Summary:
Remove the restrictions that preventing "asm goto" from returning non-void
values. The values returned by "asm goto" are only valid on the "fallthrough"
path.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
Conservatively always save + restore LR in noreturn functions.
These functions do not end in a RET, and so they aren't guaranteed to have an
instruction which uses LR in any way. So, as a result, you can end up in
unfortunate situations where you can't backtrace out of these functions in a
debugger.
Remove the old noreturn test, and add a new one which is more descriptive.
Remove the restriction that we can't outline from noreturn functions as well
since we now do the right thing.
SUMMARY:
In this patch, we map mergeable const objects to the read-only section in the same manner as const objects that are not mergeable.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast,jasonliu
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71551
Remove the chance of non-deterministic insertion of zexts of the
sources by using a SetVector instead of SmallPtrSet. Do the same for
sinks for consistency and to negate the small issue from possibly
happening. The SafeWrap instructions are now also stored in a
SmallVector. The IRPromoter members of these structures have been
changed to references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72322
This is possibly a small part towards solving PR42024:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42024
The vectorizer is creating shuffles of concat like this:
%63 = shufflevector <4 x i64> %x, <4 x i64> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%64 = shufflevector <8 x i64> %63, <8 x i64> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 5, i32 2, i32 6, i32 3, i32 7>
That might be fixable in the vectorizers, but we're not allowed to fold that into a single shuffle in instcombine,
so we should have a backend backstop to convert that into the likely simpler form:
%64 = shufflevector <4 x i64> %x, <4 x i64> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 0, i32 1, i32 1, i32 2, i32 2, i32 3, i32 3>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72300
This is a recommit of D71330, but with a few things fixed and changed:
1) ReachingDefAnalysis: this was not running with optnone as it was checking
skipFunction(), which other analysis passes don't do. I guess this is a
copy-paste from a codegen pass.
2) VPTBlockPass: here I've added skipFunction(), because like most/all
optimisations, we don't want to run this with optnone.
This fixes the issues with the initial/previous commit: the VPTBlockPass was
running with optnone, but ReachingDefAnalysis wasn't, and so VPTBlockPass was
crashing querying ReachingDefAnalysis.
I've added test case mve-vpt-block-optnone.mir to check that we don't run
VPTBlock with optnone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71470
Summary:
It's not necessary to use an 'l'(ell) modifier when referencing a label.
Treat block addresses and MBB references as if the modifier is used
anyway. This prevents us from generating references to ficticious
labels.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71849
A random set of attributes are implemented by llc/opt forcing the
string attributes on the IR functions before processing anything. This
would not happen for MIR functions, which have not yet been created at
this point.
Use a callback in the MIR parser, purely to avoid dealing with the
ugliness that the command line flags are in a .inc file, and would
require allowing access to these flags from multiple places (either
from the MIR parser directly, or a new utility pass to implement these
flags). It would probably be better to cleanup the flag handling into
a separate library.
This is in preparation for treating more command line flags with a
corresponding function attribute in a more uniform way. The fast math
flags in particular have a messy system where the command line flag
sets the behavior from a function attribute if present, and otherwise
the command line flag. This means if any other pass tries to inspect
the function attributes directly, it will be inconsistent with the
intended behavior. This is also inconsistent with the current behavior
of -mcpu and -mattr, which overwrites any pre-existing function
attributes. I would like to move this to consistenly have the command
line flags not overwrite any pre-existing attributes, and to always
ensure the command line flags are consistent with the function
attributes.
This patch adds widening which really just scalarizes because we don't have a strategy for the extra elements we would need to pad with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72193
This isn't a functonal change since we also check the bit width is the
same and the input type is integer. This guarantees the input and
output type are the same. But passing the input type makes the code
more readable.
This is the DAG node for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG :
t21: v4i32 = sign_extend_inreg t18, ValueType:ch:v4i16
It has two operands. The first one is the value it want to extend, and the second
one is the type to specify how to extend the value. For this example, it means
that, it is signed extend the t18(v4i32) from v4i16 to v4i32. That is
the semantics of c code:
vector int foo(vector int m) {
return m << 16 >> 16;
}
And it could be any vector type that hardware support the operation, though
the type 'v4i16' is NOT legal for the target. When we are trying to combine
the srl + sra, what we did now is calling the TLI.isOperationLegal(), which
will also check the legality of the type. That doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70230
The code here isn't great in all caess. Particularly v4f64->v4i32
on 64-bit AVX targets. But there is some improvement in some
configurations.
There's definitely some issues with computeNumSignBits with
X86ISD::STRICT_FCMP. As well as not being able to propagate sign
bits through merge_values nodes that get created during custom
legalization.
Previously, for vectors we created a vselect with a condition that
didn't match what the target wanted according to getSetCCResultType.
To make up for this, X86 had a special DAG combine to detect if
the condition was all sign bits and then insert its own truncate
or extend. By adding the extend/truncate here explicitly we can
avoid that.
ExpandStrictFPOp calls ExpandUINT_TO_FLOAT. Previously, ExpandUINT_TO_FLOAT
returned SDValue() if it wasn't able to handle and needed to unroll.
Then ExpandStrictFPOp would detect his SDValue() and do the unroll.
After this change, ExpandUINT_TO_FLOAT will directly call
UnrollStrictFPOp and return the unrolled result.
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
Reapplied after reversion at rL368660 due to PR42982 which was fixed at rGca7fdd41bda0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
AMDGPU can't unambiguously go back from the selected instruction
register class to the register bank without knowing if this was used
in a boolean context.
UpdateNodeOperands might CSE to another existing node. So we should make sure we're legalizing that node otherwise we might fail to hook up the operands properly. I've moved the result registration up to the caller to avoid having to pass both Result and Op into the functions where it might be confusing which is which.
This address 2 other issues pointed out in D71861.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72021
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bdf0362173fcd256690f61a4d47429c2 (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d691f2704f1079538e0ef29548db159
is too specific. It should/can just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)'
Even if we don't manage to fold `~` into B,
we have likely formed `ANDN` node.
Also, this way there's less similar-but-duplicate folds.
Name: X - (X & Y) -> X & (~Y)
%o = and i32 %X, %Y
%r = sub i32 %X, %o
=>
%n = xor i32 %Y, -1
%r = and i32 %X, %n
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/kOUl
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d691f2704f1079538e0ef29548db159
is too specific. It should just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)',
but we currently fail to sink that '~' into `(B - 1)`.
Name: ~(X - 1) -> (0 - X)
%o = add i32 %X, -1
%r = xor i32 %o, -1
=>
%r = sub i32 0, %X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/rjU
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZVdp
Name: ptr - (ptr & (alignment-1)) -> ptr & (0 - alignment)
%mask = add i64 %alignment, -1
%bias = and i64 %ptr, %mask
%r = sub i64 %ptr, %bias
=>
%highbitmask = sub i64 0, %alignment
%r = and i64 %ptr, %highbitmask
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
For now, we didn't set the default operation action for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG for
vector type, which is 0 by default, that is legal. However, most target didn't
have native instructions to support this opcode. It should be set as expand by
default, as what we did for ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70000
The NoFPExcept bit in SDNodeFlags currently defaults to true, unlike all
other such flags. This is a problem, because it implies that all code that
transforms SDNodes without copying flags can introduce a correctness bug,
not just a missed optimization.
This patch changes the default to false. This makes it necessary to move
setting the (No)FPExcept flag for constrained intrinsics from the
visitConstrainedIntrinsic routine to the generic visit routine at the
place where the other flags are set, or else the intersectFlagsWith
call would erase the NoFPExcept flag again.
In order to avoid making non-strict FP code worse, whenever
SelectionDAGISel::SelectCodeCommon matches on a set of orignal nodes
none of which can raise FP exceptions, it will preserve this property
on all results nodes generated, by setting the NoFPExcept flag on
those result nodes that would otherwise be considered as raising
an FP exception.
To check whether or not an SD node should be considered as raising
an FP exception, the following logic applies:
- For machine nodes, check the mayRaiseFPException property of
the underlying MI instruction
- For regular nodes, check isStrictFPOpcode
- For target nodes, check a newly introduced isTargetStrictFPOpcode
The latter is implemented by reserving a range of target opcodes,
similarly to how memory opcodes are identified. (Note that there a
bit of a quirk in identifying target nodes that are both memory nodes
and strict FP nodes. To simplify the logic, right now all target memory
nodes are automatically also considered strict FP nodes -- this could
be fixed by adding one more range.)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71841
resize only writes to elements that get added. Any elements that
already existed maintain their previous value. In this case we're
trying to erase cached information so we should use assign which
will write to every element.
Found while trying to add new tests to an existing X86 test and
noticed register allocation changing in other functions.
The 'SchedBoundary::releaseNode' is merely invoked for releasing the Top/Bottom root nodes.
However, 'SchedBoundary::releasePending' uses its same logic to check if the Pending queue
has any releasable SUnit.
It is possible to slightly modify the body of the two, allowing re-use of the former ('releaseNode')
in the latter.
Patch by Lorenzo Casalino <lorenzo.casalino93@gmail.com>
Reviewers: MatzeB, fhahn, atrick
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65506
This was increasing the number of instructions when fsub was legalized
on AMDGPU with no signed zeros enabled. This fold should be guarded by
hasOneUse, and I don't think getNode should be doing that. The same
fold is already done as a regular combine through isNegatibleForFree.
This does require duplicating, even though isNegatibleForFree does
this combine already (and properly checks hasOneUse) to avoid one PPC
regression. In the regression, the outer fneg has nsz but the fsub
operand does not. isNegatibleForFree only sees the operand, and
doesn't see it's used from a nsz context. A nsz parameter needs to be
added and threaded through isNegatibleForFree to avoid this.
These operations are needed as building blocks for promoting so they
can't be promoted themselves.
This appeared to work because the fp_extend query type for operation
actions is the result type, not the input type so it never triggered
in the legalizer.
For fp_round, the vector op legalizer just ended up creating a
nop fp_extend that was elided by getNode, followed by a nop
fp_round that was also elided by getNode. This was followed by
a final fp_round from v4f32 back to vf416 which was CSEd to the
original node. Then legalize vector ops just believed that node
legalized to itself. LegalizeDAG took another crack at promoting
it, but didn't have a handler so just skipped it with a debug
message saying it wasn't promoted.
This patch just removes the operation actions to avoid this
non-sense. Found while trying to refactor LegalizeVectorOps to
handle multiple result nodes better.
This allows us to clean up some places that were peeking through
the MERGE_VALUES node after the call. By returning the SDValues
directly, we can clean that up.
Unfortunately, there are several call sites in AMDGPU that wanted
the MERGE_VALUES and now need to create their own.
D56351 (included in LLVM 8.0.0) introduced "frame-pointer". All tests
which use "no-frame-pointer-elim" or "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf"
have been migrated to use "frame-pointer".
Implement UpgradeFramePointerAttributes to upgrade the two obsoleted
function attributes for bitcode. Their semantics are ignored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71863
G_BITREVERSE is generated from llvm.bitreverse.<type> intrinsics,
clang genrates these intrinsics from __builtin_bitreverse32 and
__builtin_bitreverse64.
Add lower and narrowscalar for G_BITREVERSE.
Lower G_BITREVERSE on MIPS32.
Recommit notes:
Introduce temporary variables in order to make sure
instructions get inserted into MachineFunction in same order
regardless of compiler used to build llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71363
G_BITREVERSE is generated from llvm.bitreverse.<type> intrinsics,
clang genrates these intrinsics from __builtin_bitreverse32 and
__builtin_bitreverse64.
Add lower and narrowscalar for G_BITREVERSE.
Lower G_BITREVERSE on MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71363
G_BSWAP is generated from llvm.bswap.<type> intrinsics, clang genrates
these intrinsics from __builtin_bswap32 and __builtin_bswap64.
Add lower and narrowscalar for G_BSWAP.
Lower G_BSWAP on MIPS32, select G_BSWAP on MIPS32 revision 2 and later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71362
This allows us to delete InlineAsm::Constraint_i workarounds in
SelectionDAGISel::SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand overrides and
TargetLowering::getInlineAsmMemConstraint overrides.
They were introduced to X86 in r237517 to prevent crashes for
constraints like "=*imr". They were later copied to other targets.
The early tail duplicator pass introduces new ones, so a MIR test that
infers no phis since there were none on the input would fail the
verifier after running.
SelectionDAG::transferDbgValues() can 'reattach' SDDbgValue from one to
another node, but doesn't change its source order. If the destination node has
the order greater than the SDDbgValue, there are two possible issues
revealed later:
* If debug info is attached to an instruction that is the first definition
of a register, this ends up with a def-after-use and the debug info
gets 'undef' later.
* If MIR has another definition of a register above the debug info,
the debug info may represent a source variable incorrectly because
it appears (significantly) before an instruction corresponded
to this debug info.
So, the patch changes the order of an SDDbgValue when it is moved
to a node with greater order.
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71175
Having TypeSize as a static class variable was causing problems
with multi-threading. Several static functions have now been
converted into methods of TypePromotion and a few other members
of TypePromotion and IRPromoter have been added or removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71832
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This moves the X86 specific transform from rL364407
into DAGCombiner to generically handle 'little to big' cases
(for example: extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8))). This
allows us to remove both the x86 implementation and the aarch64
bitcast(extract_subvector(bitcast())) combine.
Earlier patches that dealt with regressions initially exposed
by this patch:
rG5e5e99c041e4
rG0b38af89e2c0
Patch by: @RKSimon (Simon Pilgrim)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63815
As the extern_weak target might be missing, resolving to the absolute
address zero, we can't use the normal direct PC-relative branch
instructions (as that would result in relocations out of range).
Improve the classifyGlobalFunctionReference method to set
MO_DLLIMPORT/MO_COFFSTUB, and simplify the existing code in
AArch64TargetLowering::LowerCall to use the return value from
classifyGlobalFunctionReference for these cases.
Add code in both AArch64FastISel and GlobalISel/IRTranslator to
bail out for function calls to extern weak functions on windows,
to let SelectionDAG handle them.
This matches what was done for X86 in 6bf108d77a3c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71721
Summary:
Without this check unnecessary FMA instructions are generated when the FSUB terms are reused.
This also has the side-effect that the same value is computed to different levels of precision, which can create undesirable effects if the results are used together in subsequent computation.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, foad, tpr, dstuttard, spatel
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71656
Summary:
We noticed in Julia that the sequence below no longer turned into
a sequence of FMA instructions in LLVM 7+, but it did in LLVM 6.
```
%29 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load, %wide.load16
%30 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load13, %wide.load17
%31 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load14, %wide.load18
%32 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load15, %wide.load19
%33 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi, %29
%34 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi10, %30
%35 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi11, %31
%36 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi12, %32
```
Unlike Clang, Julia doesn't set the `unsafe-fp-math=true` function
attribute, but rather emits more local instruction flags.
This partially undoes https://reviews.llvm.org/D46854 and if required I can try to minimize the test further.
Reviewers: spatel, mcberg2017
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chriselrod, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71495
This reverts commit ee7579409b7d940c4e1314d126e900db30c4edff.
It causes crashes during ThinLTO. I suspect the issue is related to
races on the global TypeSize variable, which is 80 at the time of the
crash.
Summary:
This is documented as the appropriate template modifier for call operands.
Fixes PR44272, and adds a regression test.
Also adds support for operand modifiers in Intel-style inline assembly.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71677
Having this function be recursive could use up way too much stack space.
Rewrite it as an iterative traversal in the tree instead to prevent this.
Fixes PR44344.
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
The calculator was considering instructions such as KILLs as clobbers
of a physical address. This is wrong as meta instructions such as KILLs
produce no output in the final program and thus don't clobber or change
any physical location's value. As a result they're safe to ignore whilst
calculating location list ranges.
reviewers: aprantl, vsk
diff revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70497
fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38753
1) Fix an issue with the incorrect value being used for the number of
elements being passed to [d|w]lstp. We were trying to check that
the value was available at LoopStart, but this doesn't consider
that the last instruction in the block could also define the
register. Two helpers have been added to RDA for this.
2) Insert some code to now try to move the element count def or the
insertion point so that we can perform more tail predication.
3) Related to (1), the same off-by-one could prevent us from
generating a low-overhead loop when a mov lr could have been
the last instruction in the block.
4) Fix up some instruction attributes so that not all the
low-overhead loop instructions are labelled as branches and
terminators - as this is not true for dls/dlstp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71609
Recommit after making the same API change in non-x86 targets. This has been build for all targets, and tested for effected ones. Why the difference? Because my disk filled up when I tried make check for all.
For auto-padding assembler support, we'll need to bundle the label with the instructions (nops or call sequences) so that they don't get separated. This just rearranges the code to make the upcoming change more obvious.
For auto-padding assembler support, we'll need to bundle the label with the instructions (nops or call sequences) so that they don't get separated. This just rearranges the code to make the upcoming change more obvious.
This is in advance of assembler padding directives support where we'll need to bundle the label w/the corresponding faulting instruction to avoid padding being inserted between.
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288d22ed8bef7ac367923374f96b753d6 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c83d2f0f65f3b4fb1a0bc68785bd975.
Add new intrinsics
llvm.experimental.constrained.minimum
llvm.experimental.constrained.maximum
as strict versions of llvm.minimum and llvm.maximum.
Includes SystemZ back-end support.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71624
getTargetConstant prevents any optimizations from operating on the
value and basically says its already been iseled. But since we
want the index to be in a register, this isn't true.
Prior to this we were generating a vbroadcast with an immediate
argument which is illegal and was flagged by the expensive checks
bot.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1f2b8f72b9d59e2b4221b12fb7f9a95, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e57428ce364d3d6c075ff03cb8973462.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary:
r347747 added support for clustering mem ops with FI base operands
including support for fixed stack objects in shouldClusterFI, but
apparently this was never tested.
This patch fixes shouldClusterFI to work with scaled as well as
unscaled load/store instructions, and fixes the ordering of memory ops
in MemOpInfo::operator< to ensure that memory addresses always
increase, regardless of which direction the stack grows.
Subscribers: MatzeB, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, javed.absar, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71334
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
The caller will assert for nodes with more than 2 results unless
we return a null SDValue.
I tried to test this by copying an AArch64 test for ScalarizeVecOp_FP_ROUND.
While it did hit the assert and this commited fixed that. It also
hit a later problem that couldn't be fixed without adding strict
FP support to AArch64.
This started with adding a test to support get code coverage on
ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP by copying an existing AArch64 test
and using constrained sitofp/uitofp intrinsics.
This found 3 separate issues:
-ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP needs to do its own replacement
because the caller can't handle replacing multiple results.
-Missing integer promotion support for sitofp/uitofp
-Chain result not always assigned in ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP.
Committing them together so I can add the test case.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa412090666c10f854322cdc701c1cbf8ed726e,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary:
Right now, DAGCombiner process the nodes in an iplementation defined order. This tends to be fragile as optimisation may or may not kick in depending on the traversal order.
This is part of a larger effort to get the DAGCombiner to process its node in topological order.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70921
This reverts commit aa5ee8f244441a8ea103a7e0ed8b6f3e74454516.
This change broke the sanitizer buildbots. See comments at the patchset
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360) for more information.
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
Summary:
This is a resubmit of D71473.
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71547
Summary:
With DWARF5 it is no longer possible to distinguish normal methods and methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` by just looking at the debug information
as they are both now children of the of the DW_TAG_structure_type that defines them (before only the `__attribute__((objc_direct))` methods were children).
This means that in LLDB we are no longer able to create a correct Clang AST of a module by just looking at the debug information. Instead we would
need to call the Objective-C runtime to see which of the methods have a `__attribute__((objc_direct))` and then add the attribute to our own Clang AST
depending on what the runtime returns. This would mean that we either let the module AST be dependent on the Objective-C runtime (which doesn't
seem right) or we retroactively add the missing attribute to the imported AST in our expressions.
A third option is to annotate methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` as `DW_AT_APPLE_objc_direct` which is what this patch implements. This way
LLDB doesn't have to call the runtime for any `__attribute__((objc_direct))` method and the AST in our module will already be correct when we create it.
Reviewers: aprantl, SouraVX
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71201
It doesn't seem to do anything that SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp can't
do. SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp already handles nodes with a variable
number of arguments and a mix of scalar and vector arguments.
This patch makes it so that cases where multiple instructions that
differ only in their ConstantInt or ConstantFP MachineOperand values no
longer collide. For instance:
%0:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 true
%1:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 false
%2:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 1.0
%3:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 0.0
Prior to this patch the first two instructions would collide together.
Also, the last two G_FCONSTANT instructions would also collide. Now they
will no longer collide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71558
Currently -fuse-init-array option is not effective when target triple
does not specify os, on x86,x86_64.
i.e.
// -fuse-init-array is not honored.
$ clang -target i386 -fuse-init-array test.c -S
// -fuse-init-array is honored.
$ clang -target i386-linux -fuse-init-array test.c -S
This patch fixes first case.
And does cleanup.
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, fhahn, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
Summary:
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473
Summary:
Guard against a potential crash observed in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/32994#issuecomment-524249628
If two branches are collapsed we can encounter a degenerate conditional branch `TBB==FBB`.
The subsequent code assumes that they differ, so we exit out early.
Reviewers: ributzka, spatel
Subscribers: loladiro, dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66657
This refactors the if-statements handling the hashing of various
MachineOperand types into a switch-statement. The purpose is to cover
all the basis for all MachineOperand types while being very deliberate
about which MachineOperand types we are not handling and why (better
added comments). This patch is a NFC redo of https://reviews.llvm.org/D71396.
Much of the changes present in D71396 will come in smaller follow-up patches
that will add support for hashing the MachineOperand types that aren't
covered piece-meal with tests for each new case.
Legalization algorithm is complicated by two facts:
1) While regular instructions should be possible to legalize in
an isolated, per-instruction, context-free manner, legalization
artifacts can only be eliminated in pairs, which could be deeply, and
ultimately arbitrary nested: { [ () ] }, where which paranthesis kind
depicts an artifact kind, like extend, unmerge, etc. Such structure
can only be fully eliminated by simple local combines if they are
attempted in a particular order (inside out), or alternatively by
repeated scans each eliminating only one innermost pair, resulting in
O(n^2) complexity.
2) Some artifacts might in fact be regular instructions that could (and
sometimes should) be legalized by the target-specific rules. Which
means failure to eliminate all artifacts on the first iteration is
not a failure, they need to be tried as instructions, which may
produce more artifacts, including the ones that are in fact regular
instructions, resulting in a non-constant number of iterations
required to finish the process.
I trust the recently introduced termination condition (no new artifacts
were created during as-a-regular-instruction-retrial of artifacts not
eliminated on the previous iteration) to be efficient in providing
termination, but only performing the legalization in full if and only if
at each step such chains of artifacts are successfully eliminated in
full as well.
Which is currently not guaranteed, as the artifact combines are applied
only once and in an arbitrary order that has to do with the order of
creation or insertion of artifacts into their worklist, which is a no
particular order.
In this patch I make a small change to the artifact combiner, making it
to re-insert into the worklist immediate (modulo a look-through copies)
artifact users of each vreg that changes its definition due to an
artifact combine.
Here the first scan through the artifacts worklist, while not
being done in any guaranteed order, only needs to find the innermost
pair(s) of artifacts that could be immediately combined out. After that
the process follows def-use chains, making them shorter at each step, thus
combining everything that can be combined in O(n) time.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, paquette, aemerson, dsanders
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar, paquette
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
and introducing new unittests/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerTest.cpp
relying on it to unit test the entire legalizer algorithm (including the
top-level main loop).
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
In order to make this change, getMemBasePlusOffset() has been extended to
also take a SDNodeFlags parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71206
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows integer constants offsets, but there
are cases where we can use an existing SDValue parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel, craig.topper
Subscribers: craig.topper, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71205
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows positive offsets, but there are cases
where we want to subtract an offset from an existing pointer.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71204
The initial attempt (rG89633320) botched the logic by reversing
the source/dest types. Added x86 tests for additional coverage.
The vector tests show a potential improvement (fold vector load
instead of broadcasting), but that's a known/existing problem.
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
This fixes the buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
Updated pred_load patterns added to AArch64SVEInstrInfo.td by this patch
to use reg + imm non-temporal loads to fix previous test failures.
Original commit message:
Adds the following intrinsics:
- llvm.aarch64.sve.ldnt1
- llvm.aarch64.sve.stnt1
This patch creates masked loads and stores with the
MONonTemporal flag set when used with the intrinsics above.
Summary:
This is a quickfix for PR44275. An assertion that checks that the
DIExpression is valid failed due to attempting to create an entry value
for an indirect parameter. This started appearing after D69028, as the
indirect parameter started being represented using an DW_OP_deref,
rather than with the DBG_VALUE's second operand, meaning that the
isIndirectDebugValue() check in LiveDebugValues did not exclude such
parameters. A DIExpression that has an entry value operation can
currently not have any other operation, leading to the failed isValid()
check.
This patch simply makes us stop considering emitting entry values
for such parameters. To support such cases I think we at least need
to do the following changes:
* In DIExpression::isValid(): Remove the limitation that a
DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operation can be the only operation in a
DIExpression.
* In LiveDebugValues::emitEntryValues(): Create an entry value of size
1, so that it only wraps the register operand, and not the whole
pre-existing expression (the DW_OP_deref).
* In LiveDebugValues::removeEntryValue(): Check that the new debug
value has the same debug expression as the original, rather than
checking that the debug expression is empty.
* In DwarfExpression::addMachineRegExpression(): Modify the logic so
that a DW_OP_reg* expression is emitted for the entry value.
That is how GCC emits entry values for indirect parameters. That will
currently not happen to due the DW_OP_deref causing the
!HasComplexExpression to fail. The LocationKind needs to be changed
also, rather than always emitting a DW_OP_stack_value for entry values.
There are probably more things I have missed, but that could hopefully
be a good starting point for emitting such entry values.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71416
I believe this is a leftover from when fp128 was softened to fp128
on X86-64. In that case type legalization must have been able to
create a load that was the same as N which would make this
replacement fail or assert. Since we no longer do that, this
check should be unneeded.
(except for v4 loclists, which are sufficiently different to not fit
well in this generic implementation)
In subsequent patches I intend to refactor the DebugLoc and ranges data
structures to be more similar so I can common more of the implementation
here.
Summary:
Support alloca-referencing dbg.value in hwasan instrumentation.
Update AsmPrinter to emit DW_AT_LLVM_tag_offset when location is in
loclist format.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: srhines, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70753
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
