G_PHIs, into the
originating blocks of the phi's incoming value. The idea is to expose further
optimization opportunities that are normally obscured by the PHI.
Some basic heuristics, and a target hook for AArch64 is added, to allow tuning.
E.g. if the extend is used by a G_PTR_ADD, it doesn't perform this combine
since it may be folded into the addressing mode during selection.
There are very minor code size improvements on AArch64 -Os, but the real benefit
is that it unlocks optimizations like AArch64 conditional compares on some
benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95703
GNU ld>=2.36 supports mixed SHF_LINK_ORDER and non-SHF_LINK_ORDER sections in an
output section, so we can set SHF_LINK_ORDER if -fbinutils-version=2.36 or above.
If -fno-function-sections or older binutils, drop unique ID for -fno-unique-section-names.
The users can just specify -fbinutils-version=2.36 or above to allow GC with both GNU ld and LLD.
(LLD does not support garbage collection of non-group non-SHF_LINK_ORDER .gcc_except_table sections.)
This patch allows targets to define multiple cost
values for each register so that the cost model
can be more flexible and better used during the
register allocation as per the target requirements.
For AMDGPU the VGPR allocation will be more efficient
if the register cost can be associated dynamically
based on the calling convention.
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86836
